Cargando…
Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An in vitro study
AIMS: The aim of the study is to compare and evaluate the bonding ability of alkasite restorative material to TheraCal LC™ (TLC), Biodentine™ (BD), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) using an universal adhesive and characterizing their failure modes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety extracted i...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035154 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_193_21 |
_version_ | 1784624605971873792 |
---|---|
author | Mulgaonkar, Aarti de Ataide, Ida de Noronha Fernandes, Marina Lambor, Rajan |
author_facet | Mulgaonkar, Aarti de Ataide, Ida de Noronha Fernandes, Marina Lambor, Rajan |
author_sort | Mulgaonkar, Aarti |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The aim of the study is to compare and evaluate the bonding ability of alkasite restorative material to TheraCal LC™ (TLC), Biodentine™ (BD), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) using an universal adhesive and characterizing their failure modes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety extracted intact human molars were divided into three groups of (n = 30) as Group I (TLC), Group II (RMGIC), and Group III (BD). Each group was subdivided into two based on application of universal adhesive. Cention N was bonded to each sample. Shear bond strength analysis was performed. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 software. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between Group I and Group II (P < 0.05) while Group III showed the least bond strength (P < 0.05). The modes of failure were predominantly cohesive in Groups I and III (TLC and BD) while RMGIC showed mixed and adhesive failures. CONCLUSIONS: The bond strength of Cention N to TLC and RMGIC was similar and significantly higher than that of BD following application of universal adhesive. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8717853 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87178532022-01-14 Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An in vitro study Mulgaonkar, Aarti de Ataide, Ida de Noronha Fernandes, Marina Lambor, Rajan J Conserv Dent Original Article AIMS: The aim of the study is to compare and evaluate the bonding ability of alkasite restorative material to TheraCal LC™ (TLC), Biodentine™ (BD), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) using an universal adhesive and characterizing their failure modes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety extracted intact human molars were divided into three groups of (n = 30) as Group I (TLC), Group II (RMGIC), and Group III (BD). Each group was subdivided into two based on application of universal adhesive. Cention N was bonded to each sample. Shear bond strength analysis was performed. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 software. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between Group I and Group II (P < 0.05) while Group III showed the least bond strength (P < 0.05). The modes of failure were predominantly cohesive in Groups I and III (TLC and BD) while RMGIC showed mixed and adhesive failures. CONCLUSIONS: The bond strength of Cention N to TLC and RMGIC was similar and significantly higher than that of BD following application of universal adhesive. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8717853/ /pubmed/35035154 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_193_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mulgaonkar, Aarti de Ataide, Ida de Noronha Fernandes, Marina Lambor, Rajan Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An in vitro study |
title | Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An in vitro study |
title_full | Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An in vitro study |
title_short | Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An in vitro study |
title_sort | shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: an in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035154 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_193_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mulgaonkaraarti shearbondstrengthevaluationofanalkasiterestorativematerialtothreedifferentlinerswithandwithoutusingadhesivesystemaninvitrostudy AT deataideidadenoronha shearbondstrengthevaluationofanalkasiterestorativematerialtothreedifferentlinerswithandwithoutusingadhesivesystemaninvitrostudy AT fernandesmarina shearbondstrengthevaluationofanalkasiterestorativematerialtothreedifferentlinerswithandwithoutusingadhesivesystemaninvitrostudy AT lamborrajan shearbondstrengthevaluationofanalkasiterestorativematerialtothreedifferentlinerswithandwithoutusingadhesivesystemaninvitrostudy |