Cargando…

Nomogram Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with FIGO II to III Squamous Cell Cervical Carcinoma Under Radical Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis Based on 2018 FIGO Staging

PURPOSE: To present a nomogram to predict overall survival in patients with FIGO-2018 II to III squamous cell cervical carcinoma undergoing radical radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with FIGO-2018 II to III squamous cell cervical cancer between December 2013 and December 2014 we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Zang, Lele, Chen, Qin, Zhang, Xiaozhen, Zhong, Xiaohong, Chen, Jian, Fang, Yi, Lin, An, Wang, Min
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Dove 2021
Materias:	Original Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8722567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002316 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S336892

Ejemplares similares

Reviewing FIGO 2018 cervical cancer staging
por: Soares, Leila Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer
por: Chai, Yanlan, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

A prognostic model using FIGO 2018 staging and MRI-derived tumor volume to predict long-term outcomes in patients with uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma who received definitive radiotherapy
por: Zang, Lele, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Critical analysis of the FIGO 2018 cervical cancer staging
por: Soares, Leila Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cost-effectiveness of radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer
por: Chai, Yanlan, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Prognostic Nomograms Predicting Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The First Nomogram Compared With Revised FIGO 2018 Staging System
por: Yang, Xi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Nomograms Predicting Survival of Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Based on the 2018 FIGO Staging System
por: Meng, Qingyu, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Validation of the 2018 FIGO Staging System of Cervical Cancer for Stage III Patients with a Cohort from China
por: Liu, Xiaoliang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Discussion on the Treatment Strategy for Stage ⅡA1 Cervical Cancer (FIGO 2018)
por: Chen, Xiaolin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Validation of the 2018 FIGO Staging System for Predicting the Prognosis of Patients With Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer
por: Long, Xingtao, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Data from small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: FIGO 2018 staging is more accurate than FIGO 2009
por: Zhang, Yunqiang, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer with different local tumor factors
por: Ye, Yanna, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Implications of the revised cervical cancer FIGO staging system
por: Bhatla, Neerja, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Identifying selection criteria for non‐radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage IB cervical cancer
por: Kasamatsu, Takahiro, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Association of preoperative conization with recurrences after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for FIGO 2018 stage IB1 cervical cancer
por: Ding, Yan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer patients with surgical risk factors
por: Yan, Ding-Ding, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023
por: Berek, Jonathan S., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix
por: Kasamatsu, T, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System
por: Liu, Xiaoliang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Factors of 2018 FIGO Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer: A Review
por: Qin, Fengying, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The upper limit of optimal tumor size in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy
por: Hwang, Woo Yeon, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study
por: Li, Zhiqiang, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Multidisciplinary perspectives on newly revised 2018 FIGO staging of cancer of the cervix uteri
por: Berek, Jonathan S., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Treatment Outcome and Prognosis Factors of FIGO 2018 Stage III Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiation in Vietnam
por: Phung, Huyen Thi, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Survival analysis of revised 2013 FIGO staging classification of epithelial ovarian cancer and comparison with previous FIGO staging classification
por: Paik, E Sun, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

자궁경부암: 개정된 2018 FIGO 병기와 자기공명영상을 중심으로
Publicado: (2021)

Interobserver agreement and prognostic impact for MRI–based 2018 FIGO staging parameters in uterine cervical cancer
por: Wagner-Larsen, Kari S., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Impact of concurrent chemotherapy on definitive radiotherapy for women with FIGO IIIb cervical cancer
por: Kuroda, Yuuki, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

FIGO staging in ovarian carcinoma and histological subtypes
por: Kehoe, Sean
Publicado: (2020)

FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva: 2021 revision
por: Olawaiye, Alexander B., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The Prognostic Impact of Grading in FIGO IB and IIB Squamous Cell Cervical Carcinomas
por: Brambs, Christine E., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for 2018 FIGO stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1 cervical cancer: a large multicenter study
por: Chen, Xiaolin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Prognostic factors and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors of the uterine cervix based on the FIGO 2018 staging system: a single-institution study of 172 patients
por: Chen, Jian, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Vaginal Radical Trachelectomy as Fertility‐Preserving Treatment for Patients with FIGO 2018 Stage 1B2 Cervical Cancer
por: Zusterzeel, Petra L.M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Should the Number of Metastatic Pelvic Lymph Nodes Be Integrated into the 2018 Figo Staging Classification of Early Stage Cervical Cancer?
por: Pedone Anchora, Luigi, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

FIGO 2018 Staging for Cervical Cancer: Influence on Stage Distribution and Outcomes in the 3D-Image-Guided Brachytherapy Era
por: Tomizawa, Kento, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Influence of New FIGO 2018 Staging on Treatment Outcomes in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Single-Center Study
por: Kaur, Satinder, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Diagnostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/MRI for Revised 2018 FIGO Staging in Patients with Cervical Cancer
por: Tsuyoshi, Hideaki, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Validation of the 2018 FIGO Classification for Cervical Cancer: Lymphovascular Space Invasion Should Be Considered in IB1 Stage
por: Balaya, Vincent, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The risk of lymph node metastasis in the new FIGO 2018 stage IA cervical cancer with >7 mm diameter
por: Nicolai, Laure, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_ogmjr5lv6g1arpb4j95a1s2734