Cargando…
Refining the ITBCC tumor budding scoring system with a “zero-budding” category in colorectal cancer
Tumor budding scoring guidelines from the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) for colorectal cancer propose three groups: BD1 (0–4 buds/0.785 mm(2)), BD2 (5–9 buds/0.785 mm(2)), and BD3 (10 or more buds/0.785 mm(2)). Here, we investigate whether a fourth scoring category, namely...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8724067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33843013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03090-w |
_version_ | 1784625846424698880 |
---|---|
author | Zlobec, Inti Bächli, Melanie Galuppini, Francesca Berger, Martin D. Dawson, Heather E. Nagtegaal, Iris D. Lugli, Alessandro |
author_facet | Zlobec, Inti Bächli, Melanie Galuppini, Francesca Berger, Martin D. Dawson, Heather E. Nagtegaal, Iris D. Lugli, Alessandro |
author_sort | Zlobec, Inti |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tumor budding scoring guidelines from the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) for colorectal cancer propose three groups: BD1 (0–4 buds/0.785 mm(2)), BD2 (5–9 buds/0.785 mm(2)), and BD3 (10 or more buds/0.785 mm(2)). Here, we investigate whether a fourth scoring category, namely zero buds, may have additional clinical relevance. The number of tumor buds/0.785 mm(2) was scored in 959 cases. Those with zero tumor buds were considered BD0, while a new BD1 category of 1–4 buds was proposed. Associations of both scoring approaches with clinicopathological features were analyzed. Conventional ITBCC scoring showed expected associations with unfavorable histopathological prognostic factors. In total, 111/959 (11.6%) were BD0. A significant difference was found when BD0 was compared statistically to BD1 (1–4 buds) for pT, TNM, tumor grade, and lymphatic, venous, and perineural invasion (p < 0.01, all). Tumors with BD0 occur relatively frequently and contribute additional information on tumor behavior. BD0 should be considered for subsequent ITBCC guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8724067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87240672022-01-13 Refining the ITBCC tumor budding scoring system with a “zero-budding” category in colorectal cancer Zlobec, Inti Bächli, Melanie Galuppini, Francesca Berger, Martin D. Dawson, Heather E. Nagtegaal, Iris D. Lugli, Alessandro Virchows Arch Brief Report Tumor budding scoring guidelines from the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) for colorectal cancer propose three groups: BD1 (0–4 buds/0.785 mm(2)), BD2 (5–9 buds/0.785 mm(2)), and BD3 (10 or more buds/0.785 mm(2)). Here, we investigate whether a fourth scoring category, namely zero buds, may have additional clinical relevance. The number of tumor buds/0.785 mm(2) was scored in 959 cases. Those with zero tumor buds were considered BD0, while a new BD1 category of 1–4 buds was proposed. Associations of both scoring approaches with clinicopathological features were analyzed. Conventional ITBCC scoring showed expected associations with unfavorable histopathological prognostic factors. In total, 111/959 (11.6%) were BD0. A significant difference was found when BD0 was compared statistically to BD1 (1–4 buds) for pT, TNM, tumor grade, and lymphatic, venous, and perineural invasion (p < 0.01, all). Tumors with BD0 occur relatively frequently and contribute additional information on tumor behavior. BD0 should be considered for subsequent ITBCC guidelines. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8724067/ /pubmed/33843013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03090-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Zlobec, Inti Bächli, Melanie Galuppini, Francesca Berger, Martin D. Dawson, Heather E. Nagtegaal, Iris D. Lugli, Alessandro Refining the ITBCC tumor budding scoring system with a “zero-budding” category in colorectal cancer |
title | Refining the ITBCC tumor budding scoring system with a “zero-budding” category in colorectal cancer |
title_full | Refining the ITBCC tumor budding scoring system with a “zero-budding” category in colorectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Refining the ITBCC tumor budding scoring system with a “zero-budding” category in colorectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Refining the ITBCC tumor budding scoring system with a “zero-budding” category in colorectal cancer |
title_short | Refining the ITBCC tumor budding scoring system with a “zero-budding” category in colorectal cancer |
title_sort | refining the itbcc tumor budding scoring system with a “zero-budding” category in colorectal cancer |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8724067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33843013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03090-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zlobecinti refiningtheitbcctumorbuddingscoringsystemwithazerobuddingcategoryincolorectalcancer AT bachlimelanie refiningtheitbcctumorbuddingscoringsystemwithazerobuddingcategoryincolorectalcancer AT galuppinifrancesca refiningtheitbcctumorbuddingscoringsystemwithazerobuddingcategoryincolorectalcancer AT bergermartind refiningtheitbcctumorbuddingscoringsystemwithazerobuddingcategoryincolorectalcancer AT dawsonheathere refiningtheitbcctumorbuddingscoringsystemwithazerobuddingcategoryincolorectalcancer AT nagtegaalirisd refiningtheitbcctumorbuddingscoringsystemwithazerobuddingcategoryincolorectalcancer AT luglialessandro refiningtheitbcctumorbuddingscoringsystemwithazerobuddingcategoryincolorectalcancer |