Cargando…

Triage and monitoring of COVID-19 patients in intensive care using unsupervised machine learning()

BACKGROUND: We designed an algorithm to assess COVID-19 patients severity and dynamic intubation needs and predict their length of stay using the breathing frequency (BF) and oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) signals. METHODS: We recorded the BF and SpO(2) signals for confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boussen, Salah, Cordier, Pierre-Yves, Malet, Arthur, Simeone, Pierre, Cataldi, Sophie, Vaisse, Camille, Roche, Xavier, Castelli, Alexandre, Assal, Mehdi, Pepin, Guillaume, Cot, Kevin, Denis, Jean-Baptiste, Morales, Timothée, Velly, Lionel, Bruder, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8719000/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34998220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105192
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: We designed an algorithm to assess COVID-19 patients severity and dynamic intubation needs and predict their length of stay using the breathing frequency (BF) and oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) signals. METHODS: We recorded the BF and SpO(2) signals for confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU of a teaching hospital during both the first and subsequent outbreaks of the pandemic in France. An unsupervised machine-learning algorithm (the Gaussian mixture model) was applied to the patients' data for clustering. The algorithm's robustness was ensured by comparing its results against actual intubation rates. We predicted intubation rates using the algorithm every hour, thus conducting a severity evaluation. We designed a S(24) severity score that represented the patient's severity over the previous 24 h; the validity of MS(24), the maximum S(24) score, was checked against rates of intubation risk and prolonged ICU stay. RESULTS: Our sample included 279 patients. . The unsupervised clustering had an accuracy rate of 87.8% for intubation recognition (AUC = 0.94, True Positive Rate 86.5%, true Negative Rate 90.9%). The S(24) score of intubated patients was significantly higher than that of non-intubated patients at 48 h before intubation. The MS(24) score allowed for the distinguishing between three severity levels with an increased risk of intubation: green (3.4%), orange (37%), and red (77%). A MS(24) score over 40 was highly predictive of an ICU stay greater than 5 days at an accuracy rate of 81.0% (AUC = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Our algorithm uses simple signals and seems to efficiently visualize the patients' respiratory situations, meaning that it has the potential to assist staffs' in decision-making. Additionally, real-time computation is easy to implement.