Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red Duroc pig model

BACKGROUND: Fractional CO(2) laser plays an important role in scar management post split-thickness skin graft by loosening the graft contracture and restoring the smoothness of the surface. However, the optimal treatment protocol remains unknown. This study applied a dual-scan protocol to achieve bo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jie, Ng, Sally Kiu-Huen, Xi, Wenjing, Zhang, Zheng, Wang, Xiaodian, Li, Hua, Su, Weijie, Wang, Jingyan, Zhang, Yixin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8720306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkab048
_version_ 1784625110564470784
author Li, Jie
Ng, Sally Kiu-Huen
Xi, Wenjing
Zhang, Zheng
Wang, Xiaodian
Li, Hua
Su, Weijie
Wang, Jingyan
Zhang, Yixin
author_facet Li, Jie
Ng, Sally Kiu-Huen
Xi, Wenjing
Zhang, Zheng
Wang, Xiaodian
Li, Hua
Su, Weijie
Wang, Jingyan
Zhang, Yixin
author_sort Li, Jie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fractional CO(2) laser plays an important role in scar management post split-thickness skin graft by loosening the graft contracture and restoring the smoothness of the surface. However, the optimal treatment protocol remains unknown. This study applied a dual-scan protocol to achieve both releasing and ablation of contracted skin graft. We comprehensively describe this treatment method and compare the efficacy and safety between this dual-scan method and the conventional mono-scan mode. METHODS: A hypercontracted scar model after split-thickness skin grafting in red Duroc pigs was established. All scars meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into four groups: high fluence–low density (HF–LD), low fluence–high density (LF–HD), combined group and control group. The energy per unit area was similar in the HF–LD and LF–HD groups. Two laser interventions were performed at a 6-week interval. The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated by objective measures of scar area, release rate, elasticity, thickness and flatness, while the safety was evaluated based on adverse reactions and melanin index. Collagen structure was observed histologically. The animals were followed up for a maximum of 126 days after modeling. RESULTS: A total of 28 contracted scars were included, 7 in each group. At 18 weeks postoperatively, the HF–LD and the combined groups showed significantly increased scar release rate (p = 0.000) and elasticity (p = 0.036) and decreased type I/III collagen ratio (p = 0.002) compared with the control and LF–HD groups. In terms of flatness, the combined group was significantly better than the HF–LD group for elevations <1 mm (p = 0.019). No significant skin side effects, pigmentation or scar thickness changes were observed at 18 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-scan protocol could achieve superficial ablation and deep release of contracted split-thickness skin graft in a single treatment, with similar contraction release and texture improvement compared to a single deep scan. Its main advantage is to restore a smoother scar appearance. Adequate laser penetration was necessary for the release of contracted scars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8720306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87203062022-01-04 Efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red Duroc pig model Li, Jie Ng, Sally Kiu-Huen Xi, Wenjing Zhang, Zheng Wang, Xiaodian Li, Hua Su, Weijie Wang, Jingyan Zhang, Yixin Burns Trauma Research Article BACKGROUND: Fractional CO(2) laser plays an important role in scar management post split-thickness skin graft by loosening the graft contracture and restoring the smoothness of the surface. However, the optimal treatment protocol remains unknown. This study applied a dual-scan protocol to achieve both releasing and ablation of contracted skin graft. We comprehensively describe this treatment method and compare the efficacy and safety between this dual-scan method and the conventional mono-scan mode. METHODS: A hypercontracted scar model after split-thickness skin grafting in red Duroc pigs was established. All scars meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into four groups: high fluence–low density (HF–LD), low fluence–high density (LF–HD), combined group and control group. The energy per unit area was similar in the HF–LD and LF–HD groups. Two laser interventions were performed at a 6-week interval. The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated by objective measures of scar area, release rate, elasticity, thickness and flatness, while the safety was evaluated based on adverse reactions and melanin index. Collagen structure was observed histologically. The animals were followed up for a maximum of 126 days after modeling. RESULTS: A total of 28 contracted scars were included, 7 in each group. At 18 weeks postoperatively, the HF–LD and the combined groups showed significantly increased scar release rate (p = 0.000) and elasticity (p = 0.036) and decreased type I/III collagen ratio (p = 0.002) compared with the control and LF–HD groups. In terms of flatness, the combined group was significantly better than the HF–LD group for elevations <1 mm (p = 0.019). No significant skin side effects, pigmentation or scar thickness changes were observed at 18 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-scan protocol could achieve superficial ablation and deep release of contracted split-thickness skin graft in a single treatment, with similar contraction release and texture improvement compared to a single deep scan. Its main advantage is to restore a smoother scar appearance. Adequate laser penetration was necessary for the release of contracted scars. Oxford University Press 2021-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8720306/ /pubmed/34988232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkab048 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Jie
Ng, Sally Kiu-Huen
Xi, Wenjing
Zhang, Zheng
Wang, Xiaodian
Li, Hua
Su, Weijie
Wang, Jingyan
Zhang, Yixin
Efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red Duroc pig model
title Efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red Duroc pig model
title_full Efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red Duroc pig model
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red Duroc pig model
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red Duroc pig model
title_short Efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red Duroc pig model
title_sort efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red duroc pig model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8720306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkab048
work_keys_str_mv AT lijie efficacyandsafetyofadualscanprotocolforcarbondioxidelaserinthetreatmentofsplitthicknessskingraftcontractioninareddurocpigmodel
AT ngsallykiuhuen efficacyandsafetyofadualscanprotocolforcarbondioxidelaserinthetreatmentofsplitthicknessskingraftcontractioninareddurocpigmodel
AT xiwenjing efficacyandsafetyofadualscanprotocolforcarbondioxidelaserinthetreatmentofsplitthicknessskingraftcontractioninareddurocpigmodel
AT zhangzheng efficacyandsafetyofadualscanprotocolforcarbondioxidelaserinthetreatmentofsplitthicknessskingraftcontractioninareddurocpigmodel
AT wangxiaodian efficacyandsafetyofadualscanprotocolforcarbondioxidelaserinthetreatmentofsplitthicknessskingraftcontractioninareddurocpigmodel
AT lihua efficacyandsafetyofadualscanprotocolforcarbondioxidelaserinthetreatmentofsplitthicknessskingraftcontractioninareddurocpigmodel
AT suweijie efficacyandsafetyofadualscanprotocolforcarbondioxidelaserinthetreatmentofsplitthicknessskingraftcontractioninareddurocpigmodel
AT wangjingyan efficacyandsafetyofadualscanprotocolforcarbondioxidelaserinthetreatmentofsplitthicknessskingraftcontractioninareddurocpigmodel
AT zhangyixin efficacyandsafetyofadualscanprotocolforcarbondioxidelaserinthetreatmentofsplitthicknessskingraftcontractioninareddurocpigmodel