Cargando…

Effect of Luminance and Contrast Variation on Stereoacuity Measurements Using Smartphone Technology

Owing to the limitations of printed stereoacuity tests, the effects of luminance and contrast on stereopsis have not yet been sufficiently investigated, despite its important implications in designing stereoacuity measuring instruments, particularly for electronic devices. A stereopsis measurement s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Lu, Xu, Lingxian, Wang, Junyue, Wu, Huang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34976407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5258782
_version_ 1784624689550721024
author Liu, Lu
Xu, Lingxian
Wang, Junyue
Wu, Huang
author_facet Liu, Lu
Xu, Lingxian
Wang, Junyue
Wu, Huang
author_sort Liu, Lu
collection PubMed
description Owing to the limitations of printed stereoacuity tests, the effects of luminance and contrast on stereopsis have not yet been sufficiently investigated, despite its important implications in designing stereoacuity measuring instruments, particularly for electronic devices. A stereopsis measurement system was established using two 4 K smartphones and a phoropter to evaluate the effects of luminance and contrast variations on the stereoacuity test. Seventeen young subjects with normal visual acuity and stereopsis were recruited. Two types of test symbols, contour-based and random-dot-based, were used in the experiment. Four series tests were established with different maximum brightness values, including 240 lux, 120 lux, 60 lux, and 30 lux. Each series test contained 19 pages with different contrasts between 95% and 5% and was calculated using the Michelson contrast formula. No significant difference was found for both contour-based and random-dot-based stereograms in any of the contrast groups with different maximum brightness. Similarly, no significant difference was found between contour-based and random-dot-based patterns under different contrasts of above 35%. As the contrast decreased below 30%, the stereopsis was significantly better in the contour-based pattern than in the random-dot-based pattern for some degrees of contrast. The luminance and contrast of the digital display are not critical factors for stereoacuity under normal circumstances. This implies that a standard monitor with a certain 3D technology can be used to measure the stereoacuity threshold without calibrating the luminance and contrast.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8718285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87182852021-12-31 Effect of Luminance and Contrast Variation on Stereoacuity Measurements Using Smartphone Technology Liu, Lu Xu, Lingxian Wang, Junyue Wu, Huang J Ophthalmol Research Article Owing to the limitations of printed stereoacuity tests, the effects of luminance and contrast on stereopsis have not yet been sufficiently investigated, despite its important implications in designing stereoacuity measuring instruments, particularly for electronic devices. A stereopsis measurement system was established using two 4 K smartphones and a phoropter to evaluate the effects of luminance and contrast variations on the stereoacuity test. Seventeen young subjects with normal visual acuity and stereopsis were recruited. Two types of test symbols, contour-based and random-dot-based, were used in the experiment. Four series tests were established with different maximum brightness values, including 240 lux, 120 lux, 60 lux, and 30 lux. Each series test contained 19 pages with different contrasts between 95% and 5% and was calculated using the Michelson contrast formula. No significant difference was found for both contour-based and random-dot-based stereograms in any of the contrast groups with different maximum brightness. Similarly, no significant difference was found between contour-based and random-dot-based patterns under different contrasts of above 35%. As the contrast decreased below 30%, the stereopsis was significantly better in the contour-based pattern than in the random-dot-based pattern for some degrees of contrast. The luminance and contrast of the digital display are not critical factors for stereoacuity under normal circumstances. This implies that a standard monitor with a certain 3D technology can be used to measure the stereoacuity threshold without calibrating the luminance and contrast. Hindawi 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8718285/ /pubmed/34976407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5258782 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lu Liu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Lu
Xu, Lingxian
Wang, Junyue
Wu, Huang
Effect of Luminance and Contrast Variation on Stereoacuity Measurements Using Smartphone Technology
title Effect of Luminance and Contrast Variation on Stereoacuity Measurements Using Smartphone Technology
title_full Effect of Luminance and Contrast Variation on Stereoacuity Measurements Using Smartphone Technology
title_fullStr Effect of Luminance and Contrast Variation on Stereoacuity Measurements Using Smartphone Technology
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Luminance and Contrast Variation on Stereoacuity Measurements Using Smartphone Technology
title_short Effect of Luminance and Contrast Variation on Stereoacuity Measurements Using Smartphone Technology
title_sort effect of luminance and contrast variation on stereoacuity measurements using smartphone technology
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34976407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5258782
work_keys_str_mv AT liulu effectofluminanceandcontrastvariationonstereoacuitymeasurementsusingsmartphonetechnology
AT xulingxian effectofluminanceandcontrastvariationonstereoacuitymeasurementsusingsmartphonetechnology
AT wangjunyue effectofluminanceandcontrastvariationonstereoacuitymeasurementsusingsmartphonetechnology
AT wuhuang effectofluminanceandcontrastvariationonstereoacuitymeasurementsusingsmartphonetechnology