Cargando…

Do Patients and Relatives Have Different Dispositions When Challenging Healthcare Professionals About Patient Safety? Results Before and After an Educational Program

BACKGROUND: There is a universal interest in evaluating the new roles of patients to improve patient safety. However, relatively little is known about the contribution of family caregivers. The purposes of this study was to determine whether patients and relatives (P&Rs) have different dispositi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodrigo‐Rincon, Isabel, Irigoyen-Aristorena, Isabel, Tirapu-Leon, Belen, Zaballos-Barcala, Nicolás, Sarobe-Carricas, Maite, Antelo-Caamaño, May, Lobo-Palanco, Joaquín, Martin-Vizcaino, Marta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8719499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32209946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000703
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: There is a universal interest in evaluating the new roles of patients to improve patient safety. However, relatively little is known about the contribution of family caregivers. The purposes of this study was to determine whether patients and relatives (P&Rs) have different dispositions when challenging healthcare professionals about patient safety and to measure the influence of an educational program. METHODS: An interventional before-and-after design was used to determine the P&Rs’ basal level of willingness and the influence of a training program. One hundred thirty-six participants were recruited, 90 patients and 46 relatives, from the Day Hospital of a Tertiary Hospital in Spain, in 2018. The safe practices selected were as follows: patient identification, hand hygiene, blood or chemotherapy identification, and secondary effects of treatment. The educational materials comprised brochures and story-type videos. A questionnaire measured participants’ willingness to speak up before and after the training. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-six P&Rs (63% response rate) agreed to participate. The hypothesis that relatives are more willing to challenge healthcare professionals could not be proven. Their willingness to speak up depended on the type of safe practice both before and after training, ranging from 42% to 87%. The percentage of items that P&Rs were willing to challenge increased after the training among both the patients and the relatives, but statically significant differences were only seen among patients. CONCLUSIONS: After the training, participants’ willingness to challenge healthcare workers was high for all safe practices analyzed but hand hygiene. Patients and relatives had very similar willingness. After the training, participants felt confident with their knowledge about safe practices, thereby increasing their challenging attitude.