Cargando…

The impact of specialised treatment of low back pain on health care costs and productivity in a nationwide cohort

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is the most common diagnosis responsible for sick leave, long-term disability payments, and early retirements. Studies have suggested that the relatively small proportion of patients referred to a specialist for treatment, either conservative or surgical, accounts for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Solumsmoen, Stian, Poulsen, Gry, Kjellberg, Jakob, Melbye, Mads, Munch, Tina Nørgaard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35005584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101247
_version_ 1784624845133185024
author Solumsmoen, Stian
Poulsen, Gry
Kjellberg, Jakob
Melbye, Mads
Munch, Tina Nørgaard
author_facet Solumsmoen, Stian
Poulsen, Gry
Kjellberg, Jakob
Melbye, Mads
Munch, Tina Nørgaard
author_sort Solumsmoen, Stian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is the most common diagnosis responsible for sick leave, long-term disability payments, and early retirements. Studies have suggested that the relatively small proportion of patients referred to a specialist for treatment, either conservative or surgical, accounts for most of the total costs of back pain. However, a complete and long-term picture of the socioeconomic burden associated with these two treatment regimens is lacking. METHODS: From a cohort encompassing the entire population in Denmark (5.8 million inhabitants), we identified patients with LBP referred to specialised treatment, either conservative or surgical, during 2007–2016. According to treatment modality, two different cohorts were constructed. Each patient was matched with ten background population controls based on age, sex, region of residency and time of treatment (month and year). Using extensive, nationwide register data, the healthcare costs and loss of productivity from two years before the first intervention until 2018 was investigated. FINDINGS: A total of 56,694 patients underwent surgical treatment, and 72,915 patients conservative treatment. Both cohorts had a significantly higher baseline cost two years before treatment compared with the background population controls. These measures increased sharply during the year after treatment. Five years after treatment, healthcare costs and loss of productivity remained proportionally similarly increased for the two treatment groups compared to the background population. Multiple surgeries had detrimental effects on long term productivity for the patients, and spouses to patients had marginally increased loss of productivity. INTERPRETATION: The results show that patients referred to specialised treatment of LBP display poor socioeconomic prognosis, regardless of conservative or surgical treatment modality. This development was reinforced in patients undergoing multiple surgeries and was also observed among spouses to the patients. Our findings of substantial loss of productivity across subgroups indicate that measures of successful treatment need to be more nuanced.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8718977
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87189772022-01-07 The impact of specialised treatment of low back pain on health care costs and productivity in a nationwide cohort Solumsmoen, Stian Poulsen, Gry Kjellberg, Jakob Melbye, Mads Munch, Tina Nørgaard EClinicalMedicine Article BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is the most common diagnosis responsible for sick leave, long-term disability payments, and early retirements. Studies have suggested that the relatively small proportion of patients referred to a specialist for treatment, either conservative or surgical, accounts for most of the total costs of back pain. However, a complete and long-term picture of the socioeconomic burden associated with these two treatment regimens is lacking. METHODS: From a cohort encompassing the entire population in Denmark (5.8 million inhabitants), we identified patients with LBP referred to specialised treatment, either conservative or surgical, during 2007–2016. According to treatment modality, two different cohorts were constructed. Each patient was matched with ten background population controls based on age, sex, region of residency and time of treatment (month and year). Using extensive, nationwide register data, the healthcare costs and loss of productivity from two years before the first intervention until 2018 was investigated. FINDINGS: A total of 56,694 patients underwent surgical treatment, and 72,915 patients conservative treatment. Both cohorts had a significantly higher baseline cost two years before treatment compared with the background population controls. These measures increased sharply during the year after treatment. Five years after treatment, healthcare costs and loss of productivity remained proportionally similarly increased for the two treatment groups compared to the background population. Multiple surgeries had detrimental effects on long term productivity for the patients, and spouses to patients had marginally increased loss of productivity. INTERPRETATION: The results show that patients referred to specialised treatment of LBP display poor socioeconomic prognosis, regardless of conservative or surgical treatment modality. This development was reinforced in patients undergoing multiple surgeries and was also observed among spouses to the patients. Our findings of substantial loss of productivity across subgroups indicate that measures of successful treatment need to be more nuanced. Elsevier 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8718977/ /pubmed/35005584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101247 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Solumsmoen, Stian
Poulsen, Gry
Kjellberg, Jakob
Melbye, Mads
Munch, Tina Nørgaard
The impact of specialised treatment of low back pain on health care costs and productivity in a nationwide cohort
title The impact of specialised treatment of low back pain on health care costs and productivity in a nationwide cohort
title_full The impact of specialised treatment of low back pain on health care costs and productivity in a nationwide cohort
title_fullStr The impact of specialised treatment of low back pain on health care costs and productivity in a nationwide cohort
title_full_unstemmed The impact of specialised treatment of low back pain on health care costs and productivity in a nationwide cohort
title_short The impact of specialised treatment of low back pain on health care costs and productivity in a nationwide cohort
title_sort impact of specialised treatment of low back pain on health care costs and productivity in a nationwide cohort
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8718977/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35005584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101247
work_keys_str_mv AT solumsmoenstian theimpactofspecialisedtreatmentoflowbackpainonhealthcarecostsandproductivityinanationwidecohort
AT poulsengry theimpactofspecialisedtreatmentoflowbackpainonhealthcarecostsandproductivityinanationwidecohort
AT kjellbergjakob theimpactofspecialisedtreatmentoflowbackpainonhealthcarecostsandproductivityinanationwidecohort
AT melbyemads theimpactofspecialisedtreatmentoflowbackpainonhealthcarecostsandproductivityinanationwidecohort
AT munchtinanørgaard theimpactofspecialisedtreatmentoflowbackpainonhealthcarecostsandproductivityinanationwidecohort
AT solumsmoenstian impactofspecialisedtreatmentoflowbackpainonhealthcarecostsandproductivityinanationwidecohort
AT poulsengry impactofspecialisedtreatmentoflowbackpainonhealthcarecostsandproductivityinanationwidecohort
AT kjellbergjakob impactofspecialisedtreatmentoflowbackpainonhealthcarecostsandproductivityinanationwidecohort
AT melbyemads impactofspecialisedtreatmentoflowbackpainonhealthcarecostsandproductivityinanationwidecohort
AT munchtinanørgaard impactofspecialisedtreatmentoflowbackpainonhealthcarecostsandproductivityinanationwidecohort