Cargando…

Static CT myocardial perfusion imaging: image quality, artifacts including distribution and diagnostic performance compared to (82)Rb PET

BACKGROUND: Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography ((82)Rb PET) MPI is considered a noninvasive reference standard for the assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Our main goal was to compare the diagnostic performance of static rest/ vasodilator stress CT myo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inácio, João R., Srinivasan, Sriraag Balaji, Ruddy, Terrence D., deKemp, Robert A., Rybicki, Frank, Beanlands, Rob S., Chow, Benjamin J. W., Dwivedi, Girish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8724508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34981241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-021-00118-x
_version_ 1784625912840454144
author Inácio, João R.
Srinivasan, Sriraag Balaji
Ruddy, Terrence D.
deKemp, Robert A.
Rybicki, Frank
Beanlands, Rob S.
Chow, Benjamin J. W.
Dwivedi, Girish
author_facet Inácio, João R.
Srinivasan, Sriraag Balaji
Ruddy, Terrence D.
deKemp, Robert A.
Rybicki, Frank
Beanlands, Rob S.
Chow, Benjamin J. W.
Dwivedi, Girish
author_sort Inácio, João R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography ((82)Rb PET) MPI is considered a noninvasive reference standard for the assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Our main goal was to compare the diagnostic performance of static rest/ vasodilator stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI) to stress/ rest (82)Rb PET-MPI for the identification of myocardial ischemia. METHODS: Forty-four patients with suspected or diagnosed CAD underwent both static CT-MPI and (82)Rb PET-MPI at rest and during pharmacological stress. The extent and severity of perfusion defects on PET-MPI were assessed to obtain summed stress score, summed rest score, and summed difference score. The extent and severity of perfusion defects on CT-MPI was visually assessed using the same grading scale. CT-MPI was compared with PET-MPI as the gold standard on a per-territory and a per-patient basis. RESULTS: On a per-patient basis, there was moderate agreement between CT-MPI and PET-MPI with a weighted 0.49 for detection of stress induced perfusion abnormalities. Using PET-MPI as a reference, static CT-MPI had 89% sensitivity (SS), 58% specificity (SP), 71% accuracy (AC), 88% negative predictive value (NPV), and 59% positive predictive value (PPV) to diagnose stress-rest perfusion deficits on a per-patient basis. On a per-territory analysis, CT-MPI had 73% SS, 65% SP, 67% AC, 90.8% NPV, and 34% PPV to diagnose perfusion deficits. CONCLUSIONS: CT-MPI has high sensitivity and good overall accuracy for the diagnosis of functionally significant CAD using (82)Rb PET-MPI as the reference standard. CT-MPI may play an important role in assessing the functional significance of CAD especially in combination with CCTA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8724508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87245082022-01-18 Static CT myocardial perfusion imaging: image quality, artifacts including distribution and diagnostic performance compared to (82)Rb PET Inácio, João R. Srinivasan, Sriraag Balaji Ruddy, Terrence D. deKemp, Robert A. Rybicki, Frank Beanlands, Rob S. Chow, Benjamin J. W. Dwivedi, Girish Eur J Hybrid Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography ((82)Rb PET) MPI is considered a noninvasive reference standard for the assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Our main goal was to compare the diagnostic performance of static rest/ vasodilator stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI) to stress/ rest (82)Rb PET-MPI for the identification of myocardial ischemia. METHODS: Forty-four patients with suspected or diagnosed CAD underwent both static CT-MPI and (82)Rb PET-MPI at rest and during pharmacological stress. The extent and severity of perfusion defects on PET-MPI were assessed to obtain summed stress score, summed rest score, and summed difference score. The extent and severity of perfusion defects on CT-MPI was visually assessed using the same grading scale. CT-MPI was compared with PET-MPI as the gold standard on a per-territory and a per-patient basis. RESULTS: On a per-patient basis, there was moderate agreement between CT-MPI and PET-MPI with a weighted 0.49 for detection of stress induced perfusion abnormalities. Using PET-MPI as a reference, static CT-MPI had 89% sensitivity (SS), 58% specificity (SP), 71% accuracy (AC), 88% negative predictive value (NPV), and 59% positive predictive value (PPV) to diagnose stress-rest perfusion deficits on a per-patient basis. On a per-territory analysis, CT-MPI had 73% SS, 65% SP, 67% AC, 90.8% NPV, and 34% PPV to diagnose perfusion deficits. CONCLUSIONS: CT-MPI has high sensitivity and good overall accuracy for the diagnosis of functionally significant CAD using (82)Rb PET-MPI as the reference standard. CT-MPI may play an important role in assessing the functional significance of CAD especially in combination with CCTA. Springer International Publishing 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8724508/ /pubmed/34981241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-021-00118-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Inácio, João R.
Srinivasan, Sriraag Balaji
Ruddy, Terrence D.
deKemp, Robert A.
Rybicki, Frank
Beanlands, Rob S.
Chow, Benjamin J. W.
Dwivedi, Girish
Static CT myocardial perfusion imaging: image quality, artifacts including distribution and diagnostic performance compared to (82)Rb PET
title Static CT myocardial perfusion imaging: image quality, artifacts including distribution and diagnostic performance compared to (82)Rb PET
title_full Static CT myocardial perfusion imaging: image quality, artifacts including distribution and diagnostic performance compared to (82)Rb PET
title_fullStr Static CT myocardial perfusion imaging: image quality, artifacts including distribution and diagnostic performance compared to (82)Rb PET
title_full_unstemmed Static CT myocardial perfusion imaging: image quality, artifacts including distribution and diagnostic performance compared to (82)Rb PET
title_short Static CT myocardial perfusion imaging: image quality, artifacts including distribution and diagnostic performance compared to (82)Rb PET
title_sort static ct myocardial perfusion imaging: image quality, artifacts including distribution and diagnostic performance compared to (82)rb pet
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8724508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34981241
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-021-00118-x
work_keys_str_mv AT inaciojoaor staticctmyocardialperfusionimagingimagequalityartifactsincludingdistributionanddiagnosticperformancecomparedto82rbpet
AT srinivasansriraagbalaji staticctmyocardialperfusionimagingimagequalityartifactsincludingdistributionanddiagnosticperformancecomparedto82rbpet
AT ruddyterrenced staticctmyocardialperfusionimagingimagequalityartifactsincludingdistributionanddiagnosticperformancecomparedto82rbpet
AT dekemproberta staticctmyocardialperfusionimagingimagequalityartifactsincludingdistributionanddiagnosticperformancecomparedto82rbpet
AT rybickifrank staticctmyocardialperfusionimagingimagequalityartifactsincludingdistributionanddiagnosticperformancecomparedto82rbpet
AT beanlandsrobs staticctmyocardialperfusionimagingimagequalityartifactsincludingdistributionanddiagnosticperformancecomparedto82rbpet
AT chowbenjaminjw staticctmyocardialperfusionimagingimagequalityartifactsincludingdistributionanddiagnosticperformancecomparedto82rbpet
AT dwivedigirish staticctmyocardialperfusionimagingimagequalityartifactsincludingdistributionanddiagnosticperformancecomparedto82rbpet