Cargando…

Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Reliable Exclusion of Residual Cancer in Breast Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND: About 40 % of women with breast cancer achieve a pathologic complete response in the breast after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST). To identify these women, vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) was evaluated to facilitate risk-adaptive surgery. In confirmatory trials, the rates of missed res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koelbel, Vivian, Pfob, André, Schaefgen, Benedikt, Sinn, Peter, Feisst, Manuel, Golatta, Michael, Gomez, Christina, Stieber, Anne, Bach, Paul, Rauch, Geraldine, Heil, Joerg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8724060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10847-9
_version_ 1784625845166407680
author Koelbel, Vivian
Pfob, André
Schaefgen, Benedikt
Sinn, Peter
Feisst, Manuel
Golatta, Michael
Gomez, Christina
Stieber, Anne
Bach, Paul
Rauch, Geraldine
Heil, Joerg
author_facet Koelbel, Vivian
Pfob, André
Schaefgen, Benedikt
Sinn, Peter
Feisst, Manuel
Golatta, Michael
Gomez, Christina
Stieber, Anne
Bach, Paul
Rauch, Geraldine
Heil, Joerg
author_sort Koelbel, Vivian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: About 40 % of women with breast cancer achieve a pathologic complete response in the breast after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST). To identify these women, vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) was evaluated to facilitate risk-adaptive surgery. In confirmatory trials, the rates of missed residual cancer [false-negative rates (FNRs)] were unacceptably high (> 10%). This analysis aimed to improve the ability of VAB to exclude residual cancer in the breast reliably by identifying key characteristics of false-negative cases. METHODS: Uni- and multivariable logistic regressions were performed using data of a prospective multicenter trial (n = 398) to identify patient and VAB characteristics associated with false-negative cases (no residual cancer in the VAB but in the surgical specimen). Based on these findings FNR was exploratively re-calculated. RESULTS: In the multivariable analysis, a false-negative VAB result was significantly associated with accompanying ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the initial diagnostic biopsy [odds ratio (OR), 3.94; p < 0.001], multicentric disease on imaging before NST (OR, 2.74; p = 0.066), and age (OR, 1.03; p = 0.034). Exclusion of women with DCIS or multicentric disease (n = 114) and classication of VABs that did not remove the clip marker as uncertain representative VABs decreased the FNR to 2.9% (3/104). CONCLUSION: For patients without accompanying DCIS or multicentric disease, performing a distinct representative VAB (i.e., removing a well-placed clip marker) after NST suggests that VAB might reliably exclude residual cancer in the breast without surgery. This evidence will inform the design of future trials evaluating risk-adaptive surgery for exceptional responders to NST.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8724060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87240602022-01-13 Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Reliable Exclusion of Residual Cancer in Breast Cancer Patients Koelbel, Vivian Pfob, André Schaefgen, Benedikt Sinn, Peter Feisst, Manuel Golatta, Michael Gomez, Christina Stieber, Anne Bach, Paul Rauch, Geraldine Heil, Joerg Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology BACKGROUND: About 40 % of women with breast cancer achieve a pathologic complete response in the breast after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST). To identify these women, vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) was evaluated to facilitate risk-adaptive surgery. In confirmatory trials, the rates of missed residual cancer [false-negative rates (FNRs)] were unacceptably high (> 10%). This analysis aimed to improve the ability of VAB to exclude residual cancer in the breast reliably by identifying key characteristics of false-negative cases. METHODS: Uni- and multivariable logistic regressions were performed using data of a prospective multicenter trial (n = 398) to identify patient and VAB characteristics associated with false-negative cases (no residual cancer in the VAB but in the surgical specimen). Based on these findings FNR was exploratively re-calculated. RESULTS: In the multivariable analysis, a false-negative VAB result was significantly associated with accompanying ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the initial diagnostic biopsy [odds ratio (OR), 3.94; p < 0.001], multicentric disease on imaging before NST (OR, 2.74; p = 0.066), and age (OR, 1.03; p = 0.034). Exclusion of women with DCIS or multicentric disease (n = 114) and classication of VABs that did not remove the clip marker as uncertain representative VABs decreased the FNR to 2.9% (3/104). CONCLUSION: For patients without accompanying DCIS or multicentric disease, performing a distinct representative VAB (i.e., removing a well-placed clip marker) after NST suggests that VAB might reliably exclude residual cancer in the breast without surgery. This evidence will inform the design of future trials evaluating risk-adaptive surgery for exceptional responders to NST. Springer International Publishing 2021-09-28 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8724060/ /pubmed/34581923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10847-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Breast Oncology
Koelbel, Vivian
Pfob, André
Schaefgen, Benedikt
Sinn, Peter
Feisst, Manuel
Golatta, Michael
Gomez, Christina
Stieber, Anne
Bach, Paul
Rauch, Geraldine
Heil, Joerg
Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Reliable Exclusion of Residual Cancer in Breast Cancer Patients
title Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Reliable Exclusion of Residual Cancer in Breast Cancer Patients
title_full Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Reliable Exclusion of Residual Cancer in Breast Cancer Patients
title_fullStr Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Reliable Exclusion of Residual Cancer in Breast Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Reliable Exclusion of Residual Cancer in Breast Cancer Patients
title_short Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Reliable Exclusion of Residual Cancer in Breast Cancer Patients
title_sort vacuum-assisted breast biopsy after neoadjuvant systemic treatment for reliable exclusion of residual cancer in breast cancer patients
topic Breast Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8724060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10847-9
work_keys_str_mv AT koelbelvivian vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients
AT pfobandre vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients
AT schaefgenbenedikt vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients
AT sinnpeter vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients
AT feisstmanuel vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients
AT golattamichael vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients
AT gomezchristina vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients
AT stieberanne vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients
AT bachpaul vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients
AT rauchgeraldine vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients
AT heiljoerg vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients