Cargando…

Intrinsic Tendon Regeneration After Application of Purified Exosome Product: An In Vivo Study

BACKGROUND: Tendons are primarily acellular, limiting their intrinsic regenerative capabilities. This limited regenerative potential contributes to delayed healing, rupture, and adhesion formation after tendon injury. PURPOSE: To determine if a tendon’s intrinsic regenerative potential could be impr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wellings, Elizabeth P., Huang, Tony Chieh-Ting, Li, Jialun, Peterson, Timothy E., Hooke, Alexander W., Rosenbaum, Andrew, Zhao, Chunfeng D., Behfar, Atta, Moran, Steven L., Houdek, Matthew T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8721391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671211062929
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Tendons are primarily acellular, limiting their intrinsic regenerative capabilities. This limited regenerative potential contributes to delayed healing, rupture, and adhesion formation after tendon injury. PURPOSE: To determine if a tendon’s intrinsic regenerative potential could be improved after the application of a purified exosome product (PEP) when loaded onto a collagen scaffold. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: An in vivo rabbit Achilles tendon model was used and consisted of 3 groups: (1) Achilles tenotomy with suture repair, (2) Achilles tenotomy with suture repair and collagen scaffold, and (3) Achilles tenotomy with suture repair and collagen scaffold loaded with PEP at 1 × 10(12) exosomes/mL. Each group consisted of 15 rabbits for a total of 45 specimens. Mechanical and histologic analyses were performed at both 3 and 6 weeks. RESULTS: The load to failure and ultimate tensile stress were found to be similar across all groups (P ≥ .15). The tendon cross-sectional area was significantly smaller for tendons treated with PEP compared with the control groups at 6 weeks, which was primarily related to an absence of external adhesions (P = .04). Histologic analysis confirmed these findings, demonstrating significantly lower adhesion grade both macroscopically (P = .0006) and microscopically (P = .0062) when tendons were treated with PEP. Immunohistochemical staining showed a greater intensity for type 1 collagen for PEP-treated tendons compared with collagen-only or control tendons. CONCLUSION: Mechanical and histologic results suggested that healing in the PEP-treated group favored intrinsic healing (absence of adhesions) while control animals and animals treated with collagen only healed primarily via extrinsic scar formation. Despite a smaller cross-sectional area, treated tendons had the same ultimate tensile stress. This pilot investigation shows promise for PEP as a means of effectively treating tendon injuries and enhancing intrinsic healing. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The production of a cell-free, off-the-shelf product that can promote tendon regeneration would provide a viable solution for physicians and patients to enhance tendon healing and decrease adhesions as well as shorten the time required to return to work or sports.