Cargando…

Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: a cross-sectional analysis—implications for public health communications in Australia

OBJECTIVE: To examine SARS-CoV-2 vaccine confidence, attitudes and intentions in Australian adults as part of the iCARE Study. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional online survey conducted when free COVID-19 vaccinations first became available in Australia in February 2021. PARTICIPANTS: Total of 1166...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Enticott, Joanne, Gill, Jaskirath Singh, Bacon, Simon L., Lavoie, Kim L., Epstein, Daniel S., Dawadi, Shrinkhala, Teede, Helena J, Boyle, Jacqueline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8724587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34980631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057127
_version_ 1784625934650834944
author Enticott, Joanne
Gill, Jaskirath Singh
Bacon, Simon L.
Lavoie, Kim L.
Epstein, Daniel S.
Dawadi, Shrinkhala
Teede, Helena J
Boyle, Jacqueline
author_facet Enticott, Joanne
Gill, Jaskirath Singh
Bacon, Simon L.
Lavoie, Kim L.
Epstein, Daniel S.
Dawadi, Shrinkhala
Teede, Helena J
Boyle, Jacqueline
author_sort Enticott, Joanne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine SARS-CoV-2 vaccine confidence, attitudes and intentions in Australian adults as part of the iCARE Study. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional online survey conducted when free COVID-19 vaccinations first became available in Australia in February 2021. PARTICIPANTS: Total of 1166 Australians from general population aged 18–90 years (mean 52, SD of 19). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: responses to question ‘If a vaccine for COVID-19 were available today, what is the likelihood that you would get vaccinated?’. Secondary outcome: analyses of putative drivers of uptake, including vaccine confidence, socioeconomic status and sources of trust, derived from multiple survey questions. RESULTS: Seventy-eight per cent reported being likely to receive a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Higher SARS-CoV-2 vaccine intentions were associated with: increasing age (OR: 2.01 (95% CI 1.77 to 2.77)), being male (1.37 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.72)), residing in least disadvantaged area quintile (2.27 (95% CI 1.53 to 3.37)) and a self-perceived high risk of getting COVID-19 (1.52 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.14)). However, 72% did not believe they were at a high risk of getting COVID-19. Findings regarding vaccines in general were similar except there were no sex differences. For both the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and vaccines in general, there were no differences in intentions to vaccinate as a function of education level, perceived income level and rurality. Knowing that the vaccine is safe and effective and that getting vaccinated will protect others, trusting the company that made it and vaccination recommended by a doctor were reported to influence a large proportion of the study cohort to uptake the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Seventy-eight per cent reported the intent to continue engaging in virus-protecting behaviours (mask wearing, social distancing, etc) postvaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Most Australians are likely to receive a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Key influencing factors identified (eg, knowing vaccine is safe and effective, and doctor’s recommendation to get vaccinated) can inform public health messaging to enhance vaccination rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8724587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87245872022-01-04 Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: a cross-sectional analysis—implications for public health communications in Australia Enticott, Joanne Gill, Jaskirath Singh Bacon, Simon L. Lavoie, Kim L. Epstein, Daniel S. Dawadi, Shrinkhala Teede, Helena J Boyle, Jacqueline BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: To examine SARS-CoV-2 vaccine confidence, attitudes and intentions in Australian adults as part of the iCARE Study. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional online survey conducted when free COVID-19 vaccinations first became available in Australia in February 2021. PARTICIPANTS: Total of 1166 Australians from general population aged 18–90 years (mean 52, SD of 19). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: responses to question ‘If a vaccine for COVID-19 were available today, what is the likelihood that you would get vaccinated?’. Secondary outcome: analyses of putative drivers of uptake, including vaccine confidence, socioeconomic status and sources of trust, derived from multiple survey questions. RESULTS: Seventy-eight per cent reported being likely to receive a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Higher SARS-CoV-2 vaccine intentions were associated with: increasing age (OR: 2.01 (95% CI 1.77 to 2.77)), being male (1.37 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.72)), residing in least disadvantaged area quintile (2.27 (95% CI 1.53 to 3.37)) and a self-perceived high risk of getting COVID-19 (1.52 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.14)). However, 72% did not believe they were at a high risk of getting COVID-19. Findings regarding vaccines in general were similar except there were no sex differences. For both the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and vaccines in general, there were no differences in intentions to vaccinate as a function of education level, perceived income level and rurality. Knowing that the vaccine is safe and effective and that getting vaccinated will protect others, trusting the company that made it and vaccination recommended by a doctor were reported to influence a large proportion of the study cohort to uptake the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Seventy-eight per cent reported the intent to continue engaging in virus-protecting behaviours (mask wearing, social distancing, etc) postvaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Most Australians are likely to receive a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Key influencing factors identified (eg, knowing vaccine is safe and effective, and doctor’s recommendation to get vaccinated) can inform public health messaging to enhance vaccination rates. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8724587/ /pubmed/34980631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057127 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Enticott, Joanne
Gill, Jaskirath Singh
Bacon, Simon L.
Lavoie, Kim L.
Epstein, Daniel S.
Dawadi, Shrinkhala
Teede, Helena J
Boyle, Jacqueline
Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: a cross-sectional analysis—implications for public health communications in Australia
title Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: a cross-sectional analysis—implications for public health communications in Australia
title_full Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: a cross-sectional analysis—implications for public health communications in Australia
title_fullStr Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: a cross-sectional analysis—implications for public health communications in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: a cross-sectional analysis—implications for public health communications in Australia
title_short Attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: a cross-sectional analysis—implications for public health communications in Australia
title_sort attitudes towards vaccines and intention to vaccinate against covid-19: a cross-sectional analysis—implications for public health communications in australia
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8724587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34980631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057127
work_keys_str_mv AT enticottjoanne attitudestowardsvaccinesandintentiontovaccinateagainstcovid19acrosssectionalanalysisimplicationsforpublichealthcommunicationsinaustralia
AT gilljaskirathsingh attitudestowardsvaccinesandintentiontovaccinateagainstcovid19acrosssectionalanalysisimplicationsforpublichealthcommunicationsinaustralia
AT baconsimonl attitudestowardsvaccinesandintentiontovaccinateagainstcovid19acrosssectionalanalysisimplicationsforpublichealthcommunicationsinaustralia
AT lavoiekiml attitudestowardsvaccinesandintentiontovaccinateagainstcovid19acrosssectionalanalysisimplicationsforpublichealthcommunicationsinaustralia
AT epsteindaniels attitudestowardsvaccinesandintentiontovaccinateagainstcovid19acrosssectionalanalysisimplicationsforpublichealthcommunicationsinaustralia
AT dawadishrinkhala attitudestowardsvaccinesandintentiontovaccinateagainstcovid19acrosssectionalanalysisimplicationsforpublichealthcommunicationsinaustralia
AT teedehelenaj attitudestowardsvaccinesandintentiontovaccinateagainstcovid19acrosssectionalanalysisimplicationsforpublichealthcommunicationsinaustralia
AT boylejacqueline attitudestowardsvaccinesandintentiontovaccinateagainstcovid19acrosssectionalanalysisimplicationsforpublichealthcommunicationsinaustralia
AT attitudestowardsvaccinesandintentiontovaccinateagainstcovid19acrosssectionalanalysisimplicationsforpublichealthcommunicationsinaustralia