Cargando…

Trends of clinical trials from 2017 to 2019 in Korea: an integrated analysis based on the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) and the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) registries

Public disclosure of approved clinical trials in a reliable registry can provide the transparency of the study. Although the registration of clinical trials has increased remarkably, the integrity of the data is not always satisfactory. In this study, we analyzed public clinical trial databases upda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huh, Ki Young, Yu, Kyung-Sang, Lim, Hyeong-Seok, Kim, Hyungsub
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35024359
http://dx.doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2021.29.e24
_version_ 1784624707031531520
author Huh, Ki Young
Yu, Kyung-Sang
Lim, Hyeong-Seok
Kim, Hyungsub
author_facet Huh, Ki Young
Yu, Kyung-Sang
Lim, Hyeong-Seok
Kim, Hyungsub
author_sort Huh, Ki Young
collection PubMed
description Public disclosure of approved clinical trials in a reliable registry can provide the transparency of the study. Although the registration of clinical trials has increased remarkably, the integrity of the data is not always satisfactory. In this study, we analyzed public clinical trial databases updated by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) and Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) registry to provide an overview of the trends of clinical trials approved between 2017 and 2019 in Korea. Information on clinical trials approved between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019 was collected from two databases. Trial information was categorized and summarized by study phase, therapeutic area, and location of the participating centers. A total of 655 to 715 clinical trials were newly approved annually by MFDS during the period from 2017 to 2019. Phase 1 clinical trials accounted for the largest proportion (31.0%), followed by phase 3 (29.5%), investigator-initiated trials (24.1%), phase 2 (14.6%), and phase 4 (0.5%). The number of clinical trials classified as an Antineoplastic and immunomodulating agent was the greatest (40.1%) regardless of the study phase. The similar result was obtained from CRIS registry where therapeutic area Neoplasms (15.9%) accounted for the largest number. The number of clinical trials performed in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do was approximately 70% of the total trials. In conclusion, our study provided a comprehensive overview of clinical trials in Korea from 2017 to 2019. The discrepancy between clinical trial registries could be resolved by introducing standardized database and guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8718355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87183552022-01-11 Trends of clinical trials from 2017 to 2019 in Korea: an integrated analysis based on the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) and the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) registries Huh, Ki Young Yu, Kyung-Sang Lim, Hyeong-Seok Kim, Hyungsub Transl Clin Pharmacol Original Article Public disclosure of approved clinical trials in a reliable registry can provide the transparency of the study. Although the registration of clinical trials has increased remarkably, the integrity of the data is not always satisfactory. In this study, we analyzed public clinical trial databases updated by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) and Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) registry to provide an overview of the trends of clinical trials approved between 2017 and 2019 in Korea. Information on clinical trials approved between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019 was collected from two databases. Trial information was categorized and summarized by study phase, therapeutic area, and location of the participating centers. A total of 655 to 715 clinical trials were newly approved annually by MFDS during the period from 2017 to 2019. Phase 1 clinical trials accounted for the largest proportion (31.0%), followed by phase 3 (29.5%), investigator-initiated trials (24.1%), phase 2 (14.6%), and phase 4 (0.5%). The number of clinical trials classified as an Antineoplastic and immunomodulating agent was the greatest (40.1%) regardless of the study phase. The similar result was obtained from CRIS registry where therapeutic area Neoplasms (15.9%) accounted for the largest number. The number of clinical trials performed in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do was approximately 70% of the total trials. In conclusion, our study provided a comprehensive overview of clinical trials in Korea from 2017 to 2019. The discrepancy between clinical trial registries could be resolved by introducing standardized database and guidelines. Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2021-12 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8718355/ /pubmed/35024359 http://dx.doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2021.29.e24 Text en Copyright © 2021 Translational and Clinical Pharmacology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/It is identical to the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Huh, Ki Young
Yu, Kyung-Sang
Lim, Hyeong-Seok
Kim, Hyungsub
Trends of clinical trials from 2017 to 2019 in Korea: an integrated analysis based on the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) and the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) registries
title Trends of clinical trials from 2017 to 2019 in Korea: an integrated analysis based on the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) and the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) registries
title_full Trends of clinical trials from 2017 to 2019 in Korea: an integrated analysis based on the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) and the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) registries
title_fullStr Trends of clinical trials from 2017 to 2019 in Korea: an integrated analysis based on the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) and the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) registries
title_full_unstemmed Trends of clinical trials from 2017 to 2019 in Korea: an integrated analysis based on the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) and the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) registries
title_short Trends of clinical trials from 2017 to 2019 in Korea: an integrated analysis based on the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) and the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) registries
title_sort trends of clinical trials from 2017 to 2019 in korea: an integrated analysis based on the ministry of food and drug safety (mfds) and the clinical research information service (cris) registries
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35024359
http://dx.doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2021.29.e24
work_keys_str_mv AT huhkiyoung trendsofclinicaltrialsfrom2017to2019inkoreaanintegratedanalysisbasedontheministryoffoodanddrugsafetymfdsandtheclinicalresearchinformationservicecrisregistries
AT yukyungsang trendsofclinicaltrialsfrom2017to2019inkoreaanintegratedanalysisbasedontheministryoffoodanddrugsafetymfdsandtheclinicalresearchinformationservicecrisregistries
AT limhyeongseok trendsofclinicaltrialsfrom2017to2019inkoreaanintegratedanalysisbasedontheministryoffoodanddrugsafetymfdsandtheclinicalresearchinformationservicecrisregistries
AT kimhyungsub trendsofclinicaltrialsfrom2017to2019inkoreaanintegratedanalysisbasedontheministryoffoodanddrugsafetymfdsandtheclinicalresearchinformationservicecrisregistries