Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red Duroc pig model
BACKGROUND: Fractional CO(2) laser plays an important role in scar management post split-thickness skin graft by loosening the graft contracture and restoring the smoothness of the surface. However, the optimal treatment protocol remains unknown. This study applied a dual-scan protocol to achieve bo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8720306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkab048 |
_version_ | 1784625110564470784 |
---|---|
author | Li, Jie Ng, Sally Kiu-Huen Xi, Wenjing Zhang, Zheng Wang, Xiaodian Li, Hua Su, Weijie Wang, Jingyan Zhang, Yixin |
author_facet | Li, Jie Ng, Sally Kiu-Huen Xi, Wenjing Zhang, Zheng Wang, Xiaodian Li, Hua Su, Weijie Wang, Jingyan Zhang, Yixin |
author_sort | Li, Jie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fractional CO(2) laser plays an important role in scar management post split-thickness skin graft by loosening the graft contracture and restoring the smoothness of the surface. However, the optimal treatment protocol remains unknown. This study applied a dual-scan protocol to achieve both releasing and ablation of contracted skin graft. We comprehensively describe this treatment method and compare the efficacy and safety between this dual-scan method and the conventional mono-scan mode. METHODS: A hypercontracted scar model after split-thickness skin grafting in red Duroc pigs was established. All scars meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into four groups: high fluence–low density (HF–LD), low fluence–high density (LF–HD), combined group and control group. The energy per unit area was similar in the HF–LD and LF–HD groups. Two laser interventions were performed at a 6-week interval. The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated by objective measures of scar area, release rate, elasticity, thickness and flatness, while the safety was evaluated based on adverse reactions and melanin index. Collagen structure was observed histologically. The animals were followed up for a maximum of 126 days after modeling. RESULTS: A total of 28 contracted scars were included, 7 in each group. At 18 weeks postoperatively, the HF–LD and the combined groups showed significantly increased scar release rate (p = 0.000) and elasticity (p = 0.036) and decreased type I/III collagen ratio (p = 0.002) compared with the control and LF–HD groups. In terms of flatness, the combined group was significantly better than the HF–LD group for elevations <1 mm (p = 0.019). No significant skin side effects, pigmentation or scar thickness changes were observed at 18 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-scan protocol could achieve superficial ablation and deep release of contracted split-thickness skin graft in a single treatment, with similar contraction release and texture improvement compared to a single deep scan. Its main advantage is to restore a smoother scar appearance. Adequate laser penetration was necessary for the release of contracted scars. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8720306 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87203062022-01-04 Efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red Duroc pig model Li, Jie Ng, Sally Kiu-Huen Xi, Wenjing Zhang, Zheng Wang, Xiaodian Li, Hua Su, Weijie Wang, Jingyan Zhang, Yixin Burns Trauma Research Article BACKGROUND: Fractional CO(2) laser plays an important role in scar management post split-thickness skin graft by loosening the graft contracture and restoring the smoothness of the surface. However, the optimal treatment protocol remains unknown. This study applied a dual-scan protocol to achieve both releasing and ablation of contracted skin graft. We comprehensively describe this treatment method and compare the efficacy and safety between this dual-scan method and the conventional mono-scan mode. METHODS: A hypercontracted scar model after split-thickness skin grafting in red Duroc pigs was established. All scars meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into four groups: high fluence–low density (HF–LD), low fluence–high density (LF–HD), combined group and control group. The energy per unit area was similar in the HF–LD and LF–HD groups. Two laser interventions were performed at a 6-week interval. The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated by objective measures of scar area, release rate, elasticity, thickness and flatness, while the safety was evaluated based on adverse reactions and melanin index. Collagen structure was observed histologically. The animals were followed up for a maximum of 126 days after modeling. RESULTS: A total of 28 contracted scars were included, 7 in each group. At 18 weeks postoperatively, the HF–LD and the combined groups showed significantly increased scar release rate (p = 0.000) and elasticity (p = 0.036) and decreased type I/III collagen ratio (p = 0.002) compared with the control and LF–HD groups. In terms of flatness, the combined group was significantly better than the HF–LD group for elevations <1 mm (p = 0.019). No significant skin side effects, pigmentation or scar thickness changes were observed at 18 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Dual-scan protocol could achieve superficial ablation and deep release of contracted split-thickness skin graft in a single treatment, with similar contraction release and texture improvement compared to a single deep scan. Its main advantage is to restore a smoother scar appearance. Adequate laser penetration was necessary for the release of contracted scars. Oxford University Press 2021-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8720306/ /pubmed/34988232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkab048 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Jie Ng, Sally Kiu-Huen Xi, Wenjing Zhang, Zheng Wang, Xiaodian Li, Hua Su, Weijie Wang, Jingyan Zhang, Yixin Efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red Duroc pig model |
title | Efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red Duroc pig model |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red Duroc pig model |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red Duroc pig model |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red Duroc pig model |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red Duroc pig model |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of a dual-scan protocol for carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft contraction in a red duroc pig model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8720306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkab048 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lijie efficacyandsafetyofadualscanprotocolforcarbondioxidelaserinthetreatmentofsplitthicknessskingraftcontractioninareddurocpigmodel AT ngsallykiuhuen efficacyandsafetyofadualscanprotocolforcarbondioxidelaserinthetreatmentofsplitthicknessskingraftcontractioninareddurocpigmodel AT xiwenjing efficacyandsafetyofadualscanprotocolforcarbondioxidelaserinthetreatmentofsplitthicknessskingraftcontractioninareddurocpigmodel AT zhangzheng efficacyandsafetyofadualscanprotocolforcarbondioxidelaserinthetreatmentofsplitthicknessskingraftcontractioninareddurocpigmodel AT wangxiaodian efficacyandsafetyofadualscanprotocolforcarbondioxidelaserinthetreatmentofsplitthicknessskingraftcontractioninareddurocpigmodel AT lihua efficacyandsafetyofadualscanprotocolforcarbondioxidelaserinthetreatmentofsplitthicknessskingraftcontractioninareddurocpigmodel AT suweijie efficacyandsafetyofadualscanprotocolforcarbondioxidelaserinthetreatmentofsplitthicknessskingraftcontractioninareddurocpigmodel AT wangjingyan efficacyandsafetyofadualscanprotocolforcarbondioxidelaserinthetreatmentofsplitthicknessskingraftcontractioninareddurocpigmodel AT zhangyixin efficacyandsafetyofadualscanprotocolforcarbondioxidelaserinthetreatmentofsplitthicknessskingraftcontractioninareddurocpigmodel |