Cargando…

Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An in vitro study

AIMS: The aim of the study is to compare and evaluate the bonding ability of alkasite restorative material to TheraCal LC™ (TLC), Biodentine™ (BD), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) using an universal adhesive and characterizing their failure modes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety extracted i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulgaonkar, Aarti, de Ataide, Ida de Noronha, Fernandes, Marina, Lambor, Rajan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035154
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_193_21
_version_ 1784624605971873792
author Mulgaonkar, Aarti
de Ataide, Ida de Noronha
Fernandes, Marina
Lambor, Rajan
author_facet Mulgaonkar, Aarti
de Ataide, Ida de Noronha
Fernandes, Marina
Lambor, Rajan
author_sort Mulgaonkar, Aarti
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aim of the study is to compare and evaluate the bonding ability of alkasite restorative material to TheraCal LC™ (TLC), Biodentine™ (BD), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) using an universal adhesive and characterizing their failure modes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety extracted intact human molars were divided into three groups of (n = 30) as Group I (TLC), Group II (RMGIC), and Group III (BD). Each group was subdivided into two based on application of universal adhesive. Cention N was bonded to each sample. Shear bond strength analysis was performed. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 software. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between Group I and Group II (P < 0.05) while Group III showed the least bond strength (P < 0.05). The modes of failure were predominantly cohesive in Groups I and III (TLC and BD) while RMGIC showed mixed and adhesive failures. CONCLUSIONS: The bond strength of Cention N to TLC and RMGIC was similar and significantly higher than that of BD following application of universal adhesive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8717853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87178532022-01-14 Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An in vitro study Mulgaonkar, Aarti de Ataide, Ida de Noronha Fernandes, Marina Lambor, Rajan J Conserv Dent Original Article AIMS: The aim of the study is to compare and evaluate the bonding ability of alkasite restorative material to TheraCal LC™ (TLC), Biodentine™ (BD), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) using an universal adhesive and characterizing their failure modes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety extracted intact human molars were divided into three groups of (n = 30) as Group I (TLC), Group II (RMGIC), and Group III (BD). Each group was subdivided into two based on application of universal adhesive. Cention N was bonded to each sample. Shear bond strength analysis was performed. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 22 software. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between Group I and Group II (P < 0.05) while Group III showed the least bond strength (P < 0.05). The modes of failure were predominantly cohesive in Groups I and III (TLC and BD) while RMGIC showed mixed and adhesive failures. CONCLUSIONS: The bond strength of Cention N to TLC and RMGIC was similar and significantly higher than that of BD following application of universal adhesive. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8717853/ /pubmed/35035154 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_193_21 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mulgaonkar, Aarti
de Ataide, Ida de Noronha
Fernandes, Marina
Lambor, Rajan
Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An in vitro study
title Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An in vitro study
title_full Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An in vitro study
title_short Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An in vitro study
title_sort shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035154
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_193_21
work_keys_str_mv AT mulgaonkaraarti shearbondstrengthevaluationofanalkasiterestorativematerialtothreedifferentlinerswithandwithoutusingadhesivesystemaninvitrostudy
AT deataideidadenoronha shearbondstrengthevaluationofanalkasiterestorativematerialtothreedifferentlinerswithandwithoutusingadhesivesystemaninvitrostudy
AT fernandesmarina shearbondstrengthevaluationofanalkasiterestorativematerialtothreedifferentlinerswithandwithoutusingadhesivesystemaninvitrostudy
AT lamborrajan shearbondstrengthevaluationofanalkasiterestorativematerialtothreedifferentlinerswithandwithoutusingadhesivesystemaninvitrostudy