Cargando…
Operative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer
Background There is a recent rise in the incidence of esophageal carcinoma in India. Surgical resection with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiation is the current treatment modality of choice. Postoperative complications, especially pulmonary complications, affect many patients who undergo open esoph...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8719958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34984201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1730085 |
_version_ | 1784625048497160192 |
---|---|
author | Chowdappa, Ramachandra Dharanikota, Anvesh Arjunan, Ravi Althaf, Syed Premalata, Chennagiri S. Ranganath, Namrata |
author_facet | Chowdappa, Ramachandra Dharanikota, Anvesh Arjunan, Ravi Althaf, Syed Premalata, Chennagiri S. Ranganath, Namrata |
author_sort | Chowdappa, Ramachandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background There is a recent rise in the incidence of esophageal carcinoma in India. Surgical resection with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiation is the current treatment modality of choice. Postoperative complications, especially pulmonary complications, affect many patients who undergo open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) could reduce the pulmonary complications and reduce the postoperative stay. Methodology We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 114 patients with esophageal cancer in the department of surgical oncology at a tertiary cancer center in South India between January 2019 and March 2020. We included patients with resectable cancer of middle or lower third of the esophagus, and gastroesophageal junction tumors (Siewert I). MIE was performed in 27 patients and 78 patients underwent open esophagectomy (OE). The primary outcome measured was postoperative complications of Clavien–Dindo grade II or higher within 30 days. Other outcomes measured include overall mortality within 30 days, intraoperative complications, operative duration and the length of hospital stay. Results A postoperative complication rate of 18.5% was noted in the MIE group, compared with 41% in the OE group ( p = 0.034). Pulmonary complications were noted in 7.4% in the MIE group compared to 25.6% in the OE group ( p = 0.044). Postoperative mortality rates, intraoperative complications, and other nonpulmonary postoperative complications were almost similar with MIE as with open esophagectomy. Although the median operative time was more in the MIE group (260 minutes vs. 180 minutes; p < 0.0001), the median length of hospital stay was shorter in patients undergoing MIE (9 days vs. 12 days; p = 0.0001). Conclusions We found that MIE resulted in lower incidence of postoperative complications, especially pulmonary complications. Although, MIE was associated with prolonged operative duration, it resulted in shorter hospital stay. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8719958 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87199582022-01-03 Operative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer Chowdappa, Ramachandra Dharanikota, Anvesh Arjunan, Ravi Althaf, Syed Premalata, Chennagiri S. Ranganath, Namrata South Asian J Cancer Background There is a recent rise in the incidence of esophageal carcinoma in India. Surgical resection with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiation is the current treatment modality of choice. Postoperative complications, especially pulmonary complications, affect many patients who undergo open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) could reduce the pulmonary complications and reduce the postoperative stay. Methodology We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 114 patients with esophageal cancer in the department of surgical oncology at a tertiary cancer center in South India between January 2019 and March 2020. We included patients with resectable cancer of middle or lower third of the esophagus, and gastroesophageal junction tumors (Siewert I). MIE was performed in 27 patients and 78 patients underwent open esophagectomy (OE). The primary outcome measured was postoperative complications of Clavien–Dindo grade II or higher within 30 days. Other outcomes measured include overall mortality within 30 days, intraoperative complications, operative duration and the length of hospital stay. Results A postoperative complication rate of 18.5% was noted in the MIE group, compared with 41% in the OE group ( p = 0.034). Pulmonary complications were noted in 7.4% in the MIE group compared to 25.6% in the OE group ( p = 0.044). Postoperative mortality rates, intraoperative complications, and other nonpulmonary postoperative complications were almost similar with MIE as with open esophagectomy. Although the median operative time was more in the MIE group (260 minutes vs. 180 minutes; p < 0.0001), the median length of hospital stay was shorter in patients undergoing MIE (9 days vs. 12 days; p = 0.0001). Conclusions We found that MIE resulted in lower incidence of postoperative complications, especially pulmonary complications. Although, MIE was associated with prolonged operative duration, it resulted in shorter hospital stay. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd 2021-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8719958/ /pubmed/34984201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1730085 Text en MedIntel Services Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Chowdappa, Ramachandra Dharanikota, Anvesh Arjunan, Ravi Althaf, Syed Premalata, Chennagiri S. Ranganath, Namrata Operative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer |
title | Operative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer |
title_full | Operative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer |
title_fullStr | Operative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Operative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer |
title_short | Operative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer |
title_sort | operative outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8719958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34984201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1730085 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chowdapparamachandra operativeoutcomesofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyforresectableesophagealcancer AT dharanikotaanvesh operativeoutcomesofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyforresectableesophagealcancer AT arjunanravi operativeoutcomesofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyforresectableesophagealcancer AT althafsyed operativeoutcomesofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyforresectableesophagealcancer AT premalatachennagiris operativeoutcomesofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyforresectableesophagealcancer AT ranganathnamrata operativeoutcomesofminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyforresectableesophagealcancer |