Cargando…

Oral Water Has Cardiovascular Effects Up to 60 min in Shock Patients

Aim: Little is known about the cardiovascular effects of oral water intake in shock patients. This study was designed to assess the effect of oral water on stroke volume and blood pressure during a 1-h time period. Method and Results: This open-label, randomized clinical trial included patients admi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guinot, Pierre-Grégoire, Nguyen, Maxime, Duclos, Valerian, Berthoud, Vivien, Bouhemad, Belaid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8722716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988132
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.803979
_version_ 1784625573024235520
author Guinot, Pierre-Grégoire
Nguyen, Maxime
Duclos, Valerian
Berthoud, Vivien
Bouhemad, Belaid
author_facet Guinot, Pierre-Grégoire
Nguyen, Maxime
Duclos, Valerian
Berthoud, Vivien
Bouhemad, Belaid
author_sort Guinot, Pierre-Grégoire
collection PubMed
description Aim: Little is known about the cardiovascular effects of oral water intake in shock patients. This study was designed to assess the effect of oral water on stroke volume and blood pressure during a 1-h time period. Method and Results: This open-label, randomized clinical trial included patients admitted to intensive care with acute circulatory failure. Three ICU units at the anesthesia and critical care department of the Dijon Bourgogne University Hospital. Patients were randomized 1:1 to an intervention or standard care group. The intervention group received 500 ml of oral water while the standard care group received intravenous administration of 500 ml of physiological saline solution. Baseline SV did not differ between the two groups (36 ml [28;51] vs. 38 ml [30;51], p = 0.952). The number of patients who were fluid responders did not differ between the two groups [n = 19 (76%) vs. n = 18 (72%), p = 1]. The median change in stroke volume during the three time points did not differ between the two groups (p < 0.05). In the intervention group, blood pressure increased up to 60 min. In the control group, blood pressure quickly increased at the end of fluid expansion, then returned close to baseline value at 60 min. Conclusion: Shock patients who were administered oral water experienced improvements in blood pressure and blood flow up to 60 min when compared with patients who received intravenous saline solution. Further studies are warranted to confirm these effects. Clinical Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT03951519.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8722716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87227162022-01-04 Oral Water Has Cardiovascular Effects Up to 60 min in Shock Patients Guinot, Pierre-Grégoire Nguyen, Maxime Duclos, Valerian Berthoud, Vivien Bouhemad, Belaid Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Aim: Little is known about the cardiovascular effects of oral water intake in shock patients. This study was designed to assess the effect of oral water on stroke volume and blood pressure during a 1-h time period. Method and Results: This open-label, randomized clinical trial included patients admitted to intensive care with acute circulatory failure. Three ICU units at the anesthesia and critical care department of the Dijon Bourgogne University Hospital. Patients were randomized 1:1 to an intervention or standard care group. The intervention group received 500 ml of oral water while the standard care group received intravenous administration of 500 ml of physiological saline solution. Baseline SV did not differ between the two groups (36 ml [28;51] vs. 38 ml [30;51], p = 0.952). The number of patients who were fluid responders did not differ between the two groups [n = 19 (76%) vs. n = 18 (72%), p = 1]. The median change in stroke volume during the three time points did not differ between the two groups (p < 0.05). In the intervention group, blood pressure increased up to 60 min. In the control group, blood pressure quickly increased at the end of fluid expansion, then returned close to baseline value at 60 min. Conclusion: Shock patients who were administered oral water experienced improvements in blood pressure and blood flow up to 60 min when compared with patients who received intravenous saline solution. Further studies are warranted to confirm these effects. Clinical Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT03951519. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8722716/ /pubmed/34988132 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.803979 Text en Copyright © 2021 Guinot, Nguyen, Duclos, Berthoud, Bouhemad and The water study group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Guinot, Pierre-Grégoire
Nguyen, Maxime
Duclos, Valerian
Berthoud, Vivien
Bouhemad, Belaid
Oral Water Has Cardiovascular Effects Up to 60 min in Shock Patients
title Oral Water Has Cardiovascular Effects Up to 60 min in Shock Patients
title_full Oral Water Has Cardiovascular Effects Up to 60 min in Shock Patients
title_fullStr Oral Water Has Cardiovascular Effects Up to 60 min in Shock Patients
title_full_unstemmed Oral Water Has Cardiovascular Effects Up to 60 min in Shock Patients
title_short Oral Water Has Cardiovascular Effects Up to 60 min in Shock Patients
title_sort oral water has cardiovascular effects up to 60 min in shock patients
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8722716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988132
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.803979
work_keys_str_mv AT guinotpierregregoire oralwaterhascardiovasculareffectsupto60mininshockpatients
AT nguyenmaxime oralwaterhascardiovasculareffectsupto60mininshockpatients
AT duclosvalerian oralwaterhascardiovasculareffectsupto60mininshockpatients
AT berthoudvivien oralwaterhascardiovasculareffectsupto60mininshockpatients
AT bouhemadbelaid oralwaterhascardiovasculareffectsupto60mininshockpatients
AT oralwaterhascardiovasculareffectsupto60mininshockpatients