Cargando…

Validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an important problem for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, current approaches to ILD case finding in real-world data have been evaluated only in limited settings and identify only prevalent ILD and not new-onset disease. Our obje...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meehan, M., Shah, A., Lobo, J., Oates, J., Clinton, C., Annapureddy, N., Xie, F., Zhuo, J., Danila, M. I., England, B. R., Curtis, J. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8722182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34980225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02655-z
_version_ 1784625479881326592
author Meehan, M.
Shah, A.
Lobo, J.
Oates, J.
Clinton, C.
Annapureddy, N.
Xie, F.
Zhuo, J.
Danila, M. I.
England, B. R.
Curtis, J. R.
author_facet Meehan, M.
Shah, A.
Lobo, J.
Oates, J.
Clinton, C.
Annapureddy, N.
Xie, F.
Zhuo, J.
Danila, M. I.
England, B. R.
Curtis, J. R.
author_sort Meehan, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an important problem for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, current approaches to ILD case finding in real-world data have been evaluated only in limited settings and identify only prevalent ILD and not new-onset disease. Our objective was to develop, refine, and validate a claims-based algorithm to identify both prevalent and incident ILD in RA patients compared to the gold standard of medical record review. METHODS: We used administrative claims data 2006–2015 from Medicare to derive a cohort of RA patients. We then identified suspected ILD using variations of ILD algorithms to classify both prevalent and incident ILD based on features of the data that included hospitalization vs. outpatient setting, physician specialty, pulmonary-related diagnosis codes, and exclusions for potentially mimicking pulmonary conditions. Positive predictive values (PPV) of several ILD algorithm variants for both prevalent and incident ILD were evaluated. RESULTS: We identified 234 linkable RA patients with sufficient data to evaluate for ILD. Overall, 108 (46.2%) of suspected cases were confirmed as ILD. Most cases (64%) were diagnosed in the outpatient setting. The best performing algorithm for prevalent ILD had a PPV of 77% (95% CI 67–84%) and for incident ILD was 96% (95% CI 85–100%). CONCLUSION: Case finding in administrative data for both prevalent and incident interstitial lung disease in RA patients is feasible and has reasonable accuracy to support population-based research and real-world evidence generation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-021-02655-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8722182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87221822022-01-06 Validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Meehan, M. Shah, A. Lobo, J. Oates, J. Clinton, C. Annapureddy, N. Xie, F. Zhuo, J. Danila, M. I. England, B. R. Curtis, J. R. Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an important problem for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, current approaches to ILD case finding in real-world data have been evaluated only in limited settings and identify only prevalent ILD and not new-onset disease. Our objective was to develop, refine, and validate a claims-based algorithm to identify both prevalent and incident ILD in RA patients compared to the gold standard of medical record review. METHODS: We used administrative claims data 2006–2015 from Medicare to derive a cohort of RA patients. We then identified suspected ILD using variations of ILD algorithms to classify both prevalent and incident ILD based on features of the data that included hospitalization vs. outpatient setting, physician specialty, pulmonary-related diagnosis codes, and exclusions for potentially mimicking pulmonary conditions. Positive predictive values (PPV) of several ILD algorithm variants for both prevalent and incident ILD were evaluated. RESULTS: We identified 234 linkable RA patients with sufficient data to evaluate for ILD. Overall, 108 (46.2%) of suspected cases were confirmed as ILD. Most cases (64%) were diagnosed in the outpatient setting. The best performing algorithm for prevalent ILD had a PPV of 77% (95% CI 67–84%) and for incident ILD was 96% (95% CI 85–100%). CONCLUSION: Case finding in administrative data for both prevalent and incident interstitial lung disease in RA patients is feasible and has reasonable accuracy to support population-based research and real-world evidence generation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-021-02655-z. BioMed Central 2022-01-03 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8722182/ /pubmed/34980225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02655-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Meehan, M.
Shah, A.
Lobo, J.
Oates, J.
Clinton, C.
Annapureddy, N.
Xie, F.
Zhuo, J.
Danila, M. I.
England, B. R.
Curtis, J. R.
Validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title Validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_full Validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_fullStr Validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_short Validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_sort validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8722182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34980225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02655-z
work_keys_str_mv AT meehanm validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT shaha validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT loboj validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT oatesj validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT clintonc validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT annapureddyn validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT xief validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT zhuoj validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT danilami validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT englandbr validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT curtisjr validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis