Cargando…

Evaluation of plan robustness on the dosimetry of volumetric arc radiotherapy (VMAT) with set-up uncertainty in Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the sensitivity to set up the uncertainty of VMAT plans in Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treatment by proposing a plan robustness evaluation method. METHODS: 10 patients were selected for this study. A 2-arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan was generated for each pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Zhen, Xiang, Xiaoyong, Zeng, Qi, Ma, Jun, Dai, Zhitao, Kang, Kailian, Bi, Suyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8722041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34980178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01970-8
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To evaluate the sensitivity to set up the uncertainty of VMAT plans in Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treatment by proposing a plan robustness evaluation method. METHODS: 10 patients were selected for this study. A 2-arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan was generated for each patient using Varian Eclipse (13.6 Version) treatment planning system (TPS). 5 uncertainty plans (U-plans) were recalculated based on the first 5 times set-up errors acquired from cone-beam computer tomography (CBCT). The dose differences of the original plan and perturbed plan corresponded to the plan robustness for the structure. Tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissues complication probability (NTCP) were calculated for biological evaluation. RESULTS: The mean dose differences of D(98%) and D(95%) (ΔD(98%) and ΔD(95%)) of PTVp were respectively 3.30 Gy and 2.02 Gy. The ΔD(98%) and ΔD(95%) of CTVp were 1.12 Gy and 0.58 Gy. The ΔD(98%) and ΔD(95%) of CTVn were 1.39 Gy and 1.03 Gy, distinctively lower than those in PTVn (2.8 Gy and 2.0 Gy). The CTV-to-PTV margin increased the robustness of CTVs. The ΔD(98%) and ΔD(95%) of GTVp were 0.56 Gy and 0.33 Gy. GTVn exhibited strong robustness with little variation of D(98%) (0.64 Gy) and D(95%) (0.39 Gy). No marked mean dose variations of D(mean) were seen. The mean reduction of TCP (ΔTCP) in GTVp and CTVp were respectively 0.4% and 0.3%. The mean ΔTCPs of GTVn and CTVn were 0.92% and 1.3% respectively. The CTV exhibited the largest ΔTCP (2.2%). In OARs, the brain stem exhibited weak robustness due to their locations in the vicinity of PTV. Bilateral parotid glands were sensitive to set-up uncertainty with a mean reduction of NTCP (ΔNTCP) of 6.17% (left) and 7.70% (right). The D(max) of optical nerves and lens varied slightly. CONCLUSION: VMAT plans had a strong sensitivity to set-up uncertainty in NPC radiotherapy, with increasing risk of underdose of tumor and overdose of vicinal OARs. We proposed an effective method to evaluate the plan robustness of VMAT plans. Plan robustness and complexity should be taken into account in photon radiotherapy.