Cargando…
Comparison of the Oncological Efficacy Between Intraoperative Radiotherapy With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and whole-breast irradiation (WBI) are both effective radiotherapeutic interventions for early breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery; however, an issue on whether which one can entail the better prognosis is still controversial. Ou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34976808 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.759903 |
_version_ | 1784624766045388800 |
---|---|
author | He, Lin Zhou, Jiejing Qi, Yuhong He, Dongjie Yuan, Canliang Chang, Hao Wang, Qiming Li, Gaiyan Shao, Qiuju |
author_facet | He, Lin Zhou, Jiejing Qi, Yuhong He, Dongjie Yuan, Canliang Chang, Hao Wang, Qiming Li, Gaiyan Shao, Qiuju |
author_sort | He, Lin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and whole-breast irradiation (WBI) are both effective radiotherapeutic interventions for early breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery; however, an issue on whether which one can entail the better prognosis is still controversial. Our study aimed to investigate the 5-year oncological efficacy of the IORT cohort and the WBI cohort, respectively, and compare the oncological efficacy between the cohorts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a computerized retrieval to identify English published articles between 2000 and 2021 in the PubMed, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and APA PsycInfo databases. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed in duplicate. RESULTS: A total of 38 studies were eligible, with 30,225 analyzed participants. A non-comparative binary meta-analysis was performed to calculate the weighted average 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) in the two cohorts, respectively. The LRFS, DMFS, and OS (without restriction on the 5-year outcomes) between the two cohorts were further investigated by a comparative binary meta-analysis. The weighted average 5-year LRFS, DMFS, and OS in the IORT cohort were 96.3, 96.6, and 94.1%, respectively, and in the WBI cohort were 98.0, 94.9, and 94.9%, respectively. Our pooled results indicated that the LRFS in the IORT cohort was significantly lower than that in the WBI cohort (pooled odds ratio [OR] = 2.36; 95% confidential interval [CI], 1.66–3.36). Nevertheless, the comparisons of DMFS (pooled OR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.76–1.31), and OS (pooled OR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.79–1.14) between the IORT cohort with the WBI cohort were both not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the drastically high 5-year oncological efficacy in both cohorts, the LRFS in the IORT cohort is significantly poorer than that in the WBI cohort, and DMFS and OS do not differ between cohorts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8718609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87186092022-01-01 Comparison of the Oncological Efficacy Between Intraoperative Radiotherapy With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis He, Lin Zhou, Jiejing Qi, Yuhong He, Dongjie Yuan, Canliang Chang, Hao Wang, Qiming Li, Gaiyan Shao, Qiuju Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and whole-breast irradiation (WBI) are both effective radiotherapeutic interventions for early breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery; however, an issue on whether which one can entail the better prognosis is still controversial. Our study aimed to investigate the 5-year oncological efficacy of the IORT cohort and the WBI cohort, respectively, and compare the oncological efficacy between the cohorts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a computerized retrieval to identify English published articles between 2000 and 2021 in the PubMed, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and APA PsycInfo databases. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed in duplicate. RESULTS: A total of 38 studies were eligible, with 30,225 analyzed participants. A non-comparative binary meta-analysis was performed to calculate the weighted average 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) in the two cohorts, respectively. The LRFS, DMFS, and OS (without restriction on the 5-year outcomes) between the two cohorts were further investigated by a comparative binary meta-analysis. The weighted average 5-year LRFS, DMFS, and OS in the IORT cohort were 96.3, 96.6, and 94.1%, respectively, and in the WBI cohort were 98.0, 94.9, and 94.9%, respectively. Our pooled results indicated that the LRFS in the IORT cohort was significantly lower than that in the WBI cohort (pooled odds ratio [OR] = 2.36; 95% confidential interval [CI], 1.66–3.36). Nevertheless, the comparisons of DMFS (pooled OR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.76–1.31), and OS (pooled OR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.79–1.14) between the IORT cohort with the WBI cohort were both not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the drastically high 5-year oncological efficacy in both cohorts, the LRFS in the IORT cohort is significantly poorer than that in the WBI cohort, and DMFS and OS do not differ between cohorts. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8718609/ /pubmed/34976808 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.759903 Text en Copyright © 2021 He, Zhou, Qi, He, Yuan, Chang, Wang, Li and Shao https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology He, Lin Zhou, Jiejing Qi, Yuhong He, Dongjie Yuan, Canliang Chang, Hao Wang, Qiming Li, Gaiyan Shao, Qiuju Comparison of the Oncological Efficacy Between Intraoperative Radiotherapy With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Comparison of the Oncological Efficacy Between Intraoperative Radiotherapy With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Comparison of the Oncological Efficacy Between Intraoperative Radiotherapy With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Oncological Efficacy Between Intraoperative Radiotherapy With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Oncological Efficacy Between Intraoperative Radiotherapy With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Comparison of the Oncological Efficacy Between Intraoperative Radiotherapy With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | comparison of the oncological efficacy between intraoperative radiotherapy with whole-breast irradiation for early breast cancer: a meta-analysis |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34976808 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.759903 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT helin comparisonoftheoncologicalefficacybetweenintraoperativeradiotherapywithwholebreastirradiationforearlybreastcancerametaanalysis AT zhoujiejing comparisonoftheoncologicalefficacybetweenintraoperativeradiotherapywithwholebreastirradiationforearlybreastcancerametaanalysis AT qiyuhong comparisonoftheoncologicalefficacybetweenintraoperativeradiotherapywithwholebreastirradiationforearlybreastcancerametaanalysis AT hedongjie comparisonoftheoncologicalefficacybetweenintraoperativeradiotherapywithwholebreastirradiationforearlybreastcancerametaanalysis AT yuancanliang comparisonoftheoncologicalefficacybetweenintraoperativeradiotherapywithwholebreastirradiationforearlybreastcancerametaanalysis AT changhao comparisonoftheoncologicalefficacybetweenintraoperativeradiotherapywithwholebreastirradiationforearlybreastcancerametaanalysis AT wangqiming comparisonoftheoncologicalefficacybetweenintraoperativeradiotherapywithwholebreastirradiationforearlybreastcancerametaanalysis AT ligaiyan comparisonoftheoncologicalefficacybetweenintraoperativeradiotherapywithwholebreastirradiationforearlybreastcancerametaanalysis AT shaoqiuju comparisonoftheoncologicalefficacybetweenintraoperativeradiotherapywithwholebreastirradiationforearlybreastcancerametaanalysis |