Cargando…

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Evaluation of Web-Based Information

Introduction Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the gold standard treatment for symptomatic gallstone disease, is the most common procedure performed by general surgeons worldwide. The internet remains to be a popular source of medical information. Our aim was to evaluate the quality and readability...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mallappa, Sreelakshmi, Soobrah, Ramawad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8722460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004076
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20897
_version_ 1784625526956097536
author Mallappa, Sreelakshmi
Soobrah, Ramawad
author_facet Mallappa, Sreelakshmi
Soobrah, Ramawad
author_sort Mallappa, Sreelakshmi
collection PubMed
description Introduction Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the gold standard treatment for symptomatic gallstone disease, is the most common procedure performed by general surgeons worldwide. The internet remains to be a popular source of medical information. Our aim was to evaluate the quality and readability of information available on the web for patients undergoing LC and to compare the information provided by the National Health Service (NHS) and non-NHS websites.  Methods We searched for the keywords ‘laparoscopic cholecystectomy’ using the three most popular search engines (Google, Yahoo and MSN) and looked at the first 50 websites only. The readability of each document was assessed using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) score. We checked Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode) certification status, whether the sites had been checked by an expert and when the information was last updated. Results Fifty-five of the possible 150 sites were analysed thus excluding repetitions (n=65), irrelevant content (n=26) or inaccessible links (n=3). Only seven of those were HONcode-certified. The mean FRE score was 46 (range 0-68, SD=16.13). There were 13 NHS sites and 42 non-NHS sites. The mean FRE score for the NHS sites was significantly better compared to the non-NHS sites [58.31 (SD=5.01) vs 42.21 (SD=16.35); p=0.001]. Fifty-four per cent (54%) of the analysed websites had been checked by a medical expert and 22% were updated within the last year. Conclusions This study highlights the poor quality and readability of information on medical websites. The information provided by NHS sites have significantly better readability compared to non-NHS sites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8722460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87224602022-01-06 Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Evaluation of Web-Based Information Mallappa, Sreelakshmi Soobrah, Ramawad Cureus General Surgery Introduction Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the gold standard treatment for symptomatic gallstone disease, is the most common procedure performed by general surgeons worldwide. The internet remains to be a popular source of medical information. Our aim was to evaluate the quality and readability of information available on the web for patients undergoing LC and to compare the information provided by the National Health Service (NHS) and non-NHS websites.  Methods We searched for the keywords ‘laparoscopic cholecystectomy’ using the three most popular search engines (Google, Yahoo and MSN) and looked at the first 50 websites only. The readability of each document was assessed using the Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) score. We checked Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct (HONcode) certification status, whether the sites had been checked by an expert and when the information was last updated. Results Fifty-five of the possible 150 sites were analysed thus excluding repetitions (n=65), irrelevant content (n=26) or inaccessible links (n=3). Only seven of those were HONcode-certified. The mean FRE score was 46 (range 0-68, SD=16.13). There were 13 NHS sites and 42 non-NHS sites. The mean FRE score for the NHS sites was significantly better compared to the non-NHS sites [58.31 (SD=5.01) vs 42.21 (SD=16.35); p=0.001]. Fifty-four per cent (54%) of the analysed websites had been checked by a medical expert and 22% were updated within the last year. Conclusions This study highlights the poor quality and readability of information on medical websites. The information provided by NHS sites have significantly better readability compared to non-NHS sites. Cureus 2022-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8722460/ /pubmed/35004076 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20897 Text en Copyright © 2022, Mallappa et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle General Surgery
Mallappa, Sreelakshmi
Soobrah, Ramawad
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Evaluation of Web-Based Information
title Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Evaluation of Web-Based Information
title_full Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Evaluation of Web-Based Information
title_fullStr Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Evaluation of Web-Based Information
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Evaluation of Web-Based Information
title_short Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Evaluation of Web-Based Information
title_sort laparoscopic cholecystectomy: evaluation of web-based information
topic General Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8722460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004076
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20897
work_keys_str_mv AT mallappasreelakshmi laparoscopiccholecystectomyevaluationofwebbasedinformation
AT soobrahramawad laparoscopiccholecystectomyevaluationofwebbasedinformation