Cargando…

Relationship of admission blood proteomic biomarkers levels to lesion type and lesion burden in traumatic brain injury: A CENTER-TBI study

BACKGROUND: We aimed to understand the relationship between serum biomarker concentration and lesion type and volume found on computed tomography (CT) following all severities of TBI. METHODS: Concentrations of six serum biomarkers (GFAP, NFL, NSE, S100B, t-tau and UCH-L1) were measured in samples o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whitehouse, Daniel P., Monteiro, Miguel, Czeiter, Endre, Vyvere, Thijs Vande, Valerio, Fernanda, Ye, Zheng, Amrein, Krisztina, Kamnitsas, Konstantinos, Xu, Haiyan, Yang, Zhihui, Verheyden, Jan, Das, Tilak, Kornaropoulos, Evgenios N., Steyerberg, Ewout, Maas, Andrew I.R., Wang, Kevin K.W., Büki, András, Glocker, Ben, Menon, David K., Newcombe, Virginia F.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34959133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103777
_version_ 1784624828045590528
author Whitehouse, Daniel P.
Monteiro, Miguel
Czeiter, Endre
Vyvere, Thijs Vande
Valerio, Fernanda
Ye, Zheng
Amrein, Krisztina
Kamnitsas, Konstantinos
Xu, Haiyan
Yang, Zhihui
Verheyden, Jan
Das, Tilak
Kornaropoulos, Evgenios N.
Steyerberg, Ewout
Maas, Andrew I.R.
Wang, Kevin K.W.
Büki, András
Glocker, Ben
Menon, David K.
Newcombe, Virginia F.J.
author_facet Whitehouse, Daniel P.
Monteiro, Miguel
Czeiter, Endre
Vyvere, Thijs Vande
Valerio, Fernanda
Ye, Zheng
Amrein, Krisztina
Kamnitsas, Konstantinos
Xu, Haiyan
Yang, Zhihui
Verheyden, Jan
Das, Tilak
Kornaropoulos, Evgenios N.
Steyerberg, Ewout
Maas, Andrew I.R.
Wang, Kevin K.W.
Büki, András
Glocker, Ben
Menon, David K.
Newcombe, Virginia F.J.
author_sort Whitehouse, Daniel P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to understand the relationship between serum biomarker concentration and lesion type and volume found on computed tomography (CT) following all severities of TBI. METHODS: Concentrations of six serum biomarkers (GFAP, NFL, NSE, S100B, t-tau and UCH-L1) were measured in samples obtained <24 hours post-injury from 2869 patients with all severities of TBI, enrolled in the CENTER-TBI prospective cohort study (NCT02210221). Imaging phenotypes were defined as intraparenchymal haemorrhage (IPH), oedema, subdural haematoma (SDH), extradural haematoma (EDH), traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage (tSAH), diffuse axonal injury (DAI), and intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH). Multivariable polynomial regression was performed to examine the association between biomarker levels and both distinct lesion types and lesion volumes. Hierarchical clustering was used to explore imaging phenotypes; and principal component analysis and k-means clustering of acute biomarker concentrations to explore patterns of biomarker clustering. FINDINGS: 2869 patient were included, 68% (n=1946) male with a median age of 49 years (range 2-96). All severities of TBI (mild, moderate and severe) were included for analysis with majority (n=1946, 68%) having a mild injury (GCS 13-15). Patients with severe diffuse injury (Marshall III/IV) showed significantly higher levels of all measured biomarkers, with the exception of NFL, than patients with focal mass lesions (Marshall grades V/VI). Patients with either DAI+IVH or SDH+IPH+tSAH, had significantly higher biomarker concentrations than patients with EDH. Higher biomarker concentrations were associated with greater volume of IPH (GFAP, S100B, t-tau;adj r2 range:0·48-0·49; p<0·05), oedema (GFAP, NFL, NSE, t-tau, UCH-L1;adj r2 range:0·44-0·44; p<0·01), IVH (S100B;adj r2 range:0.48-0.49; p<0.05), Unsupervised k-means biomarker clustering revealed two clusters explaining 83·9% of variance, with phenotyping characteristics related to clinical injury severity. INTERPRETATION: Interpretation: Biomarker concentration within 24 hours of TBI is primarily related to severity of injury and intracranial disease burden, rather than pathoanatomical type of injury. FUNDING: CENTER-TBI is funded by the European Union 7th Framework programme (EC grant 602150).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8718895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87188952022-01-07 Relationship of admission blood proteomic biomarkers levels to lesion type and lesion burden in traumatic brain injury: A CENTER-TBI study Whitehouse, Daniel P. Monteiro, Miguel Czeiter, Endre Vyvere, Thijs Vande Valerio, Fernanda Ye, Zheng Amrein, Krisztina Kamnitsas, Konstantinos Xu, Haiyan Yang, Zhihui Verheyden, Jan Das, Tilak Kornaropoulos, Evgenios N. Steyerberg, Ewout Maas, Andrew I.R. Wang, Kevin K.W. Büki, András Glocker, Ben Menon, David K. Newcombe, Virginia F.J. EBioMedicine Article BACKGROUND: We aimed to understand the relationship between serum biomarker concentration and lesion type and volume found on computed tomography (CT) following all severities of TBI. METHODS: Concentrations of six serum biomarkers (GFAP, NFL, NSE, S100B, t-tau and UCH-L1) were measured in samples obtained <24 hours post-injury from 2869 patients with all severities of TBI, enrolled in the CENTER-TBI prospective cohort study (NCT02210221). Imaging phenotypes were defined as intraparenchymal haemorrhage (IPH), oedema, subdural haematoma (SDH), extradural haematoma (EDH), traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage (tSAH), diffuse axonal injury (DAI), and intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH). Multivariable polynomial regression was performed to examine the association between biomarker levels and both distinct lesion types and lesion volumes. Hierarchical clustering was used to explore imaging phenotypes; and principal component analysis and k-means clustering of acute biomarker concentrations to explore patterns of biomarker clustering. FINDINGS: 2869 patient were included, 68% (n=1946) male with a median age of 49 years (range 2-96). All severities of TBI (mild, moderate and severe) were included for analysis with majority (n=1946, 68%) having a mild injury (GCS 13-15). Patients with severe diffuse injury (Marshall III/IV) showed significantly higher levels of all measured biomarkers, with the exception of NFL, than patients with focal mass lesions (Marshall grades V/VI). Patients with either DAI+IVH or SDH+IPH+tSAH, had significantly higher biomarker concentrations than patients with EDH. Higher biomarker concentrations were associated with greater volume of IPH (GFAP, S100B, t-tau;adj r2 range:0·48-0·49; p<0·05), oedema (GFAP, NFL, NSE, t-tau, UCH-L1;adj r2 range:0·44-0·44; p<0·01), IVH (S100B;adj r2 range:0.48-0.49; p<0.05), Unsupervised k-means biomarker clustering revealed two clusters explaining 83·9% of variance, with phenotyping characteristics related to clinical injury severity. INTERPRETATION: Interpretation: Biomarker concentration within 24 hours of TBI is primarily related to severity of injury and intracranial disease burden, rather than pathoanatomical type of injury. FUNDING: CENTER-TBI is funded by the European Union 7th Framework programme (EC grant 602150). Elsevier 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8718895/ /pubmed/34959133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103777 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Whitehouse, Daniel P.
Monteiro, Miguel
Czeiter, Endre
Vyvere, Thijs Vande
Valerio, Fernanda
Ye, Zheng
Amrein, Krisztina
Kamnitsas, Konstantinos
Xu, Haiyan
Yang, Zhihui
Verheyden, Jan
Das, Tilak
Kornaropoulos, Evgenios N.
Steyerberg, Ewout
Maas, Andrew I.R.
Wang, Kevin K.W.
Büki, András
Glocker, Ben
Menon, David K.
Newcombe, Virginia F.J.
Relationship of admission blood proteomic biomarkers levels to lesion type and lesion burden in traumatic brain injury: A CENTER-TBI study
title Relationship of admission blood proteomic biomarkers levels to lesion type and lesion burden in traumatic brain injury: A CENTER-TBI study
title_full Relationship of admission blood proteomic biomarkers levels to lesion type and lesion burden in traumatic brain injury: A CENTER-TBI study
title_fullStr Relationship of admission blood proteomic biomarkers levels to lesion type and lesion burden in traumatic brain injury: A CENTER-TBI study
title_full_unstemmed Relationship of admission blood proteomic biomarkers levels to lesion type and lesion burden in traumatic brain injury: A CENTER-TBI study
title_short Relationship of admission blood proteomic biomarkers levels to lesion type and lesion burden in traumatic brain injury: A CENTER-TBI study
title_sort relationship of admission blood proteomic biomarkers levels to lesion type and lesion burden in traumatic brain injury: a center-tbi study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34959133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103777
work_keys_str_mv AT whitehousedanielp relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT monteiromiguel relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT czeiterendre relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT vyverethijsvande relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT valeriofernanda relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT yezheng relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT amreinkrisztina relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT kamnitsaskonstantinos relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT xuhaiyan relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT yangzhihui relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT verheydenjan relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT dastilak relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT kornaropoulosevgeniosn relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT steyerbergewout relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT maasandrewir relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT wangkevinkw relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT bukiandras relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT glockerben relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT menondavidk relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT newcombevirginiafj relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy
AT relationshipofadmissionbloodproteomicbiomarkerslevelstolesiontypeandlesionburdenintraumaticbraininjuryacentertbistudy