Cargando…
Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Prevention of Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: CONSOLE
PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of fosnetupitant (FosNTP) versus fosaprepitant (FosAPR) for preventing highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. This phase III study was the first head-to-head comparison between two different neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists in combi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34793245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01315 |
_version_ | 1784624668439740416 |
---|---|
author | Hata, Akito Okamoto, Isamu Inui, Naoki Okada, Morihito Morise, Masahiro Akiyoshi, Kohei Takeda, Masayuki Watanabe, Yasutaka Sugawara, Shunichi Shinagawa, Naofumi Kubota, Kaoru Saeki, Toshiaki Tamura, Tomohide |
author_facet | Hata, Akito Okamoto, Isamu Inui, Naoki Okada, Morihito Morise, Masahiro Akiyoshi, Kohei Takeda, Masayuki Watanabe, Yasutaka Sugawara, Shunichi Shinagawa, Naofumi Kubota, Kaoru Saeki, Toshiaki Tamura, Tomohide |
author_sort | Hata, Akito |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of fosnetupitant (FosNTP) versus fosaprepitant (FosAPR) for preventing highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. This phase III study was the first head-to-head comparison between two different neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists in combination with palonosetron and dexamethasone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients scheduled to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to FosNTP 235 mg or FosAPR 150 mg in combination with palonosetron 0.75 mg and dexamethasone. The primary end point was overall (0-120 hours) complete response (CR; no emetic event and no rescue medication) rate, stratified by sex and age category, to show the noninferiority of FosNTP to FosAPR (noninferiority margin, –10% for the difference in the overall CR rate). RESULTS: Overall, 795 patients were randomly assigned, of whom 785 received the study drug (FosNTP [N = 392] v FosAPR [N = 393]) and were evaluated for efficacy and safety. The overall CR rate was 75.2% versus 71.0%, respectively (Mantel-Haenszel common risk difference, 4.1%; 95% CI, –2.1% to 10.3%), demonstrating noninferiority of FosNTP to FosAPR. The CR rates in the acute (0-24 hours), delayed (24-120 hours), and beyond delayed (120-168 hours) phases, and at 0-168 hours were 93.9% versus 92.6%, 76.8% versus 72.8%, 86.5% versus 81.4%, and 73.2% versus 66.9%, respectively. The incidence rates of treatment-related adverse events with FosNTP versus FosAPR were 22.2% versus 25.4%, whereas adverse events or treatment-related adverse events relevant to injection site reactions were 11.0% versus 20.6% (P < .001) and 0.3% versus 3.6% (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSION: FosNTP demonstrated noninferiority to FosAPR, with a favorable safety profile and lower risk for injection site reactions. Thus, FosNTP is valuable in the prophylaxis of acute, delayed, and beyond delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8718175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87181752023-01-10 Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Prevention of Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: CONSOLE Hata, Akito Okamoto, Isamu Inui, Naoki Okada, Morihito Morise, Masahiro Akiyoshi, Kohei Takeda, Masayuki Watanabe, Yasutaka Sugawara, Shunichi Shinagawa, Naofumi Kubota, Kaoru Saeki, Toshiaki Tamura, Tomohide J Clin Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of fosnetupitant (FosNTP) versus fosaprepitant (FosAPR) for preventing highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. This phase III study was the first head-to-head comparison between two different neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists in combination with palonosetron and dexamethasone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients scheduled to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to FosNTP 235 mg or FosAPR 150 mg in combination with palonosetron 0.75 mg and dexamethasone. The primary end point was overall (0-120 hours) complete response (CR; no emetic event and no rescue medication) rate, stratified by sex and age category, to show the noninferiority of FosNTP to FosAPR (noninferiority margin, –10% for the difference in the overall CR rate). RESULTS: Overall, 795 patients were randomly assigned, of whom 785 received the study drug (FosNTP [N = 392] v FosAPR [N = 393]) and were evaluated for efficacy and safety. The overall CR rate was 75.2% versus 71.0%, respectively (Mantel-Haenszel common risk difference, 4.1%; 95% CI, –2.1% to 10.3%), demonstrating noninferiority of FosNTP to FosAPR. The CR rates in the acute (0-24 hours), delayed (24-120 hours), and beyond delayed (120-168 hours) phases, and at 0-168 hours were 93.9% versus 92.6%, 76.8% versus 72.8%, 86.5% versus 81.4%, and 73.2% versus 66.9%, respectively. The incidence rates of treatment-related adverse events with FosNTP versus FosAPR were 22.2% versus 25.4%, whereas adverse events or treatment-related adverse events relevant to injection site reactions were 11.0% versus 20.6% (P < .001) and 0.3% versus 3.6% (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSION: FosNTP demonstrated noninferiority to FosAPR, with a favorable safety profile and lower risk for injection site reactions. Thus, FosNTP is valuable in the prophylaxis of acute, delayed, and beyond delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Wolters Kluwer Health 2022-01-10 2021-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8718175/ /pubmed/34793245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01315 Text en © 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL REPORTS Hata, Akito Okamoto, Isamu Inui, Naoki Okada, Morihito Morise, Masahiro Akiyoshi, Kohei Takeda, Masayuki Watanabe, Yasutaka Sugawara, Shunichi Shinagawa, Naofumi Kubota, Kaoru Saeki, Toshiaki Tamura, Tomohide Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Prevention of Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: CONSOLE |
title | Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Prevention of Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: CONSOLE |
title_full | Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Prevention of Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: CONSOLE |
title_fullStr | Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Prevention of Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: CONSOLE |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Prevention of Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: CONSOLE |
title_short | Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Prevention of Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: CONSOLE |
title_sort | randomized, double-blind, phase iii study of fosnetupitant versus fosaprepitant for prevention of highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: console |
topic | ORIGINAL REPORTS |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34793245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01315 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hataakito randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole AT okamotoisamu randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole AT inuinaoki randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole AT okadamorihito randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole AT morisemasahiro randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole AT akiyoshikohei randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole AT takedamasayuki randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole AT watanabeyasutaka randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole AT sugawarashunichi randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole AT shinagawanaofumi randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole AT kubotakaoru randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole AT saekitoshiaki randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole AT tamuratomohide randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole |