Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate antiseptic solution compared to 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine for the prevention of intravenous catheter-related infections (Apollo study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Chlorhexidine alcohol (1.0%–2.0%) is currently recommended as a skin disinfectant to be used prior to catheterisation for preventing catheter-related infections. However, chlorhexidine alcohol has various side effects and has little antibacterial effect on methicillin-resistant Staphyl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yasuda, Hideto, Kashiura, Masahiro, Kishihara, Yuki, Hifumi, Toru, Abe, Takayuki, Sasaki, Junichi, Moriya, Takashi, Morikane, Keita, Shime, Nobuaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718462/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053925
_version_ 1784624731953037312
author Yasuda, Hideto
Kashiura, Masahiro
Kishihara, Yuki
Hifumi, Toru
Abe, Takayuki
Sasaki, Junichi
Moriya, Takashi
Morikane, Keita
Shime, Nobuaki
author_facet Yasuda, Hideto
Kashiura, Masahiro
Kishihara, Yuki
Hifumi, Toru
Abe, Takayuki
Sasaki, Junichi
Moriya, Takashi
Morikane, Keita
Shime, Nobuaki
author_sort Yasuda, Hideto
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Chlorhexidine alcohol (1.0%–2.0%) is currently recommended as a skin disinfectant to be used prior to catheterisation for preventing catheter-related infections. However, chlorhexidine alcohol has various side effects and has little antibacterial effect on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Therefore, MRSA remains a concern for catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) prevention. Olanedine, containing 1.5% olanexidine gluconate in aqueous solution, was developed in Japan in 2015 and is structurally similar to chlorhexidine. Olanexine has been used as a disinfectant against various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and MRSA. This study aims to compare the efficacy of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate and 1% chlorhexidine alcohol as skin antiseptics for the prevention of catheter-related infections. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This Apollo study is an open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, two-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial conducted at 21 intensive care units (ICUs) and high-care units (HCUs) in Japan. All patients scheduled to be admitted to the ICU or HCU of a facility participating in this study, who require central venous catheter insertion are eligible. Eligible patients will be assigned to either the 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate or 1% chlorhexidine alcohol group by randomisation in a ratio of 1:1 with stratification by centres. The antibacterial agents are to be used as a skin disinfectant before and during catheter placement. The primary endpoint is the proportion of catheter-related infections, defined as a composite of catheter-related sepsis without bacteraemia and CRBSI. A total of 1980 patients will be included in this study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This clinical trial was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Jichi Medical University and the ethics committees of the participating institutions. The study results will be disseminated through conferences, peer-reviewed publications and meetings with interested parties. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: University hospital Medical Information Network (registration ID: UMIN000042343). This registration includes all items in the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. PROTOCOL VERSION: This protocol corresponds to the original protocol version 5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8718462
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87184622022-01-12 Efficacy and safety of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate antiseptic solution compared to 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine for the prevention of intravenous catheter-related infections (Apollo study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial Yasuda, Hideto Kashiura, Masahiro Kishihara, Yuki Hifumi, Toru Abe, Takayuki Sasaki, Junichi Moriya, Takashi Morikane, Keita Shime, Nobuaki BMJ Open Infectious Diseases INTRODUCTION: Chlorhexidine alcohol (1.0%–2.0%) is currently recommended as a skin disinfectant to be used prior to catheterisation for preventing catheter-related infections. However, chlorhexidine alcohol has various side effects and has little antibacterial effect on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Therefore, MRSA remains a concern for catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) prevention. Olanedine, containing 1.5% olanexidine gluconate in aqueous solution, was developed in Japan in 2015 and is structurally similar to chlorhexidine. Olanexine has been used as a disinfectant against various gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and MRSA. This study aims to compare the efficacy of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate and 1% chlorhexidine alcohol as skin antiseptics for the prevention of catheter-related infections. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This Apollo study is an open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, two-arm, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial conducted at 21 intensive care units (ICUs) and high-care units (HCUs) in Japan. All patients scheduled to be admitted to the ICU or HCU of a facility participating in this study, who require central venous catheter insertion are eligible. Eligible patients will be assigned to either the 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate or 1% chlorhexidine alcohol group by randomisation in a ratio of 1:1 with stratification by centres. The antibacterial agents are to be used as a skin disinfectant before and during catheter placement. The primary endpoint is the proportion of catheter-related infections, defined as a composite of catheter-related sepsis without bacteraemia and CRBSI. A total of 1980 patients will be included in this study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This clinical trial was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Jichi Medical University and the ethics committees of the participating institutions. The study results will be disseminated through conferences, peer-reviewed publications and meetings with interested parties. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: University hospital Medical Information Network (registration ID: UMIN000042343). This registration includes all items in the WHO Trial Registration Data Set. PROTOCOL VERSION: This protocol corresponds to the original protocol version 5. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8718462/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053925 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Infectious Diseases
Yasuda, Hideto
Kashiura, Masahiro
Kishihara, Yuki
Hifumi, Toru
Abe, Takayuki
Sasaki, Junichi
Moriya, Takashi
Morikane, Keita
Shime, Nobuaki
Efficacy and safety of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate antiseptic solution compared to 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine for the prevention of intravenous catheter-related infections (Apollo study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Efficacy and safety of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate antiseptic solution compared to 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine for the prevention of intravenous catheter-related infections (Apollo study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Efficacy and safety of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate antiseptic solution compared to 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine for the prevention of intravenous catheter-related infections (Apollo study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate antiseptic solution compared to 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine for the prevention of intravenous catheter-related infections (Apollo study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate antiseptic solution compared to 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine for the prevention of intravenous catheter-related infections (Apollo study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Efficacy and safety of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate antiseptic solution compared to 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine for the prevention of intravenous catheter-related infections (Apollo study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort efficacy and safety of 1.5% aqueous olanexidine gluconate antiseptic solution compared to 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine for the prevention of intravenous catheter-related infections (apollo study): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Infectious Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718462/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053925
work_keys_str_mv AT yasudahideto efficacyandsafetyof15aqueousolanexidinegluconateantisepticsolutioncomparedto1alcoholicchlorhexidineforthepreventionofintravenouscatheterrelatedinfectionsapollostudyaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kashiuramasahiro efficacyandsafetyof15aqueousolanexidinegluconateantisepticsolutioncomparedto1alcoholicchlorhexidineforthepreventionofintravenouscatheterrelatedinfectionsapollostudyaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kishiharayuki efficacyandsafetyof15aqueousolanexidinegluconateantisepticsolutioncomparedto1alcoholicchlorhexidineforthepreventionofintravenouscatheterrelatedinfectionsapollostudyaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hifumitoru efficacyandsafetyof15aqueousolanexidinegluconateantisepticsolutioncomparedto1alcoholicchlorhexidineforthepreventionofintravenouscatheterrelatedinfectionsapollostudyaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT abetakayuki efficacyandsafetyof15aqueousolanexidinegluconateantisepticsolutioncomparedto1alcoholicchlorhexidineforthepreventionofintravenouscatheterrelatedinfectionsapollostudyaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sasakijunichi efficacyandsafetyof15aqueousolanexidinegluconateantisepticsolutioncomparedto1alcoholicchlorhexidineforthepreventionofintravenouscatheterrelatedinfectionsapollostudyaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT moriyatakashi efficacyandsafetyof15aqueousolanexidinegluconateantisepticsolutioncomparedto1alcoholicchlorhexidineforthepreventionofintravenouscatheterrelatedinfectionsapollostudyaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT morikanekeita efficacyandsafetyof15aqueousolanexidinegluconateantisepticsolutioncomparedto1alcoholicchlorhexidineforthepreventionofintravenouscatheterrelatedinfectionsapollostudyaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT shimenobuaki efficacyandsafetyof15aqueousolanexidinegluconateantisepticsolutioncomparedto1alcoholicchlorhexidineforthepreventionofintravenouscatheterrelatedinfectionsapollostudyaprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial