Cargando…

Refining the ITBCC tumor budding scoring system with a “zero-budding” category in colorectal cancer

Tumor budding scoring guidelines from the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) for colorectal cancer propose three groups: BD1 (0–4 buds/0.785 mm(2)), BD2 (5–9 buds/0.785 mm(2)), and BD3 (10 or more buds/0.785 mm(2)). Here, we investigate whether a fourth scoring category, namely...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zlobec, Inti, Bächli, Melanie, Galuppini, Francesca, Berger, Martin D., Dawson, Heather E., Nagtegaal, Iris D., Lugli, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8724067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33843013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03090-w
_version_ 1784625846424698880
author Zlobec, Inti
Bächli, Melanie
Galuppini, Francesca
Berger, Martin D.
Dawson, Heather E.
Nagtegaal, Iris D.
Lugli, Alessandro
author_facet Zlobec, Inti
Bächli, Melanie
Galuppini, Francesca
Berger, Martin D.
Dawson, Heather E.
Nagtegaal, Iris D.
Lugli, Alessandro
author_sort Zlobec, Inti
collection PubMed
description Tumor budding scoring guidelines from the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) for colorectal cancer propose three groups: BD1 (0–4 buds/0.785 mm(2)), BD2 (5–9 buds/0.785 mm(2)), and BD3 (10 or more buds/0.785 mm(2)). Here, we investigate whether a fourth scoring category, namely zero buds, may have additional clinical relevance. The number of tumor buds/0.785 mm(2) was scored in 959 cases. Those with zero tumor buds were considered BD0, while a new BD1 category of 1–4 buds was proposed. Associations of both scoring approaches with clinicopathological features were analyzed. Conventional ITBCC scoring showed expected associations with unfavorable histopathological prognostic factors. In total, 111/959 (11.6%) were BD0. A significant difference was found when BD0 was compared statistically to BD1 (1–4 buds) for pT, TNM, tumor grade, and lymphatic, venous, and perineural invasion (p < 0.01, all). Tumors with BD0 occur relatively frequently and contribute additional information on tumor behavior. BD0 should be considered for subsequent ITBCC guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8724067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87240672022-01-13 Refining the ITBCC tumor budding scoring system with a “zero-budding” category in colorectal cancer Zlobec, Inti Bächli, Melanie Galuppini, Francesca Berger, Martin D. Dawson, Heather E. Nagtegaal, Iris D. Lugli, Alessandro Virchows Arch Brief Report Tumor budding scoring guidelines from the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) for colorectal cancer propose three groups: BD1 (0–4 buds/0.785 mm(2)), BD2 (5–9 buds/0.785 mm(2)), and BD3 (10 or more buds/0.785 mm(2)). Here, we investigate whether a fourth scoring category, namely zero buds, may have additional clinical relevance. The number of tumor buds/0.785 mm(2) was scored in 959 cases. Those with zero tumor buds were considered BD0, while a new BD1 category of 1–4 buds was proposed. Associations of both scoring approaches with clinicopathological features were analyzed. Conventional ITBCC scoring showed expected associations with unfavorable histopathological prognostic factors. In total, 111/959 (11.6%) were BD0. A significant difference was found when BD0 was compared statistically to BD1 (1–4 buds) for pT, TNM, tumor grade, and lymphatic, venous, and perineural invasion (p < 0.01, all). Tumors with BD0 occur relatively frequently and contribute additional information on tumor behavior. BD0 should be considered for subsequent ITBCC guidelines. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-04-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8724067/ /pubmed/33843013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03090-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Brief Report
Zlobec, Inti
Bächli, Melanie
Galuppini, Francesca
Berger, Martin D.
Dawson, Heather E.
Nagtegaal, Iris D.
Lugli, Alessandro
Refining the ITBCC tumor budding scoring system with a “zero-budding” category in colorectal cancer
title Refining the ITBCC tumor budding scoring system with a “zero-budding” category in colorectal cancer
title_full Refining the ITBCC tumor budding scoring system with a “zero-budding” category in colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Refining the ITBCC tumor budding scoring system with a “zero-budding” category in colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Refining the ITBCC tumor budding scoring system with a “zero-budding” category in colorectal cancer
title_short Refining the ITBCC tumor budding scoring system with a “zero-budding” category in colorectal cancer
title_sort refining the itbcc tumor budding scoring system with a “zero-budding” category in colorectal cancer
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8724067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33843013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03090-w
work_keys_str_mv AT zlobecinti refiningtheitbcctumorbuddingscoringsystemwithazerobuddingcategoryincolorectalcancer
AT bachlimelanie refiningtheitbcctumorbuddingscoringsystemwithazerobuddingcategoryincolorectalcancer
AT galuppinifrancesca refiningtheitbcctumorbuddingscoringsystemwithazerobuddingcategoryincolorectalcancer
AT bergermartind refiningtheitbcctumorbuddingscoringsystemwithazerobuddingcategoryincolorectalcancer
AT dawsonheathere refiningtheitbcctumorbuddingscoringsystemwithazerobuddingcategoryincolorectalcancer
AT nagtegaalirisd refiningtheitbcctumorbuddingscoringsystemwithazerobuddingcategoryincolorectalcancer
AT luglialessandro refiningtheitbcctumorbuddingscoringsystemwithazerobuddingcategoryincolorectalcancer