Cargando…
Validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an important problem for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, current approaches to ILD case finding in real-world data have been evaluated only in limited settings and identify only prevalent ILD and not new-onset disease. Our obje...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8722182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34980225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02655-z |
_version_ | 1784625479881326592 |
---|---|
author | Meehan, M. Shah, A. Lobo, J. Oates, J. Clinton, C. Annapureddy, N. Xie, F. Zhuo, J. Danila, M. I. England, B. R. Curtis, J. R. |
author_facet | Meehan, M. Shah, A. Lobo, J. Oates, J. Clinton, C. Annapureddy, N. Xie, F. Zhuo, J. Danila, M. I. England, B. R. Curtis, J. R. |
author_sort | Meehan, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an important problem for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, current approaches to ILD case finding in real-world data have been evaluated only in limited settings and identify only prevalent ILD and not new-onset disease. Our objective was to develop, refine, and validate a claims-based algorithm to identify both prevalent and incident ILD in RA patients compared to the gold standard of medical record review. METHODS: We used administrative claims data 2006–2015 from Medicare to derive a cohort of RA patients. We then identified suspected ILD using variations of ILD algorithms to classify both prevalent and incident ILD based on features of the data that included hospitalization vs. outpatient setting, physician specialty, pulmonary-related diagnosis codes, and exclusions for potentially mimicking pulmonary conditions. Positive predictive values (PPV) of several ILD algorithm variants for both prevalent and incident ILD were evaluated. RESULTS: We identified 234 linkable RA patients with sufficient data to evaluate for ILD. Overall, 108 (46.2%) of suspected cases were confirmed as ILD. Most cases (64%) were diagnosed in the outpatient setting. The best performing algorithm for prevalent ILD had a PPV of 77% (95% CI 67–84%) and for incident ILD was 96% (95% CI 85–100%). CONCLUSION: Case finding in administrative data for both prevalent and incident interstitial lung disease in RA patients is feasible and has reasonable accuracy to support population-based research and real-world evidence generation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-021-02655-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8722182 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87221822022-01-06 Validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Meehan, M. Shah, A. Lobo, J. Oates, J. Clinton, C. Annapureddy, N. Xie, F. Zhuo, J. Danila, M. I. England, B. R. Curtis, J. R. Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an important problem for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, current approaches to ILD case finding in real-world data have been evaluated only in limited settings and identify only prevalent ILD and not new-onset disease. Our objective was to develop, refine, and validate a claims-based algorithm to identify both prevalent and incident ILD in RA patients compared to the gold standard of medical record review. METHODS: We used administrative claims data 2006–2015 from Medicare to derive a cohort of RA patients. We then identified suspected ILD using variations of ILD algorithms to classify both prevalent and incident ILD based on features of the data that included hospitalization vs. outpatient setting, physician specialty, pulmonary-related diagnosis codes, and exclusions for potentially mimicking pulmonary conditions. Positive predictive values (PPV) of several ILD algorithm variants for both prevalent and incident ILD were evaluated. RESULTS: We identified 234 linkable RA patients with sufficient data to evaluate for ILD. Overall, 108 (46.2%) of suspected cases were confirmed as ILD. Most cases (64%) were diagnosed in the outpatient setting. The best performing algorithm for prevalent ILD had a PPV of 77% (95% CI 67–84%) and for incident ILD was 96% (95% CI 85–100%). CONCLUSION: Case finding in administrative data for both prevalent and incident interstitial lung disease in RA patients is feasible and has reasonable accuracy to support population-based research and real-world evidence generation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-021-02655-z. BioMed Central 2022-01-03 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8722182/ /pubmed/34980225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02655-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Meehan, M. Shah, A. Lobo, J. Oates, J. Clinton, C. Annapureddy, N. Xie, F. Zhuo, J. Danila, M. I. England, B. R. Curtis, J. R. Validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title | Validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_full | Validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_fullStr | Validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_short | Validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
title_sort | validation of an algorithm to identify incident interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8722182/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34980225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-021-02655-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meehanm validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT shaha validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT loboj validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT oatesj validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT clintonc validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT annapureddyn validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT xief validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT zhuoj validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT danilami validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT englandbr validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis AT curtisjr validationofanalgorithmtoidentifyincidentinterstitiallungdiseaseinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis |