Cargando…

Does Location Uncertainty Modulate Unconscious Processing Under Continuous Flash Suppression?

Previous research suggests that selective spatial attention is a determining factor for unconscious processing under continuous flash suppression (CFS), and specifically, that inattention toward stimulus location facilitates its unconscious processing by reducing the depth of CFS (Eo et al., 2016)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benthien, Fenja Mareike, Hesselmann, Guido
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8720365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35003402
http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0312-3
_version_ 1784625113811910656
author Benthien, Fenja Mareike
Hesselmann, Guido
author_facet Benthien, Fenja Mareike
Hesselmann, Guido
author_sort Benthien, Fenja Mareike
collection PubMed
description Previous research suggests that selective spatial attention is a determining factor for unconscious processing under continuous flash suppression (CFS), and specifically, that inattention toward stimulus location facilitates its unconscious processing by reducing the depth of CFS (Eo et al., 2016). The aim of our study was to further examine this modulation-by-attention model of CFS using a number priming paradigm. Participants (N = 26) performed a number comparison task on a visible target number (“compare target to five”). Prime-target pairs were either congruent (both smaller or larger than five) or incongruent. Spatial attention toward the primes was varied by manipulating the uncertainty of the primes’ location. Based on the modulation-by-attention model, we hypothesized the following: In trials with uncertain prime location, RTs for congruent prime-target pairs should be faster than for incongruent ones. In trials with certain prime location, RTs for congruent versus incongruent prime-target pairs should not differ. We analyzed our data with sequential Bayes factors (BFs). Our data showed no effect of location uncertainty on unconscious priming under CFS (BF0+ = 5.16). However, even visible primes only weakly influenced RTs. Possible reasons for the absence of robust number priming effects in our study are discussed. Based on exploratory analyses, we conclude that the numerical order of prime and target resulted in a response conflict and interfered with the predicted priming effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8720365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87203652022-01-06 Does Location Uncertainty Modulate Unconscious Processing Under Continuous Flash Suppression? Benthien, Fenja Mareike Hesselmann, Guido Adv Cogn Psychol Research Articles Previous research suggests that selective spatial attention is a determining factor for unconscious processing under continuous flash suppression (CFS), and specifically, that inattention toward stimulus location facilitates its unconscious processing by reducing the depth of CFS (Eo et al., 2016). The aim of our study was to further examine this modulation-by-attention model of CFS using a number priming paradigm. Participants (N = 26) performed a number comparison task on a visible target number (“compare target to five”). Prime-target pairs were either congruent (both smaller or larger than five) or incongruent. Spatial attention toward the primes was varied by manipulating the uncertainty of the primes’ location. Based on the modulation-by-attention model, we hypothesized the following: In trials with uncertain prime location, RTs for congruent prime-target pairs should be faster than for incongruent ones. In trials with certain prime location, RTs for congruent versus incongruent prime-target pairs should not differ. We analyzed our data with sequential Bayes factors (BFs). Our data showed no effect of location uncertainty on unconscious priming under CFS (BF0+ = 5.16). However, even visible primes only weakly influenced RTs. Possible reasons for the absence of robust number priming effects in our study are discussed. Based on exploratory analyses, we conclude that the numerical order of prime and target resulted in a response conflict and interfered with the predicted priming effect. University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw 2021-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8720365/ /pubmed/35003402 http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0312-3 Text en Copyright: © 2021 University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Benthien, Fenja Mareike
Hesselmann, Guido
Does Location Uncertainty Modulate Unconscious Processing Under Continuous Flash Suppression?
title Does Location Uncertainty Modulate Unconscious Processing Under Continuous Flash Suppression?
title_full Does Location Uncertainty Modulate Unconscious Processing Under Continuous Flash Suppression?
title_fullStr Does Location Uncertainty Modulate Unconscious Processing Under Continuous Flash Suppression?
title_full_unstemmed Does Location Uncertainty Modulate Unconscious Processing Under Continuous Flash Suppression?
title_short Does Location Uncertainty Modulate Unconscious Processing Under Continuous Flash Suppression?
title_sort does location uncertainty modulate unconscious processing under continuous flash suppression?
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8720365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35003402
http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0312-3
work_keys_str_mv AT benthienfenjamareike doeslocationuncertaintymodulateunconsciousprocessingundercontinuousflashsuppression
AT hesselmannguido doeslocationuncertaintymodulateunconsciousprocessingundercontinuousflashsuppression