Cargando…

PET/MR in recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with regorafenib: [(18)F]FET and DWI-ADC for response assessment and survival prediction

OBJECTIVE: The use of regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma patients has been recently approved by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) and added to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 2020 guidelines as a preferred regimen. Given its complex effects at the molecular level, the most appr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lombardi, Giuseppe, Spimpolo, Alessandro, Berti, Sara, Campi, Cristina, Anglani, Maria Giulia, Simeone, Rossella, Evangelista, Laura, Causin, Francesco, Zorzi, Giovanni, Gorgoni, Giancarlo, Caccese, Mario, Padovan, Marta, Zagonel, Vittorina, Cecchin, Diego
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8722234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34762492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211018
_version_ 1784625490621890560
author Lombardi, Giuseppe
Spimpolo, Alessandro
Berti, Sara
Campi, Cristina
Anglani, Maria Giulia
Simeone, Rossella
Evangelista, Laura
Causin, Francesco
Zorzi, Giovanni
Gorgoni, Giancarlo
Caccese, Mario
Padovan, Marta
Zagonel, Vittorina
Cecchin, Diego
author_facet Lombardi, Giuseppe
Spimpolo, Alessandro
Berti, Sara
Campi, Cristina
Anglani, Maria Giulia
Simeone, Rossella
Evangelista, Laura
Causin, Francesco
Zorzi, Giovanni
Gorgoni, Giancarlo
Caccese, Mario
Padovan, Marta
Zagonel, Vittorina
Cecchin, Diego
author_sort Lombardi, Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The use of regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma patients has been recently approved by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) and added to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 2020 guidelines as a preferred regimen. Given its complex effects at the molecular level, the most appropriate imaging tools to assess early response to treatment is still a matter of debate. Diffusion-weighted imaging and O-(2-(18)F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography ([(18)F]FET PET) are promising methodologies providing additional information to the currently used RANO criteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate the variations in diffusion-weighted imaging/apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and [(18)F]FET PET-derived parameters in patients who underwent PET/MR at both baseline and after starting regorafenib. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 16 consecutive GBM patients who underwent [(18)F]FET PET/MR before and after two cycles of regorafenib. Patients were sorted into stable (SD) or progressive disease (PD) categories in accordance with RANO criteria. We were also able to analyze four SD patients who underwent a third PET/MR after another four cycles of regorafenib. [(18)F]FET uptake greater than 1.6 times the mean background activity was used to define an area to be superimposed on an ADC map at baseline and after treatment. Several metrics were then derived and compared. Log-rank test was applied for overall survival analysis. RESULTS: Percentage difference in FET volumes correlates with the corresponding percentage difference in ADC (R = 0.54). Patients with a twofold increase in FET after regorafenib showed a significantly higher increase in ADC pathological volume than the remaining subjects (p = 0.0023). Kaplan–Meier analysis, performed to compare the performance in overall survival prediction, revealed that the percentage variations of FET- and ADC-derived metrics performed at least as well as RANO criteria (p = 0.02, p = 0.024 and p = 0.04 respectively) and in some cases even better. TBR Max and TBR mean are not able to accurately predict overall survival. CONCLUSION: In recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with regorafenib, [(18)F]FET and ADC metrics, are able to predict overall survival and being obtained from completely different measures as compared to RANO, could serve as semi-quantitative independent biomarkers of response to treatment. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Simultaneous evaluation of [(18)F]FET and ADC metrics using PET/MR allows an early and reliable identification of response to treatment and predict overall survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8722234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87222342022-01-11 PET/MR in recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with regorafenib: [(18)F]FET and DWI-ADC for response assessment and survival prediction Lombardi, Giuseppe Spimpolo, Alessandro Berti, Sara Campi, Cristina Anglani, Maria Giulia Simeone, Rossella Evangelista, Laura Causin, Francesco Zorzi, Giovanni Gorgoni, Giancarlo Caccese, Mario Padovan, Marta Zagonel, Vittorina Cecchin, Diego Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVE: The use of regorafenib in recurrent glioblastoma patients has been recently approved by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) and added to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 2020 guidelines as a preferred regimen. Given its complex effects at the molecular level, the most appropriate imaging tools to assess early response to treatment is still a matter of debate. Diffusion-weighted imaging and O-(2-(18)F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography ([(18)F]FET PET) are promising methodologies providing additional information to the currently used RANO criteria. The aim of this study was to evaluate the variations in diffusion-weighted imaging/apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and [(18)F]FET PET-derived parameters in patients who underwent PET/MR at both baseline and after starting regorafenib. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 16 consecutive GBM patients who underwent [(18)F]FET PET/MR before and after two cycles of regorafenib. Patients were sorted into stable (SD) or progressive disease (PD) categories in accordance with RANO criteria. We were also able to analyze four SD patients who underwent a third PET/MR after another four cycles of regorafenib. [(18)F]FET uptake greater than 1.6 times the mean background activity was used to define an area to be superimposed on an ADC map at baseline and after treatment. Several metrics were then derived and compared. Log-rank test was applied for overall survival analysis. RESULTS: Percentage difference in FET volumes correlates with the corresponding percentage difference in ADC (R = 0.54). Patients with a twofold increase in FET after regorafenib showed a significantly higher increase in ADC pathological volume than the remaining subjects (p = 0.0023). Kaplan–Meier analysis, performed to compare the performance in overall survival prediction, revealed that the percentage variations of FET- and ADC-derived metrics performed at least as well as RANO criteria (p = 0.02, p = 0.024 and p = 0.04 respectively) and in some cases even better. TBR Max and TBR mean are not able to accurately predict overall survival. CONCLUSION: In recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with regorafenib, [(18)F]FET and ADC metrics, are able to predict overall survival and being obtained from completely different measures as compared to RANO, could serve as semi-quantitative independent biomarkers of response to treatment. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Simultaneous evaluation of [(18)F]FET and ADC metrics using PET/MR allows an early and reliable identification of response to treatment and predict overall survival. The British Institute of Radiology. 2022-01-01 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8722234/ /pubmed/34762492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211018 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Lombardi, Giuseppe
Spimpolo, Alessandro
Berti, Sara
Campi, Cristina
Anglani, Maria Giulia
Simeone, Rossella
Evangelista, Laura
Causin, Francesco
Zorzi, Giovanni
Gorgoni, Giancarlo
Caccese, Mario
Padovan, Marta
Zagonel, Vittorina
Cecchin, Diego
PET/MR in recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with regorafenib: [(18)F]FET and DWI-ADC for response assessment and survival prediction
title PET/MR in recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with regorafenib: [(18)F]FET and DWI-ADC for response assessment and survival prediction
title_full PET/MR in recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with regorafenib: [(18)F]FET and DWI-ADC for response assessment and survival prediction
title_fullStr PET/MR in recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with regorafenib: [(18)F]FET and DWI-ADC for response assessment and survival prediction
title_full_unstemmed PET/MR in recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with regorafenib: [(18)F]FET and DWI-ADC for response assessment and survival prediction
title_short PET/MR in recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with regorafenib: [(18)F]FET and DWI-ADC for response assessment and survival prediction
title_sort pet/mr in recurrent glioblastoma patients treated with regorafenib: [(18)f]fet and dwi-adc for response assessment and survival prediction
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8722234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34762492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211018
work_keys_str_mv AT lombardigiuseppe petmrinrecurrentglioblastomapatientstreatedwithregorafenib18ffetanddwiadcforresponseassessmentandsurvivalprediction
AT spimpoloalessandro petmrinrecurrentglioblastomapatientstreatedwithregorafenib18ffetanddwiadcforresponseassessmentandsurvivalprediction
AT bertisara petmrinrecurrentglioblastomapatientstreatedwithregorafenib18ffetanddwiadcforresponseassessmentandsurvivalprediction
AT campicristina petmrinrecurrentglioblastomapatientstreatedwithregorafenib18ffetanddwiadcforresponseassessmentandsurvivalprediction
AT anglanimariagiulia petmrinrecurrentglioblastomapatientstreatedwithregorafenib18ffetanddwiadcforresponseassessmentandsurvivalprediction
AT simeonerossella petmrinrecurrentglioblastomapatientstreatedwithregorafenib18ffetanddwiadcforresponseassessmentandsurvivalprediction
AT evangelistalaura petmrinrecurrentglioblastomapatientstreatedwithregorafenib18ffetanddwiadcforresponseassessmentandsurvivalprediction
AT causinfrancesco petmrinrecurrentglioblastomapatientstreatedwithregorafenib18ffetanddwiadcforresponseassessmentandsurvivalprediction
AT zorzigiovanni petmrinrecurrentglioblastomapatientstreatedwithregorafenib18ffetanddwiadcforresponseassessmentandsurvivalprediction
AT gorgonigiancarlo petmrinrecurrentglioblastomapatientstreatedwithregorafenib18ffetanddwiadcforresponseassessmentandsurvivalprediction
AT caccesemario petmrinrecurrentglioblastomapatientstreatedwithregorafenib18ffetanddwiadcforresponseassessmentandsurvivalprediction
AT padovanmarta petmrinrecurrentglioblastomapatientstreatedwithregorafenib18ffetanddwiadcforresponseassessmentandsurvivalprediction
AT zagonelvittorina petmrinrecurrentglioblastomapatientstreatedwithregorafenib18ffetanddwiadcforresponseassessmentandsurvivalprediction
AT cecchindiego petmrinrecurrentglioblastomapatientstreatedwithregorafenib18ffetanddwiadcforresponseassessmentandsurvivalprediction