Cargando…
A Scale to Measure the Joy in Work of Doctors: Development, Validity, and Reliability
Background: The aim of this study is to develop a scale and evaluate its' validity and reliability to measure the joy in work of doctors. Methods: Based on literature review and panel discussion, the scale framework and item pool were determined. Next, the items were modified by two rounds of e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8720855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.760647 |
_version_ | 1784625213228449792 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Zemiao Hu, Yinhuan Chen, Hao Zhu, Weilin Li, Dehe Zhu, Ximin Wu, Xiaoyue Li, Jiayi |
author_facet | Zhang, Zemiao Hu, Yinhuan Chen, Hao Zhu, Weilin Li, Dehe Zhu, Ximin Wu, Xiaoyue Li, Jiayi |
author_sort | Zhang, Zemiao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The aim of this study is to develop a scale and evaluate its' validity and reliability to measure the joy in work of doctors. Methods: Based on literature review and panel discussion, the scale framework and item pool were determined. Next, the items were modified by two rounds of expert consultation. Then the pre-investigation was applied and the formal version of scale was formed. Last, the reliability and validity of the scale were tested with 426 physicians. Results: The scale was composed of four dimensions: work autonomy needs, competency identification needs, competency perception needs and work relationship needs. Each dimension had 7 items, and both reliability and validity were acceptable. The Cronbach α coefficient and half-reliability coefficient of the whole scale were 0.954 (>0.9) and 0.974 (>0.9). The Spearman correlations of item-total score ranged from 0.556 to 0.749, indicating a good-item total score correlation. The χ 2/ df, RMSEA, RMR, GFI, CFI, and TLI, CFA of the maximum likelihood method supported a good fit with the model. Conclusions: Based on the self-determination theory, this study develops a scale to measure the joy in work of doctors. It has good validation and reliability, which is useful for doctors and medical institutions to take steps to improve happiness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8720855 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87208552022-01-04 A Scale to Measure the Joy in Work of Doctors: Development, Validity, and Reliability Zhang, Zemiao Hu, Yinhuan Chen, Hao Zhu, Weilin Li, Dehe Zhu, Ximin Wu, Xiaoyue Li, Jiayi Front Public Health Public Health Background: The aim of this study is to develop a scale and evaluate its' validity and reliability to measure the joy in work of doctors. Methods: Based on literature review and panel discussion, the scale framework and item pool were determined. Next, the items were modified by two rounds of expert consultation. Then the pre-investigation was applied and the formal version of scale was formed. Last, the reliability and validity of the scale were tested with 426 physicians. Results: The scale was composed of four dimensions: work autonomy needs, competency identification needs, competency perception needs and work relationship needs. Each dimension had 7 items, and both reliability and validity were acceptable. The Cronbach α coefficient and half-reliability coefficient of the whole scale were 0.954 (>0.9) and 0.974 (>0.9). The Spearman correlations of item-total score ranged from 0.556 to 0.749, indicating a good-item total score correlation. The χ 2/ df, RMSEA, RMR, GFI, CFI, and TLI, CFA of the maximum likelihood method supported a good fit with the model. Conclusions: Based on the self-determination theory, this study develops a scale to measure the joy in work of doctors. It has good validation and reliability, which is useful for doctors and medical institutions to take steps to improve happiness. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8720855/ /pubmed/34988047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.760647 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Hu, Chen, Zhu, Li, Zhu, Wu and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Zhang, Zemiao Hu, Yinhuan Chen, Hao Zhu, Weilin Li, Dehe Zhu, Ximin Wu, Xiaoyue Li, Jiayi A Scale to Measure the Joy in Work of Doctors: Development, Validity, and Reliability |
title | A Scale to Measure the Joy in Work of Doctors: Development, Validity, and Reliability |
title_full | A Scale to Measure the Joy in Work of Doctors: Development, Validity, and Reliability |
title_fullStr | A Scale to Measure the Joy in Work of Doctors: Development, Validity, and Reliability |
title_full_unstemmed | A Scale to Measure the Joy in Work of Doctors: Development, Validity, and Reliability |
title_short | A Scale to Measure the Joy in Work of Doctors: Development, Validity, and Reliability |
title_sort | scale to measure the joy in work of doctors: development, validity, and reliability |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8720855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.760647 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangzemiao ascaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability AT huyinhuan ascaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability AT chenhao ascaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability AT zhuweilin ascaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability AT lidehe ascaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability AT zhuximin ascaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability AT wuxiaoyue ascaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability AT lijiayi ascaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability AT zhangzemiao scaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability AT huyinhuan scaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability AT chenhao scaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability AT zhuweilin scaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability AT lidehe scaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability AT zhuximin scaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability AT wuxiaoyue scaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability AT lijiayi scaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability |