Cargando…

Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Prevention of Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: CONSOLE

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of fosnetupitant (FosNTP) versus fosaprepitant (FosAPR) for preventing highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. This phase III study was the first head-to-head comparison between two different neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists in combi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hata, Akito, Okamoto, Isamu, Inui, Naoki, Okada, Morihito, Morise, Masahiro, Akiyoshi, Kohei, Takeda, Masayuki, Watanabe, Yasutaka, Sugawara, Shunichi, Shinagawa, Naofumi, Kubota, Kaoru, Saeki, Toshiaki, Tamura, Tomohide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34793245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01315
_version_ 1784624668439740416
author Hata, Akito
Okamoto, Isamu
Inui, Naoki
Okada, Morihito
Morise, Masahiro
Akiyoshi, Kohei
Takeda, Masayuki
Watanabe, Yasutaka
Sugawara, Shunichi
Shinagawa, Naofumi
Kubota, Kaoru
Saeki, Toshiaki
Tamura, Tomohide
author_facet Hata, Akito
Okamoto, Isamu
Inui, Naoki
Okada, Morihito
Morise, Masahiro
Akiyoshi, Kohei
Takeda, Masayuki
Watanabe, Yasutaka
Sugawara, Shunichi
Shinagawa, Naofumi
Kubota, Kaoru
Saeki, Toshiaki
Tamura, Tomohide
author_sort Hata, Akito
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of fosnetupitant (FosNTP) versus fosaprepitant (FosAPR) for preventing highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. This phase III study was the first head-to-head comparison between two different neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists in combination with palonosetron and dexamethasone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients scheduled to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to FosNTP 235 mg or FosAPR 150 mg in combination with palonosetron 0.75 mg and dexamethasone. The primary end point was overall (0-120 hours) complete response (CR; no emetic event and no rescue medication) rate, stratified by sex and age category, to show the noninferiority of FosNTP to FosAPR (noninferiority margin, –10% for the difference in the overall CR rate). RESULTS: Overall, 795 patients were randomly assigned, of whom 785 received the study drug (FosNTP [N = 392] v FosAPR [N = 393]) and were evaluated for efficacy and safety. The overall CR rate was 75.2% versus 71.0%, respectively (Mantel-Haenszel common risk difference, 4.1%; 95% CI, –2.1% to 10.3%), demonstrating noninferiority of FosNTP to FosAPR. The CR rates in the acute (0-24 hours), delayed (24-120 hours), and beyond delayed (120-168 hours) phases, and at 0-168 hours were 93.9% versus 92.6%, 76.8% versus 72.8%, 86.5% versus 81.4%, and 73.2% versus 66.9%, respectively. The incidence rates of treatment-related adverse events with FosNTP versus FosAPR were 22.2% versus 25.4%, whereas adverse events or treatment-related adverse events relevant to injection site reactions were 11.0% versus 20.6% (P < .001) and 0.3% versus 3.6% (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSION: FosNTP demonstrated noninferiority to FosAPR, with a favorable safety profile and lower risk for injection site reactions. Thus, FosNTP is valuable in the prophylaxis of acute, delayed, and beyond delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8718175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87181752023-01-10 Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Prevention of Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: CONSOLE Hata, Akito Okamoto, Isamu Inui, Naoki Okada, Morihito Morise, Masahiro Akiyoshi, Kohei Takeda, Masayuki Watanabe, Yasutaka Sugawara, Shunichi Shinagawa, Naofumi Kubota, Kaoru Saeki, Toshiaki Tamura, Tomohide J Clin Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of fosnetupitant (FosNTP) versus fosaprepitant (FosAPR) for preventing highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. This phase III study was the first head-to-head comparison between two different neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists in combination with palonosetron and dexamethasone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients scheduled to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to FosNTP 235 mg or FosAPR 150 mg in combination with palonosetron 0.75 mg and dexamethasone. The primary end point was overall (0-120 hours) complete response (CR; no emetic event and no rescue medication) rate, stratified by sex and age category, to show the noninferiority of FosNTP to FosAPR (noninferiority margin, –10% for the difference in the overall CR rate). RESULTS: Overall, 795 patients were randomly assigned, of whom 785 received the study drug (FosNTP [N = 392] v FosAPR [N = 393]) and were evaluated for efficacy and safety. The overall CR rate was 75.2% versus 71.0%, respectively (Mantel-Haenszel common risk difference, 4.1%; 95% CI, –2.1% to 10.3%), demonstrating noninferiority of FosNTP to FosAPR. The CR rates in the acute (0-24 hours), delayed (24-120 hours), and beyond delayed (120-168 hours) phases, and at 0-168 hours were 93.9% versus 92.6%, 76.8% versus 72.8%, 86.5% versus 81.4%, and 73.2% versus 66.9%, respectively. The incidence rates of treatment-related adverse events with FosNTP versus FosAPR were 22.2% versus 25.4%, whereas adverse events or treatment-related adverse events relevant to injection site reactions were 11.0% versus 20.6% (P < .001) and 0.3% versus 3.6% (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSION: FosNTP demonstrated noninferiority to FosAPR, with a favorable safety profile and lower risk for injection site reactions. Thus, FosNTP is valuable in the prophylaxis of acute, delayed, and beyond delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Wolters Kluwer Health 2022-01-10 2021-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8718175/ /pubmed/34793245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01315 Text en © 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Hata, Akito
Okamoto, Isamu
Inui, Naoki
Okada, Morihito
Morise, Masahiro
Akiyoshi, Kohei
Takeda, Masayuki
Watanabe, Yasutaka
Sugawara, Shunichi
Shinagawa, Naofumi
Kubota, Kaoru
Saeki, Toshiaki
Tamura, Tomohide
Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Prevention of Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: CONSOLE
title Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Prevention of Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: CONSOLE
title_full Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Prevention of Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: CONSOLE
title_fullStr Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Prevention of Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: CONSOLE
title_full_unstemmed Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Prevention of Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: CONSOLE
title_short Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study of Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Prevention of Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: CONSOLE
title_sort randomized, double-blind, phase iii study of fosnetupitant versus fosaprepitant for prevention of highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: console
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34793245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01315
work_keys_str_mv AT hataakito randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole
AT okamotoisamu randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole
AT inuinaoki randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole
AT okadamorihito randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole
AT morisemasahiro randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole
AT akiyoshikohei randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole
AT takedamasayuki randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole
AT watanabeyasutaka randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole
AT sugawarashunichi randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole
AT shinagawanaofumi randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole
AT kubotakaoru randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole
AT saekitoshiaki randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole
AT tamuratomohide randomizeddoubleblindphaseiiistudyoffosnetupitantversusfosaprepitantforpreventionofhighlyemetogenicchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingconsole