Cargando…

Comparison of the Oncological Efficacy Between Intraoperative Radiotherapy With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and whole-breast irradiation (WBI) are both effective radiotherapeutic interventions for early breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery; however, an issue on whether which one can entail the better prognosis is still controversial. Ou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Lin, Zhou, Jiejing, Qi, Yuhong, He, Dongjie, Yuan, Canliang, Chang, Hao, Wang, Qiming, Li, Gaiyan, Shao, Qiuju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34976808
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.759903
_version_ 1784624766045388800
author He, Lin
Zhou, Jiejing
Qi, Yuhong
He, Dongjie
Yuan, Canliang
Chang, Hao
Wang, Qiming
Li, Gaiyan
Shao, Qiuju
author_facet He, Lin
Zhou, Jiejing
Qi, Yuhong
He, Dongjie
Yuan, Canliang
Chang, Hao
Wang, Qiming
Li, Gaiyan
Shao, Qiuju
author_sort He, Lin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and whole-breast irradiation (WBI) are both effective radiotherapeutic interventions for early breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery; however, an issue on whether which one can entail the better prognosis is still controversial. Our study aimed to investigate the 5-year oncological efficacy of the IORT cohort and the WBI cohort, respectively, and compare the oncological efficacy between the cohorts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a computerized retrieval to identify English published articles between 2000 and 2021 in the PubMed, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and APA PsycInfo databases. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed in duplicate. RESULTS: A total of 38 studies were eligible, with 30,225 analyzed participants. A non-comparative binary meta-analysis was performed to calculate the weighted average 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) in the two cohorts, respectively. The LRFS, DMFS, and OS (without restriction on the 5-year outcomes) between the two cohorts were further investigated by a comparative binary meta-analysis. The weighted average 5-year LRFS, DMFS, and OS in the IORT cohort were 96.3, 96.6, and 94.1%, respectively, and in the WBI cohort were 98.0, 94.9, and 94.9%, respectively. Our pooled results indicated that the LRFS in the IORT cohort was significantly lower than that in the WBI cohort (pooled odds ratio [OR] = 2.36; 95% confidential interval [CI], 1.66–3.36). Nevertheless, the comparisons of DMFS (pooled OR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.76–1.31), and OS (pooled OR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.79–1.14) between the IORT cohort with the WBI cohort were both not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the drastically high 5-year oncological efficacy in both cohorts, the LRFS in the IORT cohort is significantly poorer than that in the WBI cohort, and DMFS and OS do not differ between cohorts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8718609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87186092022-01-01 Comparison of the Oncological Efficacy Between Intraoperative Radiotherapy With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis He, Lin Zhou, Jiejing Qi, Yuhong He, Dongjie Yuan, Canliang Chang, Hao Wang, Qiming Li, Gaiyan Shao, Qiuju Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and whole-breast irradiation (WBI) are both effective radiotherapeutic interventions for early breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery; however, an issue on whether which one can entail the better prognosis is still controversial. Our study aimed to investigate the 5-year oncological efficacy of the IORT cohort and the WBI cohort, respectively, and compare the oncological efficacy between the cohorts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a computerized retrieval to identify English published articles between 2000 and 2021 in the PubMed, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and APA PsycInfo databases. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed in duplicate. RESULTS: A total of 38 studies were eligible, with 30,225 analyzed participants. A non-comparative binary meta-analysis was performed to calculate the weighted average 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) in the two cohorts, respectively. The LRFS, DMFS, and OS (without restriction on the 5-year outcomes) between the two cohorts were further investigated by a comparative binary meta-analysis. The weighted average 5-year LRFS, DMFS, and OS in the IORT cohort were 96.3, 96.6, and 94.1%, respectively, and in the WBI cohort were 98.0, 94.9, and 94.9%, respectively. Our pooled results indicated that the LRFS in the IORT cohort was significantly lower than that in the WBI cohort (pooled odds ratio [OR] = 2.36; 95% confidential interval [CI], 1.66–3.36). Nevertheless, the comparisons of DMFS (pooled OR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.76–1.31), and OS (pooled OR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.79–1.14) between the IORT cohort with the WBI cohort were both not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the drastically high 5-year oncological efficacy in both cohorts, the LRFS in the IORT cohort is significantly poorer than that in the WBI cohort, and DMFS and OS do not differ between cohorts. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8718609/ /pubmed/34976808 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.759903 Text en Copyright © 2021 He, Zhou, Qi, He, Yuan, Chang, Wang, Li and Shao https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
He, Lin
Zhou, Jiejing
Qi, Yuhong
He, Dongjie
Yuan, Canliang
Chang, Hao
Wang, Qiming
Li, Gaiyan
Shao, Qiuju
Comparison of the Oncological Efficacy Between Intraoperative Radiotherapy With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title Comparison of the Oncological Efficacy Between Intraoperative Radiotherapy With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparison of the Oncological Efficacy Between Intraoperative Radiotherapy With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of the Oncological Efficacy Between Intraoperative Radiotherapy With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Oncological Efficacy Between Intraoperative Radiotherapy With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparison of the Oncological Efficacy Between Intraoperative Radiotherapy With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparison of the oncological efficacy between intraoperative radiotherapy with whole-breast irradiation for early breast cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34976808
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.759903
work_keys_str_mv AT helin comparisonoftheoncologicalefficacybetweenintraoperativeradiotherapywithwholebreastirradiationforearlybreastcancerametaanalysis
AT zhoujiejing comparisonoftheoncologicalefficacybetweenintraoperativeradiotherapywithwholebreastirradiationforearlybreastcancerametaanalysis
AT qiyuhong comparisonoftheoncologicalefficacybetweenintraoperativeradiotherapywithwholebreastirradiationforearlybreastcancerametaanalysis
AT hedongjie comparisonoftheoncologicalefficacybetweenintraoperativeradiotherapywithwholebreastirradiationforearlybreastcancerametaanalysis
AT yuancanliang comparisonoftheoncologicalefficacybetweenintraoperativeradiotherapywithwholebreastirradiationforearlybreastcancerametaanalysis
AT changhao comparisonoftheoncologicalefficacybetweenintraoperativeradiotherapywithwholebreastirradiationforearlybreastcancerametaanalysis
AT wangqiming comparisonoftheoncologicalefficacybetweenintraoperativeradiotherapywithwholebreastirradiationforearlybreastcancerametaanalysis
AT ligaiyan comparisonoftheoncologicalefficacybetweenintraoperativeradiotherapywithwholebreastirradiationforearlybreastcancerametaanalysis
AT shaoqiuju comparisonoftheoncologicalefficacybetweenintraoperativeradiotherapywithwholebreastirradiationforearlybreastcancerametaanalysis