Cargando…

Posterior Dynamic Stabilization with Limited Rediscectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation

OBJECTIVE: Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) is the most common cause of sciatica after primary discectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of transpedicular dynamic stabilization (TDS) combined with limited rediscectomy in the treatment of single-level RLDH. METHODS: We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Lei, Zhao, Chen, Li, Pei, Liu, Liehua, Zhou, Qiang, Luo, Fei, Liang, Lichuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34976251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1288246
_version_ 1784624690524848128
author Luo, Lei
Zhao, Chen
Li, Pei
Liu, Liehua
Zhou, Qiang
Luo, Fei
Liang, Lichuan
author_facet Luo, Lei
Zhao, Chen
Li, Pei
Liu, Liehua
Zhou, Qiang
Luo, Fei
Liang, Lichuan
author_sort Luo, Lei
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) is the most common cause of sciatica after primary discectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of transpedicular dynamic stabilization (TDS) combined with limited rediscectomy in the treatment of single-level RLDH. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated a consecutive series of 24 middle-aged patients who underwent TDS (Dynesys system) combined with limited rediscectomy (i.e., removing only extruded or loose disc fragments) for single-level Carragee type II and type IV RLDH between April 2012 and September 2017. Clinical results were evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS) for leg and low back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and complications. Imaging data include lumbar segment motion and intervertebral height. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 38 months. The VAS and ODI scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up. The average range of motion (ROM) at the stabilized segment was 6.4° before surgery and 4.2° at the last follow-up, with a 78.6% mean preservation (P < 0.05). Intervertebral height at the stabilized segment decreased slightly after surgery (P < 0.05). However, there was no further decline at the last follow-up. There were no cases of reherniation, screw loosening, or segmental instability. CONCLUSIONS: TDS combined with limited rediscectomy resulted in an effective procedure in middle-aged patients with Carragee type II and type IV RLDH. It was able to stabilize the operated segment with partial motion preservation. Moreover, it could maintain disc height and decrease the risk of recurrence in patients with a large posterior annular defect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8718289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87182892021-12-31 Posterior Dynamic Stabilization with Limited Rediscectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation Luo, Lei Zhao, Chen Li, Pei Liu, Liehua Zhou, Qiang Luo, Fei Liang, Lichuan Pain Res Manag Research Article OBJECTIVE: Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (RLDH) is the most common cause of sciatica after primary discectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of transpedicular dynamic stabilization (TDS) combined with limited rediscectomy in the treatment of single-level RLDH. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated a consecutive series of 24 middle-aged patients who underwent TDS (Dynesys system) combined with limited rediscectomy (i.e., removing only extruded or loose disc fragments) for single-level Carragee type II and type IV RLDH between April 2012 and September 2017. Clinical results were evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS) for leg and low back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and complications. Imaging data include lumbar segment motion and intervertebral height. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 38 months. The VAS and ODI scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up. The average range of motion (ROM) at the stabilized segment was 6.4° before surgery and 4.2° at the last follow-up, with a 78.6% mean preservation (P < 0.05). Intervertebral height at the stabilized segment decreased slightly after surgery (P < 0.05). However, there was no further decline at the last follow-up. There were no cases of reherniation, screw loosening, or segmental instability. CONCLUSIONS: TDS combined with limited rediscectomy resulted in an effective procedure in middle-aged patients with Carragee type II and type IV RLDH. It was able to stabilize the operated segment with partial motion preservation. Moreover, it could maintain disc height and decrease the risk of recurrence in patients with a large posterior annular defect. Hindawi 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8718289/ /pubmed/34976251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1288246 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lei Luo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Luo, Lei
Zhao, Chen
Li, Pei
Liu, Liehua
Zhou, Qiang
Luo, Fei
Liang, Lichuan
Posterior Dynamic Stabilization with Limited Rediscectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation
title Posterior Dynamic Stabilization with Limited Rediscectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation
title_full Posterior Dynamic Stabilization with Limited Rediscectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation
title_fullStr Posterior Dynamic Stabilization with Limited Rediscectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation
title_full_unstemmed Posterior Dynamic Stabilization with Limited Rediscectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation
title_short Posterior Dynamic Stabilization with Limited Rediscectomy for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation
title_sort posterior dynamic stabilization with limited rediscectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34976251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/1288246
work_keys_str_mv AT luolei posteriordynamicstabilizationwithlimitedrediscectomyforrecurrentlumbardischerniation
AT zhaochen posteriordynamicstabilizationwithlimitedrediscectomyforrecurrentlumbardischerniation
AT lipei posteriordynamicstabilizationwithlimitedrediscectomyforrecurrentlumbardischerniation
AT liuliehua posteriordynamicstabilizationwithlimitedrediscectomyforrecurrentlumbardischerniation
AT zhouqiang posteriordynamicstabilizationwithlimitedrediscectomyforrecurrentlumbardischerniation
AT luofei posteriordynamicstabilizationwithlimitedrediscectomyforrecurrentlumbardischerniation
AT lianglichuan posteriordynamicstabilizationwithlimitedrediscectomyforrecurrentlumbardischerniation