Cargando…

Nanoconfined Fluids: Uniqueness of Water Compared to Other Liquids

[Image: see text] Nanoconfinement can drastically change the behavior of liquids, puzzling us with counterintuitive properties. It is relevant in applications, including decontamination and crystallization control. However, it still lacks a systematic analysis for fluids with different bulk properti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leoni, Fabio, Calero, Carles, Franzese, Giancarlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34807577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c07381
_version_ 1784624574309072896
author Leoni, Fabio
Calero, Carles
Franzese, Giancarlo
author_facet Leoni, Fabio
Calero, Carles
Franzese, Giancarlo
author_sort Leoni, Fabio
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Nanoconfinement can drastically change the behavior of liquids, puzzling us with counterintuitive properties. It is relevant in applications, including decontamination and crystallization control. However, it still lacks a systematic analysis for fluids with different bulk properties. Here we address this gap. We compare, by molecular dynamics simulations, three different liquids in a graphene slit pore: (1) A simple fluid, such as argon, described by a Lennard-Jones potential; (2) an anomalous fluid, such as a liquid metal, modeled with an isotropic core-softened potential; and (3) water, the prototypical anomalous liquid, with directional HBs. We study how the slit-pore width affects the structure, thermodynamics, and dynamics of the fluids. All the fluids show similar oscillating properties by changing the pore size. However, their free-energy minima are quite different in nature: (i) are energy-driven for the simple liquid; (ii) are entropy-driven for the isotropic core-softened potential; and (iii) have a changing nature for water. Indeed, for water, the monolayer minimum is entropy driven, at variance with the simple liquid, while the bilayer minimum is energy driven, at variance with the other anomalous liquid. Also, water has a large increase in diffusion for subnm slit pores, becoming faster than bulk. Instead, the other two fluids have diffusion oscillations much smaller than water, slowing down for decreasing slit-pore width. Our results, clarifying that water confined at the subnm scale behaves differently from other (simple or anomalous) fluids under similar confinement, are possibly relevant in nanopores applications, for example, in water purification from contaminants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8717635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87176352021-12-30 Nanoconfined Fluids: Uniqueness of Water Compared to Other Liquids Leoni, Fabio Calero, Carles Franzese, Giancarlo ACS Nano [Image: see text] Nanoconfinement can drastically change the behavior of liquids, puzzling us with counterintuitive properties. It is relevant in applications, including decontamination and crystallization control. However, it still lacks a systematic analysis for fluids with different bulk properties. Here we address this gap. We compare, by molecular dynamics simulations, three different liquids in a graphene slit pore: (1) A simple fluid, such as argon, described by a Lennard-Jones potential; (2) an anomalous fluid, such as a liquid metal, modeled with an isotropic core-softened potential; and (3) water, the prototypical anomalous liquid, with directional HBs. We study how the slit-pore width affects the structure, thermodynamics, and dynamics of the fluids. All the fluids show similar oscillating properties by changing the pore size. However, their free-energy minima are quite different in nature: (i) are energy-driven for the simple liquid; (ii) are entropy-driven for the isotropic core-softened potential; and (iii) have a changing nature for water. Indeed, for water, the monolayer minimum is entropy driven, at variance with the simple liquid, while the bilayer minimum is energy driven, at variance with the other anomalous liquid. Also, water has a large increase in diffusion for subnm slit pores, becoming faster than bulk. Instead, the other two fluids have diffusion oscillations much smaller than water, slowing down for decreasing slit-pore width. Our results, clarifying that water confined at the subnm scale behaves differently from other (simple or anomalous) fluids under similar confinement, are possibly relevant in nanopores applications, for example, in water purification from contaminants. American Chemical Society 2021-11-22 2021-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8717635/ /pubmed/34807577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c07381 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Leoni, Fabio
Calero, Carles
Franzese, Giancarlo
Nanoconfined Fluids: Uniqueness of Water Compared to Other Liquids
title Nanoconfined Fluids: Uniqueness of Water Compared to Other Liquids
title_full Nanoconfined Fluids: Uniqueness of Water Compared to Other Liquids
title_fullStr Nanoconfined Fluids: Uniqueness of Water Compared to Other Liquids
title_full_unstemmed Nanoconfined Fluids: Uniqueness of Water Compared to Other Liquids
title_short Nanoconfined Fluids: Uniqueness of Water Compared to Other Liquids
title_sort nanoconfined fluids: uniqueness of water compared to other liquids
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34807577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c07381
work_keys_str_mv AT leonifabio nanoconfinedfluidsuniquenessofwatercomparedtootherliquids
AT calerocarles nanoconfinedfluidsuniquenessofwatercomparedtootherliquids
AT franzesegiancarlo nanoconfinedfluidsuniquenessofwatercomparedtootherliquids