Cargando…
Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Reliable Exclusion of Residual Cancer in Breast Cancer Patients
BACKGROUND: About 40 % of women with breast cancer achieve a pathologic complete response in the breast after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST). To identify these women, vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) was evaluated to facilitate risk-adaptive surgery. In confirmatory trials, the rates of missed res...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8724060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10847-9 |
_version_ | 1784625845166407680 |
---|---|
author | Koelbel, Vivian Pfob, André Schaefgen, Benedikt Sinn, Peter Feisst, Manuel Golatta, Michael Gomez, Christina Stieber, Anne Bach, Paul Rauch, Geraldine Heil, Joerg |
author_facet | Koelbel, Vivian Pfob, André Schaefgen, Benedikt Sinn, Peter Feisst, Manuel Golatta, Michael Gomez, Christina Stieber, Anne Bach, Paul Rauch, Geraldine Heil, Joerg |
author_sort | Koelbel, Vivian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: About 40 % of women with breast cancer achieve a pathologic complete response in the breast after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST). To identify these women, vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) was evaluated to facilitate risk-adaptive surgery. In confirmatory trials, the rates of missed residual cancer [false-negative rates (FNRs)] were unacceptably high (> 10%). This analysis aimed to improve the ability of VAB to exclude residual cancer in the breast reliably by identifying key characteristics of false-negative cases. METHODS: Uni- and multivariable logistic regressions were performed using data of a prospective multicenter trial (n = 398) to identify patient and VAB characteristics associated with false-negative cases (no residual cancer in the VAB but in the surgical specimen). Based on these findings FNR was exploratively re-calculated. RESULTS: In the multivariable analysis, a false-negative VAB result was significantly associated with accompanying ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the initial diagnostic biopsy [odds ratio (OR), 3.94; p < 0.001], multicentric disease on imaging before NST (OR, 2.74; p = 0.066), and age (OR, 1.03; p = 0.034). Exclusion of women with DCIS or multicentric disease (n = 114) and classication of VABs that did not remove the clip marker as uncertain representative VABs decreased the FNR to 2.9% (3/104). CONCLUSION: For patients without accompanying DCIS or multicentric disease, performing a distinct representative VAB (i.e., removing a well-placed clip marker) after NST suggests that VAB might reliably exclude residual cancer in the breast without surgery. This evidence will inform the design of future trials evaluating risk-adaptive surgery for exceptional responders to NST. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8724060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87240602022-01-13 Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Reliable Exclusion of Residual Cancer in Breast Cancer Patients Koelbel, Vivian Pfob, André Schaefgen, Benedikt Sinn, Peter Feisst, Manuel Golatta, Michael Gomez, Christina Stieber, Anne Bach, Paul Rauch, Geraldine Heil, Joerg Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology BACKGROUND: About 40 % of women with breast cancer achieve a pathologic complete response in the breast after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST). To identify these women, vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) was evaluated to facilitate risk-adaptive surgery. In confirmatory trials, the rates of missed residual cancer [false-negative rates (FNRs)] were unacceptably high (> 10%). This analysis aimed to improve the ability of VAB to exclude residual cancer in the breast reliably by identifying key characteristics of false-negative cases. METHODS: Uni- and multivariable logistic regressions were performed using data of a prospective multicenter trial (n = 398) to identify patient and VAB characteristics associated with false-negative cases (no residual cancer in the VAB but in the surgical specimen). Based on these findings FNR was exploratively re-calculated. RESULTS: In the multivariable analysis, a false-negative VAB result was significantly associated with accompanying ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the initial diagnostic biopsy [odds ratio (OR), 3.94; p < 0.001], multicentric disease on imaging before NST (OR, 2.74; p = 0.066), and age (OR, 1.03; p = 0.034). Exclusion of women with DCIS or multicentric disease (n = 114) and classication of VABs that did not remove the clip marker as uncertain representative VABs decreased the FNR to 2.9% (3/104). CONCLUSION: For patients without accompanying DCIS or multicentric disease, performing a distinct representative VAB (i.e., removing a well-placed clip marker) after NST suggests that VAB might reliably exclude residual cancer in the breast without surgery. This evidence will inform the design of future trials evaluating risk-adaptive surgery for exceptional responders to NST. Springer International Publishing 2021-09-28 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8724060/ /pubmed/34581923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10847-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Breast Oncology Koelbel, Vivian Pfob, André Schaefgen, Benedikt Sinn, Peter Feisst, Manuel Golatta, Michael Gomez, Christina Stieber, Anne Bach, Paul Rauch, Geraldine Heil, Joerg Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Reliable Exclusion of Residual Cancer in Breast Cancer Patients |
title | Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Reliable Exclusion of Residual Cancer in Breast Cancer Patients |
title_full | Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Reliable Exclusion of Residual Cancer in Breast Cancer Patients |
title_fullStr | Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Reliable Exclusion of Residual Cancer in Breast Cancer Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Reliable Exclusion of Residual Cancer in Breast Cancer Patients |
title_short | Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Reliable Exclusion of Residual Cancer in Breast Cancer Patients |
title_sort | vacuum-assisted breast biopsy after neoadjuvant systemic treatment for reliable exclusion of residual cancer in breast cancer patients |
topic | Breast Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8724060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10847-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koelbelvivian vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients AT pfobandre vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients AT schaefgenbenedikt vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients AT sinnpeter vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients AT feisstmanuel vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients AT golattamichael vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients AT gomezchristina vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients AT stieberanne vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients AT bachpaul vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients AT rauchgeraldine vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients AT heiljoerg vacuumassistedbreastbiopsyafterneoadjuvantsystemictreatmentforreliableexclusionofresidualcancerinbreastcancerpatients |