Cargando…

Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT-scans of impacted lower third molars: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is widely used for preoperative 3D imaging of lower third molars. Hence, for this imaging indication, the present study aimed to define the minimum field-of-view (FOV) size and its optimum placement, to decrease radiation exposure, and highlight the n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ilo, Anne-Mari, Ekholm, Marja, Pakbaznejad Esmaeili, Elmira, Waltimo-Sirén, Janna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34965859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-02029-6
_version_ 1784624577137082368
author Ilo, Anne-Mari
Ekholm, Marja
Pakbaznejad Esmaeili, Elmira
Waltimo-Sirén, Janna
author_facet Ilo, Anne-Mari
Ekholm, Marja
Pakbaznejad Esmaeili, Elmira
Waltimo-Sirén, Janna
author_sort Ilo, Anne-Mari
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is widely used for preoperative 3D imaging of lower third molars. Hence, for this imaging indication, the present study aimed to define the minimum field-of-view (FOV) size and its optimum placement, to decrease radiation exposure, and highlight the need of computer-assisted FOV centering technique for dental CBCT devices. To facilitate proper placement of image field, lower second molar was chosen as reference. METHODS: The retrospective study included 50 CBCT-scans of 46 patients with mean age of 34 years. Based on the lower second molar, a three-dimensional coordinate was formed and the location of mandibular canal (MC) and the dimensions and locations of the lower third molars, and possible associated pathological findings were assessed. Accordingly, the FOV size and position for third-molar imaging were optimized, while ensuring encompassment of all relevant structures. RESULTS: The minimum cylindrical volume, covering lower third molars and MC, was 32.1 (diameter) × 31.6 (height) mm, placed in relation to the second molar crown, top 2.2 mm above cusp tips, anterior edge 6.7 mm in the front of the most distal point of the crown, and lingual edge 7.9 mm on the medial side of the lingual wall. CONCLUSIONS: The optimized FOV for lower third molars was smaller than common standard small FOVs. We recommend using FOV volume 3.5∅ × 3.5 cm for third molars without associated pathology. Accurate FOV protocols are essential for development of new CBCT-devices with computer-assisted and indication-specific FOV placement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8717649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87176492022-01-05 Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT-scans of impacted lower third molars: a retrospective study Ilo, Anne-Mari Ekholm, Marja Pakbaznejad Esmaeili, Elmira Waltimo-Sirén, Janna BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is widely used for preoperative 3D imaging of lower third molars. Hence, for this imaging indication, the present study aimed to define the minimum field-of-view (FOV) size and its optimum placement, to decrease radiation exposure, and highlight the need of computer-assisted FOV centering technique for dental CBCT devices. To facilitate proper placement of image field, lower second molar was chosen as reference. METHODS: The retrospective study included 50 CBCT-scans of 46 patients with mean age of 34 years. Based on the lower second molar, a three-dimensional coordinate was formed and the location of mandibular canal (MC) and the dimensions and locations of the lower third molars, and possible associated pathological findings were assessed. Accordingly, the FOV size and position for third-molar imaging were optimized, while ensuring encompassment of all relevant structures. RESULTS: The minimum cylindrical volume, covering lower third molars and MC, was 32.1 (diameter) × 31.6 (height) mm, placed in relation to the second molar crown, top 2.2 mm above cusp tips, anterior edge 6.7 mm in the front of the most distal point of the crown, and lingual edge 7.9 mm on the medial side of the lingual wall. CONCLUSIONS: The optimized FOV for lower third molars was smaller than common standard small FOVs. We recommend using FOV volume 3.5∅ × 3.5 cm for third molars without associated pathology. Accurate FOV protocols are essential for development of new CBCT-devices with computer-assisted and indication-specific FOV placement. BioMed Central 2021-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8717649/ /pubmed/34965859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-02029-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ilo, Anne-Mari
Ekholm, Marja
Pakbaznejad Esmaeili, Elmira
Waltimo-Sirén, Janna
Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT-scans of impacted lower third molars: a retrospective study
title Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT-scans of impacted lower third molars: a retrospective study
title_full Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT-scans of impacted lower third molars: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT-scans of impacted lower third molars: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT-scans of impacted lower third molars: a retrospective study
title_short Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT-scans of impacted lower third molars: a retrospective study
title_sort minimum size and positioning of imaging field for cbct-scans of impacted lower third molars: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34965859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-02029-6
work_keys_str_mv AT iloannemari minimumsizeandpositioningofimagingfieldforcbctscansofimpactedlowerthirdmolarsaretrospectivestudy
AT ekholmmarja minimumsizeandpositioningofimagingfieldforcbctscansofimpactedlowerthirdmolarsaretrospectivestudy
AT pakbaznejadesmaeilielmira minimumsizeandpositioningofimagingfieldforcbctscansofimpactedlowerthirdmolarsaretrospectivestudy
AT waltimosirenjanna minimumsizeandpositioningofimagingfieldforcbctscansofimpactedlowerthirdmolarsaretrospectivestudy