Cargando…

The role of non–COVID-specific and COVID-specific factors in predicting a shift in willingness to vaccinate: A panel study

Although declines in intent to vaccinate had been identified in international surveys conducted between June and October 2020, including in the United States, some individuals in the United States who previously expressed reluctance said, in spring 2021, that they were willing to vaccinate. That cha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, Romer, Daniel, Jamieson, Patrick E., Winneg, Kenneth M., Pasek, Josh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8719857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34930844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2112266118
_version_ 1784625028988403712
author Jamieson, Kathleen Hall
Romer, Daniel
Jamieson, Patrick E.
Winneg, Kenneth M.
Pasek, Josh
author_facet Jamieson, Kathleen Hall
Romer, Daniel
Jamieson, Patrick E.
Winneg, Kenneth M.
Pasek, Josh
author_sort Jamieson, Kathleen Hall
collection PubMed
description Although declines in intent to vaccinate had been identified in international surveys conducted between June and October 2020, including in the United States, some individuals in the United States who previously expressed reluctance said, in spring 2021, that they were willing to vaccinate. That change raised the following questions: What factors predicted an increased willingness to inoculate against COVID-19? And, to what extent was the change driven by COVID-specific factors, such as personal worry about the disease and COVID-specific misinformation, and to what extent by background (non–COVID-specific) factors, such as trust in medical authorities, accurate/inaccurate information about vaccination, vaccination history, and patterns of media reliance? This panel study of more than 8,000 individuals found that trust in health authorities anchored acceptance of vaccination and that knowledge about vaccination, flu vaccination history, and patterns of media reliance played a more prominent role in shifting individuals from vaccination hesitance to acceptance than COVID-specific factors. COVID-specific conspiracy beliefs did play a role, although a lesser one. These findings underscore the need to reinforce trust in health experts, facilitate community engagement with them, and preemptively communicate the benefits and safety record of authorized vaccines. The findings suggest, as well, the need to identify and deploy messaging able to undercut health-related conspiracy beliefs when they begin circulating.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8719857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87198572022-01-21 The role of non–COVID-specific and COVID-specific factors in predicting a shift in willingness to vaccinate: A panel study Jamieson, Kathleen Hall Romer, Daniel Jamieson, Patrick E. Winneg, Kenneth M. Pasek, Josh Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Social Sciences Although declines in intent to vaccinate had been identified in international surveys conducted between June and October 2020, including in the United States, some individuals in the United States who previously expressed reluctance said, in spring 2021, that they were willing to vaccinate. That change raised the following questions: What factors predicted an increased willingness to inoculate against COVID-19? And, to what extent was the change driven by COVID-specific factors, such as personal worry about the disease and COVID-specific misinformation, and to what extent by background (non–COVID-specific) factors, such as trust in medical authorities, accurate/inaccurate information about vaccination, vaccination history, and patterns of media reliance? This panel study of more than 8,000 individuals found that trust in health authorities anchored acceptance of vaccination and that knowledge about vaccination, flu vaccination history, and patterns of media reliance played a more prominent role in shifting individuals from vaccination hesitance to acceptance than COVID-specific factors. COVID-specific conspiracy beliefs did play a role, although a lesser one. These findings underscore the need to reinforce trust in health experts, facilitate community engagement with them, and preemptively communicate the benefits and safety record of authorized vaccines. The findings suggest, as well, the need to identify and deploy messaging able to undercut health-related conspiracy beliefs when they begin circulating. National Academy of Sciences 2021-12-20 2021-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8719857/ /pubmed/34930844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2112266118 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Social Sciences
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall
Romer, Daniel
Jamieson, Patrick E.
Winneg, Kenneth M.
Pasek, Josh
The role of non–COVID-specific and COVID-specific factors in predicting a shift in willingness to vaccinate: A panel study
title The role of non–COVID-specific and COVID-specific factors in predicting a shift in willingness to vaccinate: A panel study
title_full The role of non–COVID-specific and COVID-specific factors in predicting a shift in willingness to vaccinate: A panel study
title_fullStr The role of non–COVID-specific and COVID-specific factors in predicting a shift in willingness to vaccinate: A panel study
title_full_unstemmed The role of non–COVID-specific and COVID-specific factors in predicting a shift in willingness to vaccinate: A panel study
title_short The role of non–COVID-specific and COVID-specific factors in predicting a shift in willingness to vaccinate: A panel study
title_sort role of non–covid-specific and covid-specific factors in predicting a shift in willingness to vaccinate: a panel study
topic Social Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8719857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34930844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2112266118
work_keys_str_mv AT jamiesonkathleenhall theroleofnoncovidspecificandcovidspecificfactorsinpredictingashiftinwillingnesstovaccinateapanelstudy
AT romerdaniel theroleofnoncovidspecificandcovidspecificfactorsinpredictingashiftinwillingnesstovaccinateapanelstudy
AT jamiesonpatricke theroleofnoncovidspecificandcovidspecificfactorsinpredictingashiftinwillingnesstovaccinateapanelstudy
AT winnegkennethm theroleofnoncovidspecificandcovidspecificfactorsinpredictingashiftinwillingnesstovaccinateapanelstudy
AT pasekjosh theroleofnoncovidspecificandcovidspecificfactorsinpredictingashiftinwillingnesstovaccinateapanelstudy
AT jamiesonkathleenhall roleofnoncovidspecificandcovidspecificfactorsinpredictingashiftinwillingnesstovaccinateapanelstudy
AT romerdaniel roleofnoncovidspecificandcovidspecificfactorsinpredictingashiftinwillingnesstovaccinateapanelstudy
AT jamiesonpatricke roleofnoncovidspecificandcovidspecificfactorsinpredictingashiftinwillingnesstovaccinateapanelstudy
AT winnegkennethm roleofnoncovidspecificandcovidspecificfactorsinpredictingashiftinwillingnesstovaccinateapanelstudy
AT pasekjosh roleofnoncovidspecificandcovidspecificfactorsinpredictingashiftinwillingnesstovaccinateapanelstudy