Cargando…

Force field analysis of driving and restraining factors affecting the evidence-based decision-making in health systems; comparing two approaches

BACKGROUND: All policies and decisions need evidence examined by scientific methods. Moving toward evidence-based decision-making (EBDM) as a change in organizations, especially health systems (HSs), is inevitable. This study was conducted to identify the factors affecting EBDM in HSs from two appro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shafaghat, Tahereh, Zarchi, Mohammad Kazem Rahimi, Nasab, Mohammad Hasan Imani, Kavosi, Zahra, Bahrami, Mahammad Amin, Bastani, Peivand
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8719555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071625
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1142_20
_version_ 1784624959452086272
author Shafaghat, Tahereh
Zarchi, Mohammad Kazem Rahimi
Nasab, Mohammad Hasan Imani
Kavosi, Zahra
Bahrami, Mahammad Amin
Bastani, Peivand
author_facet Shafaghat, Tahereh
Zarchi, Mohammad Kazem Rahimi
Nasab, Mohammad Hasan Imani
Kavosi, Zahra
Bahrami, Mahammad Amin
Bastani, Peivand
author_sort Shafaghat, Tahereh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: All policies and decisions need evidence examined by scientific methods. Moving toward evidence-based decision-making (EBDM) as a change in organizations, especially health systems (HSs), is inevitable. This study was conducted to identify the factors affecting EBDM in HSs from two approaches and to score them. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mixed-method study was carried out using the force field analysis regarding the change toward EBDM in HS in 2020. This study included six steps to identify and score the key driving forces (DFs) and restraining forces (RFs) to change toward the EBDM in HS: first, finding forces from literature; second, selecting key DFs and RFs through focus group discussion; third, scoring the first group of DFs and RFs by the experts through electronic forms; fourth, determining key DFs and RFs from the managers’ perspective using qualitative interviews; fifth, scoring the second group of DFs and RFs by the experts; and sixth, comparison between forces resulted from two approaches. RESULTS: According to the literature and experts’ opinions, “relevant, reliable, interpretable, and understandable evidence” and “interaction between researchers and decision-makers” were the strongest forces to change, and “lack of organizational commitment and support” and “lack of relevant/high-quality evidence” were the strongest forces against the change toward EBDM in HS. Further, based on managers’ perspective and scores by the experts, “suitable supervision and control” and “reforming the planning and decision-making system” were the strongest forces to change, and “inadequate knowledge of the managers and staff about the principles and contents of EBDM” and “issues beyond the authorities of managers” were the strongest forces against the change toward EBDM in HS. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings, HSs’ managers can focus to reduce RFs and promote DFs for implementing EBDM strategies, so they can provide better services by making more efficient decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8719555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87195552022-01-20 Force field analysis of driving and restraining factors affecting the evidence-based decision-making in health systems; comparing two approaches Shafaghat, Tahereh Zarchi, Mohammad Kazem Rahimi Nasab, Mohammad Hasan Imani Kavosi, Zahra Bahrami, Mahammad Amin Bastani, Peivand J Educ Health Promot Original Article BACKGROUND: All policies and decisions need evidence examined by scientific methods. Moving toward evidence-based decision-making (EBDM) as a change in organizations, especially health systems (HSs), is inevitable. This study was conducted to identify the factors affecting EBDM in HSs from two approaches and to score them. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mixed-method study was carried out using the force field analysis regarding the change toward EBDM in HS in 2020. This study included six steps to identify and score the key driving forces (DFs) and restraining forces (RFs) to change toward the EBDM in HS: first, finding forces from literature; second, selecting key DFs and RFs through focus group discussion; third, scoring the first group of DFs and RFs by the experts through electronic forms; fourth, determining key DFs and RFs from the managers’ perspective using qualitative interviews; fifth, scoring the second group of DFs and RFs by the experts; and sixth, comparison between forces resulted from two approaches. RESULTS: According to the literature and experts’ opinions, “relevant, reliable, interpretable, and understandable evidence” and “interaction between researchers and decision-makers” were the strongest forces to change, and “lack of organizational commitment and support” and “lack of relevant/high-quality evidence” were the strongest forces against the change toward EBDM in HS. Further, based on managers’ perspective and scores by the experts, “suitable supervision and control” and “reforming the planning and decision-making system” were the strongest forces to change, and “inadequate knowledge of the managers and staff about the principles and contents of EBDM” and “issues beyond the authorities of managers” were the strongest forces against the change toward EBDM in HS. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings, HSs’ managers can focus to reduce RFs and promote DFs for implementing EBDM strategies, so they can provide better services by making more efficient decisions. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8719555/ /pubmed/35071625 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1142_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Education and Health Promotion https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shafaghat, Tahereh
Zarchi, Mohammad Kazem Rahimi
Nasab, Mohammad Hasan Imani
Kavosi, Zahra
Bahrami, Mahammad Amin
Bastani, Peivand
Force field analysis of driving and restraining factors affecting the evidence-based decision-making in health systems; comparing two approaches
title Force field analysis of driving and restraining factors affecting the evidence-based decision-making in health systems; comparing two approaches
title_full Force field analysis of driving and restraining factors affecting the evidence-based decision-making in health systems; comparing two approaches
title_fullStr Force field analysis of driving and restraining factors affecting the evidence-based decision-making in health systems; comparing two approaches
title_full_unstemmed Force field analysis of driving and restraining factors affecting the evidence-based decision-making in health systems; comparing two approaches
title_short Force field analysis of driving and restraining factors affecting the evidence-based decision-making in health systems; comparing two approaches
title_sort force field analysis of driving and restraining factors affecting the evidence-based decision-making in health systems; comparing two approaches
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8719555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35071625
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1142_20
work_keys_str_mv AT shafaghattahereh forcefieldanalysisofdrivingandrestrainingfactorsaffectingtheevidencebaseddecisionmakinginhealthsystemscomparingtwoapproaches
AT zarchimohammadkazemrahimi forcefieldanalysisofdrivingandrestrainingfactorsaffectingtheevidencebaseddecisionmakinginhealthsystemscomparingtwoapproaches
AT nasabmohammadhasanimani forcefieldanalysisofdrivingandrestrainingfactorsaffectingtheevidencebaseddecisionmakinginhealthsystemscomparingtwoapproaches
AT kavosizahra forcefieldanalysisofdrivingandrestrainingfactorsaffectingtheevidencebaseddecisionmakinginhealthsystemscomparingtwoapproaches
AT bahramimahammadamin forcefieldanalysisofdrivingandrestrainingfactorsaffectingtheevidencebaseddecisionmakinginhealthsystemscomparingtwoapproaches
AT bastanipeivand forcefieldanalysisofdrivingandrestrainingfactorsaffectingtheevidencebaseddecisionmakinginhealthsystemscomparingtwoapproaches