Cargando…

Epicardial adipose tissue is a robust measure of increased risk of myocardial infarction – a meta-analysis on over 6600 patients and rationale for the EPIC-ACS study

BACKGROUND: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) surrounds the heart and the coronary vessels. EAT produces pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Several studies have already documented the association of EAT and cardiovascular risk factors as well as coronary artery disease manifestations. Currently com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hendricks, Stefanie, Dykun, Iryna, Balcer, Bastian, Totzeck, Matthias, Rassaf, Tienush, Mahabadi, Amir Abbas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34967351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028060
_version_ 1784624680820277248
author Hendricks, Stefanie
Dykun, Iryna
Balcer, Bastian
Totzeck, Matthias
Rassaf, Tienush
Mahabadi, Amir Abbas
author_facet Hendricks, Stefanie
Dykun, Iryna
Balcer, Bastian
Totzeck, Matthias
Rassaf, Tienush
Mahabadi, Amir Abbas
author_sort Hendricks, Stefanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) surrounds the heart and the coronary vessels. EAT produces pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Several studies have already documented the association of EAT and cardiovascular risk factors as well as coronary artery disease manifestations. Currently computed tomography (CT) is considered the gold standard for measurement of 3-dimensional volume of EAT. In addition, echocardiography might be an easy accessible alternative in particular in an emergency setting. METHODS: We performed a metaanalysis of existing studies describing the differences of EAT in patients with and without myocardial infarction. We used established databases and were searching for “epicardial adipose tissue” or “pericardial adipose tissue” and “myocardial infarction”, “coronary events”, or “acute coronary syndrome”. We included over 6600 patients from 7 studies. Random effect models were calculated and all analyses were performed by using the Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: Patients with myocardial infarction had 37% (confidence interval [0.21-0.54], P value <.001)] higher measures of EAT compared to patients without myocardial infarction. Comparing studies using echocardiography vs CT for assessment of EAT thickness, similar relative differences in EAT with wide overlap of confidence intervals were observed (for echocardiography: 0.4 [0.04-0.76], for CT: 0.36 [0.16-0.57], P value <.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with myocardial infarction have more EAT as compared to patients without myocardial infarction independently of the used imaging modality. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate, how quantification of EAT in clinical routine can improve patients management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8718235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87182352022-01-03 Epicardial adipose tissue is a robust measure of increased risk of myocardial infarction – a meta-analysis on over 6600 patients and rationale for the EPIC-ACS study Hendricks, Stefanie Dykun, Iryna Balcer, Bastian Totzeck, Matthias Rassaf, Tienush Mahabadi, Amir Abbas Medicine (Baltimore) 3400 BACKGROUND: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) surrounds the heart and the coronary vessels. EAT produces pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Several studies have already documented the association of EAT and cardiovascular risk factors as well as coronary artery disease manifestations. Currently computed tomography (CT) is considered the gold standard for measurement of 3-dimensional volume of EAT. In addition, echocardiography might be an easy accessible alternative in particular in an emergency setting. METHODS: We performed a metaanalysis of existing studies describing the differences of EAT in patients with and without myocardial infarction. We used established databases and were searching for “epicardial adipose tissue” or “pericardial adipose tissue” and “myocardial infarction”, “coronary events”, or “acute coronary syndrome”. We included over 6600 patients from 7 studies. Random effect models were calculated and all analyses were performed by using the Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: Patients with myocardial infarction had 37% (confidence interval [0.21-0.54], P value <.001)] higher measures of EAT compared to patients without myocardial infarction. Comparing studies using echocardiography vs CT for assessment of EAT thickness, similar relative differences in EAT with wide overlap of confidence intervals were observed (for echocardiography: 0.4 [0.04-0.76], for CT: 0.36 [0.16-0.57], P value <.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with myocardial infarction have more EAT as compared to patients without myocardial infarction independently of the used imaging modality. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate, how quantification of EAT in clinical routine can improve patients management. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8718235/ /pubmed/34967351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028060 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 3400
Hendricks, Stefanie
Dykun, Iryna
Balcer, Bastian
Totzeck, Matthias
Rassaf, Tienush
Mahabadi, Amir Abbas
Epicardial adipose tissue is a robust measure of increased risk of myocardial infarction – a meta-analysis on over 6600 patients and rationale for the EPIC-ACS study
title Epicardial adipose tissue is a robust measure of increased risk of myocardial infarction – a meta-analysis on over 6600 patients and rationale for the EPIC-ACS study
title_full Epicardial adipose tissue is a robust measure of increased risk of myocardial infarction – a meta-analysis on over 6600 patients and rationale for the EPIC-ACS study
title_fullStr Epicardial adipose tissue is a robust measure of increased risk of myocardial infarction – a meta-analysis on over 6600 patients and rationale for the EPIC-ACS study
title_full_unstemmed Epicardial adipose tissue is a robust measure of increased risk of myocardial infarction – a meta-analysis on over 6600 patients and rationale for the EPIC-ACS study
title_short Epicardial adipose tissue is a robust measure of increased risk of myocardial infarction – a meta-analysis on over 6600 patients and rationale for the EPIC-ACS study
title_sort epicardial adipose tissue is a robust measure of increased risk of myocardial infarction – a meta-analysis on over 6600 patients and rationale for the epic-acs study
topic 3400
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34967351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028060
work_keys_str_mv AT hendricksstefanie epicardialadiposetissueisarobustmeasureofincreasedriskofmyocardialinfarctionametaanalysisonover6600patientsandrationalefortheepicacsstudy
AT dykuniryna epicardialadiposetissueisarobustmeasureofincreasedriskofmyocardialinfarctionametaanalysisonover6600patientsandrationalefortheepicacsstudy
AT balcerbastian epicardialadiposetissueisarobustmeasureofincreasedriskofmyocardialinfarctionametaanalysisonover6600patientsandrationalefortheepicacsstudy
AT totzeckmatthias epicardialadiposetissueisarobustmeasureofincreasedriskofmyocardialinfarctionametaanalysisonover6600patientsandrationalefortheepicacsstudy
AT rassaftienush epicardialadiposetissueisarobustmeasureofincreasedriskofmyocardialinfarctionametaanalysisonover6600patientsandrationalefortheepicacsstudy
AT mahabadiamirabbas epicardialadiposetissueisarobustmeasureofincreasedriskofmyocardialinfarctionametaanalysisonover6600patientsandrationalefortheepicacsstudy