Cargando…

Novel insights into negative pressure wound healing from an in situ porcine perspective

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is used clinically to promote tissue formation and wound closure. In this study, a porcine wound model was used to further investigate the mechanisms as to how NPWT modulates wound healing via utilization of a form of NPWT called the vacuum‐assisted closure. To...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hodge, Jacob G., Pistorio, Ashley L., Neal, Christopher A., Dai, Hongyan, Nelson‐Brantley, Jennifer G., Steed, Molly E., Korentager, Richard A., Zamierowski, David S., Mellott, Adam J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8724420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34618990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12971
_version_ 1784625903821651968
author Hodge, Jacob G.
Pistorio, Ashley L.
Neal, Christopher A.
Dai, Hongyan
Nelson‐Brantley, Jennifer G.
Steed, Molly E.
Korentager, Richard A.
Zamierowski, David S.
Mellott, Adam J.
author_facet Hodge, Jacob G.
Pistorio, Ashley L.
Neal, Christopher A.
Dai, Hongyan
Nelson‐Brantley, Jennifer G.
Steed, Molly E.
Korentager, Richard A.
Zamierowski, David S.
Mellott, Adam J.
author_sort Hodge, Jacob G.
collection PubMed
description Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is used clinically to promote tissue formation and wound closure. In this study, a porcine wound model was used to further investigate the mechanisms as to how NPWT modulates wound healing via utilization of a form of NPWT called the vacuum‐assisted closure. To observe the effect of NPWT more accurately, non‐NPWT control wounds containing GranuFoam™ dressings, without vacuum exposure, were utilized. In situ histological analysis revealed that NPWT enhanced plasma protein adsorption throughout the GranuFoam™, resulting in increased cellular colonization and tissue ingrowth. Gram staining revealed that NPWT decreased bacterial dissemination to adjacent tissue with greater bacterial localization within the GranuFoam™. Genomic analysis demonstrated the significant changes in gene expression across a number of genes between wounds treated with non‐NPWT and NPWT when compared against baseline tissue. However, minimal differences were noted between non‐NPWT and NPWT wounds, including no significant differences in expression of collagen, angiogenic, or key inflammatory genes. Similarly, significant increases in immune cell populations were observed from day 0 to day 9 for both non‐NPWT and NPWT wounds, though no differences were noted between non‐NPWT and NPWT wounds. Furthermore, histological analysis demonstrated the presence of a foreign body response (FBR), with giant cell formation and encapsulation of GranuFoam™ particles. The unique in situ histological evaluation and genomic comparison of non‐NPWT and NPWT wounds in this pilot study provided a never‐before‐shown perspective, offering novel insights into the physiological processes of NPWT and the potential role of a FBR in NPWT clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8724420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87244202022-10-14 Novel insights into negative pressure wound healing from an in situ porcine perspective Hodge, Jacob G. Pistorio, Ashley L. Neal, Christopher A. Dai, Hongyan Nelson‐Brantley, Jennifer G. Steed, Molly E. Korentager, Richard A. Zamierowski, David S. Mellott, Adam J. Wound Repair Regen Original Research‐Basic Science Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is used clinically to promote tissue formation and wound closure. In this study, a porcine wound model was used to further investigate the mechanisms as to how NPWT modulates wound healing via utilization of a form of NPWT called the vacuum‐assisted closure. To observe the effect of NPWT more accurately, non‐NPWT control wounds containing GranuFoam™ dressings, without vacuum exposure, were utilized. In situ histological analysis revealed that NPWT enhanced plasma protein adsorption throughout the GranuFoam™, resulting in increased cellular colonization and tissue ingrowth. Gram staining revealed that NPWT decreased bacterial dissemination to adjacent tissue with greater bacterial localization within the GranuFoam™. Genomic analysis demonstrated the significant changes in gene expression across a number of genes between wounds treated with non‐NPWT and NPWT when compared against baseline tissue. However, minimal differences were noted between non‐NPWT and NPWT wounds, including no significant differences in expression of collagen, angiogenic, or key inflammatory genes. Similarly, significant increases in immune cell populations were observed from day 0 to day 9 for both non‐NPWT and NPWT wounds, though no differences were noted between non‐NPWT and NPWT wounds. Furthermore, histological analysis demonstrated the presence of a foreign body response (FBR), with giant cell formation and encapsulation of GranuFoam™ particles. The unique in situ histological evaluation and genomic comparison of non‐NPWT and NPWT wounds in this pilot study provided a never‐before‐shown perspective, offering novel insights into the physiological processes of NPWT and the potential role of a FBR in NPWT clinical outcomes. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-10-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8724420/ /pubmed/34618990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12971 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Wound Repair and Regeneration published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Wound Healing Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research‐Basic Science
Hodge, Jacob G.
Pistorio, Ashley L.
Neal, Christopher A.
Dai, Hongyan
Nelson‐Brantley, Jennifer G.
Steed, Molly E.
Korentager, Richard A.
Zamierowski, David S.
Mellott, Adam J.
Novel insights into negative pressure wound healing from an in situ porcine perspective
title Novel insights into negative pressure wound healing from an in situ porcine perspective
title_full Novel insights into negative pressure wound healing from an in situ porcine perspective
title_fullStr Novel insights into negative pressure wound healing from an in situ porcine perspective
title_full_unstemmed Novel insights into negative pressure wound healing from an in situ porcine perspective
title_short Novel insights into negative pressure wound healing from an in situ porcine perspective
title_sort novel insights into negative pressure wound healing from an in situ porcine perspective
topic Original Research‐Basic Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8724420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34618990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12971
work_keys_str_mv AT hodgejacobg novelinsightsintonegativepressurewoundhealingfromaninsituporcineperspective
AT pistorioashleyl novelinsightsintonegativepressurewoundhealingfromaninsituporcineperspective
AT nealchristophera novelinsightsintonegativepressurewoundhealingfromaninsituporcineperspective
AT daihongyan novelinsightsintonegativepressurewoundhealingfromaninsituporcineperspective
AT nelsonbrantleyjenniferg novelinsightsintonegativepressurewoundhealingfromaninsituporcineperspective
AT steedmollye novelinsightsintonegativepressurewoundhealingfromaninsituporcineperspective
AT korentagerricharda novelinsightsintonegativepressurewoundhealingfromaninsituporcineperspective
AT zamierowskidavids novelinsightsintonegativepressurewoundhealingfromaninsituporcineperspective
AT mellottadamj novelinsightsintonegativepressurewoundhealingfromaninsituporcineperspective