Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate antiseptic solution compared to 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine for the prevention of intravenous catheter-related infections (Apollo study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Chlorhexidine alcohol (1.0%–2.0%) is currently recommended as a skin disinfectant to be used prior to catheterisation for preventing catheter-related infections. However, chlorhexidine alcohol has various side effects and has little antibacterial effect on methicillin-resistant Staphyl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718462/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053925 |
_version_ | 1784624731953037312 |
---|---|
author | Yasuda, Hideto Kashiura, Masahiro Kishihara, Yuki Hifumi, Toru Abe, Takayuki Sasaki, Junichi Moriya, Takashi Morikane, Keita Shime, Nobuaki |
author_facet | Yasuda, Hideto Kashiura, Masahiro Kishihara, Yuki Hifumi, Toru Abe, Takayuki Sasaki, Junichi Moriya, Takashi Morikane, Keita Shime, Nobuaki |
author_sort | Yasuda, Hideto |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Chlorhexidine alcohol (1.0%–2.0%) is currently recommended as a skin disinfectant to be used prior to catheterisation for preventing catheter-related infections. However, chlorhexidine alcohol has various side effects and has little antibacterial effect on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Therefore, MRSA remains a concern for catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) prevention. Olanedine, containing 1.5% olanexidine gluconate in aqueous solution, was developed in Japan in 2015 and is structurally similar to chlorhexidine. Olanexine has been used as a disinfectant against various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and MRSA. This study aims to compare the efficacy of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate and 1% chlorhexidine alcohol as skin antiseptics for the prevention of catheter-related infections. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This Apollo study is an open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, two-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial conducted at 21 intensive care units (ICUs) and high-care units (HCUs) in Japan. All patients scheduled to be admitted to the ICU or HCU of a facility participating in this study, who require central venous catheter insertion are eligible. Eligible patients will be assigned to either the 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate or 1% chlorhexidine alcohol group by randomisation in a ratio of 1:1 with stratification by centres. The antibacterial agents are to be used as a skin disinfectant before and during catheter placement. The primary endpoint is the proportion of catheter-related infections, defined as a composite of catheter-related sepsis without bacteraemia and CRBSI. A total of 1980 patients will be included in this study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This clinical trial was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Jichi Medical University and the ethics committees of the participating institutions. The study results will be disseminated through conferences, peer-reviewed publications and meetings with interested parties. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: University hospital Medical Information Network (registration ID: UMIN000042343). This registration includes all items in the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. PROTOCOL VERSION: This protocol corresponds to the original protocol version 5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8718462 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87184622022-01-12 Efficacy and safety of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate antiseptic solution compared to 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine for the prevention of intravenous catheter-related infections (Apollo study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial Yasuda, Hideto Kashiura, Masahiro Kishihara, Yuki Hifumi, Toru Abe, Takayuki Sasaki, Junichi Moriya, Takashi Morikane, Keita Shime, Nobuaki BMJ Open Infectious Diseases INTRODUCTION: Chlorhexidine alcohol (1.0%–2.0%) is currently recommended as a skin disinfectant to be used prior to catheterisation for preventing catheter-related infections. However, chlorhexidine alcohol has various side effects and has little antibacterial effect on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Therefore, MRSA remains a concern for catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) prevention. Olanedine, containing 1.5% olanexidine gluconate in aqueous solution, was developed in Japan in 2015 and is structurally similar to chlorhexidine. Olanexine has been used as a disinfectant against various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and MRSA. This study aims to compare the efficacy of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate and 1% chlorhexidine alcohol as skin antiseptics for the prevention of catheter-related infections. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This Apollo study is an open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, two-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial conducted at 21 intensive care units (ICUs) and high-care units (HCUs) in Japan. All patients scheduled to be admitted to the ICU or HCU of a facility participating in this study, who require central venous catheter insertion are eligible. Eligible patients will be assigned to either the 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate or 1% chlorhexidine alcohol group by randomisation in a ratio of 1:1 with stratification by centres. The antibacterial agents are to be used as a skin disinfectant before and during catheter placement. The primary endpoint is the proportion of catheter-related infections, defined as a composite of catheter-related sepsis without bacteraemia and CRBSI. A total of 1980 patients will be included in this study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This clinical trial was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Jichi Medical University and the ethics committees of the participating institutions. The study results will be disseminated through conferences, peer-reviewed publications and meetings with interested parties. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: University hospital Medical Information Network (registration ID: UMIN000042343). This registration includes all items in the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. PROTOCOL VERSION: This protocol corresponds to the original protocol version 5. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8718462/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053925 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Infectious Diseases Yasuda, Hideto Kashiura, Masahiro Kishihara, Yuki Hifumi, Toru Abe, Takayuki Sasaki, Junichi Moriya, Takashi Morikane, Keita Shime, Nobuaki Efficacy and safety of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate antiseptic solution compared to 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine for the prevention of intravenous catheter-related infections (Apollo study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | Efficacy and safety of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate antiseptic solution compared to 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine for the prevention of intravenous catheter-related infections (Apollo study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate antiseptic solution compared to 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine for the prevention of intravenous catheter-related infections (Apollo study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate antiseptic solution compared to 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine for the prevention of intravenous catheter-related infections (Apollo study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate antiseptic solution compared to 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine for the prevention of intravenous catheter-related infections (Apollo study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate antiseptic solution compared to 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine for the prevention of intravenous catheter-related infections (Apollo study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate antiseptic solution compared to 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine for the prevention of intravenous catheter-related infections (apollo study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Infectious Diseases |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718462/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053925 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yasudahideto efficacyandsafetyof15aqueousolanexidinegluconateantisepticsolutioncomparedto1alcoholicchlorhexidineforthepreventionofintravenouscatheterrelatedinfectionsapollostudyaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kashiuramasahiro efficacyandsafetyof15aqueousolanexidinegluconateantisepticsolutioncomparedto1alcoholicchlorhexidineforthepreventionofintravenouscatheterrelatedinfectionsapollostudyaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kishiharayuki efficacyandsafetyof15aqueousolanexidinegluconateantisepticsolutioncomparedto1alcoholicchlorhexidineforthepreventionofintravenouscatheterrelatedinfectionsapollostudyaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hifumitoru efficacyandsafetyof15aqueousolanexidinegluconateantisepticsolutioncomparedto1alcoholicchlorhexidineforthepreventionofintravenouscatheterrelatedinfectionsapollostudyaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT abetakayuki efficacyandsafetyof15aqueousolanexidinegluconateantisepticsolutioncomparedto1alcoholicchlorhexidineforthepreventionofintravenouscatheterrelatedinfectionsapollostudyaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sasakijunichi efficacyandsafetyof15aqueousolanexidinegluconateantisepticsolutioncomparedto1alcoholicchlorhexidineforthepreventionofintravenouscatheterrelatedinfectionsapollostudyaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT moriyatakashi efficacyandsafetyof15aqueousolanexidinegluconateantisepticsolutioncomparedto1alcoholicchlorhexidineforthepreventionofintravenouscatheterrelatedinfectionsapollostudyaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT morikanekeita efficacyandsafetyof15aqueousolanexidinegluconateantisepticsolutioncomparedto1alcoholicchlorhexidineforthepreventionofintravenouscatheterrelatedinfectionsapollostudyaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT shimenobuaki efficacyandsafetyof15aqueousolanexidinegluconateantisepticsolutioncomparedto1alcoholicchlorhexidineforthepreventionofintravenouscatheterrelatedinfectionsapollostudyaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |