Cargando…

A Scale to Measure the Joy in Work of Doctors: Development, Validity, and Reliability

Background: The aim of this study is to develop a scale and evaluate its' validity and reliability to measure the joy in work of doctors. Methods: Based on literature review and panel discussion, the scale framework and item pool were determined. Next, the items were modified by two rounds of e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Zemiao, Hu, Yinhuan, Chen, Hao, Zhu, Weilin, Li, Dehe, Zhu, Ximin, Wu, Xiaoyue, Li, Jiayi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8720855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988047
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.760647
_version_ 1784625213228449792
author Zhang, Zemiao
Hu, Yinhuan
Chen, Hao
Zhu, Weilin
Li, Dehe
Zhu, Ximin
Wu, Xiaoyue
Li, Jiayi
author_facet Zhang, Zemiao
Hu, Yinhuan
Chen, Hao
Zhu, Weilin
Li, Dehe
Zhu, Ximin
Wu, Xiaoyue
Li, Jiayi
author_sort Zhang, Zemiao
collection PubMed
description Background: The aim of this study is to develop a scale and evaluate its' validity and reliability to measure the joy in work of doctors. Methods: Based on literature review and panel discussion, the scale framework and item pool were determined. Next, the items were modified by two rounds of expert consultation. Then the pre-investigation was applied and the formal version of scale was formed. Last, the reliability and validity of the scale were tested with 426 physicians. Results: The scale was composed of four dimensions: work autonomy needs, competency identification needs, competency perception needs and work relationship needs. Each dimension had 7 items, and both reliability and validity were acceptable. The Cronbach α coefficient and half-reliability coefficient of the whole scale were 0.954 (>0.9) and 0.974 (>0.9). The Spearman correlations of item-total score ranged from 0.556 to 0.749, indicating a good-item total score correlation. The χ 2/ df, RMSEA, RMR, GFI, CFI, and TLI, CFA of the maximum likelihood method supported a good fit with the model. Conclusions: Based on the self-determination theory, this study develops a scale to measure the joy in work of doctors. It has good validation and reliability, which is useful for doctors and medical institutions to take steps to improve happiness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8720855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87208552022-01-04 A Scale to Measure the Joy in Work of Doctors: Development, Validity, and Reliability Zhang, Zemiao Hu, Yinhuan Chen, Hao Zhu, Weilin Li, Dehe Zhu, Ximin Wu, Xiaoyue Li, Jiayi Front Public Health Public Health Background: The aim of this study is to develop a scale and evaluate its' validity and reliability to measure the joy in work of doctors. Methods: Based on literature review and panel discussion, the scale framework and item pool were determined. Next, the items were modified by two rounds of expert consultation. Then the pre-investigation was applied and the formal version of scale was formed. Last, the reliability and validity of the scale were tested with 426 physicians. Results: The scale was composed of four dimensions: work autonomy needs, competency identification needs, competency perception needs and work relationship needs. Each dimension had 7 items, and both reliability and validity were acceptable. The Cronbach α coefficient and half-reliability coefficient of the whole scale were 0.954 (>0.9) and 0.974 (>0.9). The Spearman correlations of item-total score ranged from 0.556 to 0.749, indicating a good-item total score correlation. The χ 2/ df, RMSEA, RMR, GFI, CFI, and TLI, CFA of the maximum likelihood method supported a good fit with the model. Conclusions: Based on the self-determination theory, this study develops a scale to measure the joy in work of doctors. It has good validation and reliability, which is useful for doctors and medical institutions to take steps to improve happiness. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8720855/ /pubmed/34988047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.760647 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Hu, Chen, Zhu, Li, Zhu, Wu and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Zhang, Zemiao
Hu, Yinhuan
Chen, Hao
Zhu, Weilin
Li, Dehe
Zhu, Ximin
Wu, Xiaoyue
Li, Jiayi
A Scale to Measure the Joy in Work of Doctors: Development, Validity, and Reliability
title A Scale to Measure the Joy in Work of Doctors: Development, Validity, and Reliability
title_full A Scale to Measure the Joy in Work of Doctors: Development, Validity, and Reliability
title_fullStr A Scale to Measure the Joy in Work of Doctors: Development, Validity, and Reliability
title_full_unstemmed A Scale to Measure the Joy in Work of Doctors: Development, Validity, and Reliability
title_short A Scale to Measure the Joy in Work of Doctors: Development, Validity, and Reliability
title_sort scale to measure the joy in work of doctors: development, validity, and reliability
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8720855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988047
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.760647
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangzemiao ascaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability
AT huyinhuan ascaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability
AT chenhao ascaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability
AT zhuweilin ascaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability
AT lidehe ascaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability
AT zhuximin ascaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability
AT wuxiaoyue ascaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability
AT lijiayi ascaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability
AT zhangzemiao scaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability
AT huyinhuan scaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability
AT chenhao scaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability
AT zhuweilin scaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability
AT lidehe scaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability
AT zhuximin scaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability
AT wuxiaoyue scaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability
AT lijiayi scaletomeasurethejoyinworkofdoctorsdevelopmentvalidityandreliability