Cargando…

Differences in Immune Response During Competition and Preparation Phase in Elite Rowers

Background: Metabolic stress is high during training and competition of Olympic rowers, but there is a lack of biomedical markers allowing to quantify training load on the molecular level. We aimed to identify such markers applying a complex approach involving inflammatory and immunologic variables....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bizjak, Daniel Alexander, Treff, Gunnar, Zügel, Martina, Schumann, Uwe, Winkert, Kay, Schneider, Marion, Abendroth, Dietmar, Steinacker, Jürgen Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34975545
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.803863
_version_ 1784624835928784896
author Bizjak, Daniel Alexander
Treff, Gunnar
Zügel, Martina
Schumann, Uwe
Winkert, Kay
Schneider, Marion
Abendroth, Dietmar
Steinacker, Jürgen Michael
author_facet Bizjak, Daniel Alexander
Treff, Gunnar
Zügel, Martina
Schumann, Uwe
Winkert, Kay
Schneider, Marion
Abendroth, Dietmar
Steinacker, Jürgen Michael
author_sort Bizjak, Daniel Alexander
collection PubMed
description Background: Metabolic stress is high during training and competition of Olympic rowers, but there is a lack of biomedical markers allowing to quantify training load on the molecular level. We aimed to identify such markers applying a complex approach involving inflammatory and immunologic variables. Methods: Eleven international elite male rowers (age 22.7 ± 2.4 yrs.; VO(2)max 71 ± 5 ml·min(−1)·kg(−1)) of the German National Rowing team were monitored at competition phase (COMP) vs. preparation phase (PREP), representing high vs. low load. Perceived stress and recovery were assessed by a Recovery Stress Questionnaire for Athletes (RESTQ-76 Sport). Immune cell activation (dendritic cell (DC)/macrophage/monocytes/T-cells) was evaluated via fluorescent activated cell sorting. Cytokines, High-Mobility Group Protein B1 (HMGB1), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), creatine kinase (CK), uric acid (UA), and kynurenine (KYN) were measured in venous blood. Results: Rowers experienced more general stress and less recovery during COMP, but sports-related stress and recovery did not differ from PREP. During COMP, DC/macrophage/monocyte and T-regulatory cells (T(reg)-cell) increased (p = 0.001 and 0.010). HMGB1 and cfDNA increased in most athletes during COMP (p = 0.001 and 0.048), while CK, UA, and KYN remained unaltered (p = 0.053, 0.304, and 0.211). Pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β (p = 0.002), TNF-α (p < 0.001), and the chemokine IL-8 (p = 0.001) were elevated during COMP, while anti-inflammatory Il-10 was lower (p = 0.002). Conclusion: COMP resulted in an increase in biomarkers reflecting tissue damage, with plausible evidence of immune cell activation that appeared to be compensated by anti-inflammatory mechanisms, such as T(reg)-cell proliferation. We suggest an anti-inflammatory and immunological matrix approach to optimize training load quantification in elite athletes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8718927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87189272022-01-01 Differences in Immune Response During Competition and Preparation Phase in Elite Rowers Bizjak, Daniel Alexander Treff, Gunnar Zügel, Martina Schumann, Uwe Winkert, Kay Schneider, Marion Abendroth, Dietmar Steinacker, Jürgen Michael Front Physiol Physiology Background: Metabolic stress is high during training and competition of Olympic rowers, but there is a lack of biomedical markers allowing to quantify training load on the molecular level. We aimed to identify such markers applying a complex approach involving inflammatory and immunologic variables. Methods: Eleven international elite male rowers (age 22.7 ± 2.4 yrs.; VO(2)max 71 ± 5 ml·min(−1)·kg(−1)) of the German National Rowing team were monitored at competition phase (COMP) vs. preparation phase (PREP), representing high vs. low load. Perceived stress and recovery were assessed by a Recovery Stress Questionnaire for Athletes (RESTQ-76 Sport). Immune cell activation (dendritic cell (DC)/macrophage/monocytes/T-cells) was evaluated via fluorescent activated cell sorting. Cytokines, High-Mobility Group Protein B1 (HMGB1), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), creatine kinase (CK), uric acid (UA), and kynurenine (KYN) were measured in venous blood. Results: Rowers experienced more general stress and less recovery during COMP, but sports-related stress and recovery did not differ from PREP. During COMP, DC/macrophage/monocyte and T-regulatory cells (T(reg)-cell) increased (p = 0.001 and 0.010). HMGB1 and cfDNA increased in most athletes during COMP (p = 0.001 and 0.048), while CK, UA, and KYN remained unaltered (p = 0.053, 0.304, and 0.211). Pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β (p = 0.002), TNF-α (p < 0.001), and the chemokine IL-8 (p = 0.001) were elevated during COMP, while anti-inflammatory Il-10 was lower (p = 0.002). Conclusion: COMP resulted in an increase in biomarkers reflecting tissue damage, with plausible evidence of immune cell activation that appeared to be compensated by anti-inflammatory mechanisms, such as T(reg)-cell proliferation. We suggest an anti-inflammatory and immunological matrix approach to optimize training load quantification in elite athletes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8718927/ /pubmed/34975545 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.803863 Text en Copyright © 2021 Bizjak, Treff, Zügel, Schumann, Winkert, Schneider, Abendroth and Steinacker. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Bizjak, Daniel Alexander
Treff, Gunnar
Zügel, Martina
Schumann, Uwe
Winkert, Kay
Schneider, Marion
Abendroth, Dietmar
Steinacker, Jürgen Michael
Differences in Immune Response During Competition and Preparation Phase in Elite Rowers
title Differences in Immune Response During Competition and Preparation Phase in Elite Rowers
title_full Differences in Immune Response During Competition and Preparation Phase in Elite Rowers
title_fullStr Differences in Immune Response During Competition and Preparation Phase in Elite Rowers
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Immune Response During Competition and Preparation Phase in Elite Rowers
title_short Differences in Immune Response During Competition and Preparation Phase in Elite Rowers
title_sort differences in immune response during competition and preparation phase in elite rowers
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34975545
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.803863
work_keys_str_mv AT bizjakdanielalexander differencesinimmuneresponseduringcompetitionandpreparationphaseineliterowers
AT treffgunnar differencesinimmuneresponseduringcompetitionandpreparationphaseineliterowers
AT zugelmartina differencesinimmuneresponseduringcompetitionandpreparationphaseineliterowers
AT schumannuwe differencesinimmuneresponseduringcompetitionandpreparationphaseineliterowers
AT winkertkay differencesinimmuneresponseduringcompetitionandpreparationphaseineliterowers
AT schneidermarion differencesinimmuneresponseduringcompetitionandpreparationphaseineliterowers
AT abendrothdietmar differencesinimmuneresponseduringcompetitionandpreparationphaseineliterowers
AT steinackerjurgenmichael differencesinimmuneresponseduringcompetitionandpreparationphaseineliterowers