Cargando…

Comparison of urine proteome among rat models by intraperitoneal injection with single bacteria and co-injection with two bacteria

PURPOSE: To explore and compare urine proteome changes among rat models by intraperitoneal injection with single bacteria and co-injection with two bacteria. METHOD: Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus are two common human pathogens. Three rat models were established: (i) the intraperitoneal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meng, Wenshu, Zhao, Chenyang, Gao, Youhe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8719777/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34972134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261488
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To explore and compare urine proteome changes among rat models by intraperitoneal injection with single bacteria and co-injection with two bacteria. METHOD: Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus are two common human pathogens. Three rat models were established: (i) the intraperitoneal co-injection of E. coli and S. aureus model (ES model), (ii) intraperitoneal injection of E. coli model (E model), and (iii) intraperitoneal injection of S. aureus model (S model). Urinary proteomes on days 0, 1 and 2 of the three models were analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). RESULTS: A total of 111, 34 and 94 differential proteins were identified in the ES model, E model and S model, respectively. Among them, some differential proteins were reported to be associated with bacterial infection. Approximately 47% differential proteins in the E model overlapped with ES model, and 37% differential proteins in the S model overlapped with ES model. Compared with the E model and S model, a total of 71 unique differential proteins were identified in the ES model. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that (1) the urine proteome could distinguish different bacterial intraperitoneal injections models and (2) the effects of co-injection with two bacteria on the urine proteome were not simple superposition of single injection.