Cargando…

COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness rates by week and sources of bias

IMPORTANCE: Randomized clinical trials and observational studies have demonstrated high overall effectiveness for the three US-authorized COVID-19 vaccines against symptomatic COVID-19 infection. Nevertheless, the challenges associated with the use of observational data can undermine the results of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ostropolets, Anna, Hripcsak, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8722616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34981073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.22.21268253
_version_ 1784625548792692736
author Ostropolets, Anna
Hripcsak, George
author_facet Ostropolets, Anna
Hripcsak, George
author_sort Ostropolets, Anna
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Randomized clinical trials and observational studies have demonstrated high overall effectiveness for the three US-authorized COVID-19 vaccines against symptomatic COVID-19 infection. Nevertheless, the challenges associated with the use of observational data can undermine the results of the studies. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of using observational data for vaccine effectiveness studies by examining granular weekly effectiveness. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used Columbia University Medical Center data linked to State and City Immunization Registries to assess the weekly effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. We conducted manual chart review of cases in week one in both groups along with a set of sensitivity analyses for Pfizer- BioNTech, Moderna and Janssen vaccines. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We used propensity score matching with up to 54,987 covariates and fitted Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios and constructed Kaplan-Meier plots for two main outcomes (COVID-19 infection and COVID-19-associated hospitalization). RESULTS: The study included 179,666 patients. We observed increasing effectiveness after the first dose of mRNA vaccines with week 6 effectiveness approximating 84% (95% CI 72–91%) for COVID-19 infection and 86% (95% CI 69–95) for COVID-19-associated hospitalization. When analyzing unexpectedly high effectiveness in week one, chart review revealed that vaccinated patients are less likely to seek care after vaccination and are more likely to be diagnosed with COVID-19 during the encounters for other conditions. Sensitivity analyses showed potential outcome misclassification for COVID-19 ICD10-CM diagnosis and the influence of excluding patients with prior COVID-19 infection and anchoring in the unexposed group. Overall vaccine effectiveness analysis in fully vaccinated patients matched the results of the randomized trials. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Observational data can be used to ascertain vaccine effectiveness if potential biases are accounted for. The data need to be scrutinized to ensure that compared groups exhibit similar health seeking behavior and are equally likely to be captured in the data. Given the difference in temporal trends of vaccine exposure and baseline characteristics, indirect comparison of vaccines may produce biased results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8722616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87226162022-01-04 COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness rates by week and sources of bias Ostropolets, Anna Hripcsak, George medRxiv Article IMPORTANCE: Randomized clinical trials and observational studies have demonstrated high overall effectiveness for the three US-authorized COVID-19 vaccines against symptomatic COVID-19 infection. Nevertheless, the challenges associated with the use of observational data can undermine the results of the studies. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of using observational data for vaccine effectiveness studies by examining granular weekly effectiveness. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: In this retrospective cohort study, we used Columbia University Medical Center data linked to State and City Immunization Registries to assess the weekly effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. We conducted manual chart review of cases in week one in both groups along with a set of sensitivity analyses for Pfizer- BioNTech, Moderna and Janssen vaccines. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We used propensity score matching with up to 54,987 covariates and fitted Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios and constructed Kaplan-Meier plots for two main outcomes (COVID-19 infection and COVID-19-associated hospitalization). RESULTS: The study included 179,666 patients. We observed increasing effectiveness after the first dose of mRNA vaccines with week 6 effectiveness approximating 84% (95% CI 72–91%) for COVID-19 infection and 86% (95% CI 69–95) for COVID-19-associated hospitalization. When analyzing unexpectedly high effectiveness in week one, chart review revealed that vaccinated patients are less likely to seek care after vaccination and are more likely to be diagnosed with COVID-19 during the encounters for other conditions. Sensitivity analyses showed potential outcome misclassification for COVID-19 ICD10-CM diagnosis and the influence of excluding patients with prior COVID-19 infection and anchoring in the unexposed group. Overall vaccine effectiveness analysis in fully vaccinated patients matched the results of the randomized trials. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Observational data can be used to ascertain vaccine effectiveness if potential biases are accounted for. The data need to be scrutinized to ensure that compared groups exhibit similar health seeking behavior and are equally likely to be captured in the data. Given the difference in temporal trends of vaccine exposure and baseline characteristics, indirect comparison of vaccines may produce biased results. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8722616/ /pubmed/34981073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.22.21268253 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Article
Ostropolets, Anna
Hripcsak, George
COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness rates by week and sources of bias
title COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness rates by week and sources of bias
title_full COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness rates by week and sources of bias
title_fullStr COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness rates by week and sources of bias
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness rates by week and sources of bias
title_short COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness rates by week and sources of bias
title_sort covid-19 vaccination effectiveness rates by week and sources of bias
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8722616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34981073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.22.21268253
work_keys_str_mv AT ostropoletsanna covid19vaccinationeffectivenessratesbyweekandsourcesofbias
AT hripcsakgeorge covid19vaccinationeffectivenessratesbyweekandsourcesofbias