Cargando…

Safety and clinical outcomes of remdesivir in hospitalised COVID-19 patients: a retrospective analysis of active surveillance database

BACKGROUND: Real-world data on safety and clinical outcomes of remdesivir in COVID-19 management is scant. We present findings of data analysis conducted for assessing the safety and clinical outcomes of remdesivir treatment for COVID-19 in India. METHODS: This retrospective analysis used data from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupte, Vaishali, Hegde, Rashmi, Sawant, Sandesh, Kalathingal, Kabil, Jadhav, Sonali, Malabade, Rohit, Gogtay, Jaideep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8724590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34983406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-07004-8
_version_ 1784625935741353984
author Gupte, Vaishali
Hegde, Rashmi
Sawant, Sandesh
Kalathingal, Kabil
Jadhav, Sonali
Malabade, Rohit
Gogtay, Jaideep
author_facet Gupte, Vaishali
Hegde, Rashmi
Sawant, Sandesh
Kalathingal, Kabil
Jadhav, Sonali
Malabade, Rohit
Gogtay, Jaideep
author_sort Gupte, Vaishali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Real-world data on safety and clinical outcomes of remdesivir in COVID-19 management is scant. We present findings of data analysis conducted for assessing the safety and clinical outcomes of remdesivir treatment for COVID-19 in India. METHODS: This retrospective analysis used data from an active surveillance programme database of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 who were receiving remdesivir. RESULTS: Of the 2329 patients included, 67.40% were men. Diabetes (29.69%) and hypertension (20.33%) were the most common comorbidities. At remdesivir initiation, 2272 (97.55%) patients were receiving oxygen therapy. Remdesivir was administered for 5 days in 65.38% of patients. Antibiotics (64.90%) and steroids (47.90%) were the most common concomitant medications. Remdesivir was overall well tolerated, and total 119 adverse events were reported; most common were nausea and vomiting in 45.40% and increased liver enzymes in 14.28% patients. 84% of patients were cured/improved, 6.77% died and 9.16% showed no improvement in their clinical status at data collection. Subgroup analyses showed that the mortality rate was significantly lower in patients < 60 years old than in those > 60 years old. Amongst patients on oxygen therapy, the cure/improvement rate was significantly higher in those receiving standard low-flow oxygen than in those receiving mechanical ventilation, non-invasive ventilation, or high-flow oxygen. Factors that were associated with higher mortality were age > 60 years, cardiac disease, diabetes high flow oxygen, non-invasive ventilation and mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed that remdesivir is well tolerated and has an acceptable safety profile. The clinical outcome of cure/improvement was 84%, with a higher improvement in patients < 60 years old and on standard low-flow oxygen. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-07004-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8724590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87245902022-01-04 Safety and clinical outcomes of remdesivir in hospitalised COVID-19 patients: a retrospective analysis of active surveillance database Gupte, Vaishali Hegde, Rashmi Sawant, Sandesh Kalathingal, Kabil Jadhav, Sonali Malabade, Rohit Gogtay, Jaideep BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Real-world data on safety and clinical outcomes of remdesivir in COVID-19 management is scant. We present findings of data analysis conducted for assessing the safety and clinical outcomes of remdesivir treatment for COVID-19 in India. METHODS: This retrospective analysis used data from an active surveillance programme database of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 who were receiving remdesivir. RESULTS: Of the 2329 patients included, 67.40% were men. Diabetes (29.69%) and hypertension (20.33%) were the most common comorbidities. At remdesivir initiation, 2272 (97.55%) patients were receiving oxygen therapy. Remdesivir was administered for 5 days in 65.38% of patients. Antibiotics (64.90%) and steroids (47.90%) were the most common concomitant medications. Remdesivir was overall well tolerated, and total 119 adverse events were reported; most common were nausea and vomiting in 45.40% and increased liver enzymes in 14.28% patients. 84% of patients were cured/improved, 6.77% died and 9.16% showed no improvement in their clinical status at data collection. Subgroup analyses showed that the mortality rate was significantly lower in patients < 60 years old than in those > 60 years old. Amongst patients on oxygen therapy, the cure/improvement rate was significantly higher in those receiving standard low-flow oxygen than in those receiving mechanical ventilation, non-invasive ventilation, or high-flow oxygen. Factors that were associated with higher mortality were age > 60 years, cardiac disease, diabetes high flow oxygen, non-invasive ventilation and mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed that remdesivir is well tolerated and has an acceptable safety profile. The clinical outcome of cure/improvement was 84%, with a higher improvement in patients < 60 years old and on standard low-flow oxygen. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-07004-8. BioMed Central 2022-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8724590/ /pubmed/34983406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-07004-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gupte, Vaishali
Hegde, Rashmi
Sawant, Sandesh
Kalathingal, Kabil
Jadhav, Sonali
Malabade, Rohit
Gogtay, Jaideep
Safety and clinical outcomes of remdesivir in hospitalised COVID-19 patients: a retrospective analysis of active surveillance database
title Safety and clinical outcomes of remdesivir in hospitalised COVID-19 patients: a retrospective analysis of active surveillance database
title_full Safety and clinical outcomes of remdesivir in hospitalised COVID-19 patients: a retrospective analysis of active surveillance database
title_fullStr Safety and clinical outcomes of remdesivir in hospitalised COVID-19 patients: a retrospective analysis of active surveillance database
title_full_unstemmed Safety and clinical outcomes of remdesivir in hospitalised COVID-19 patients: a retrospective analysis of active surveillance database
title_short Safety and clinical outcomes of remdesivir in hospitalised COVID-19 patients: a retrospective analysis of active surveillance database
title_sort safety and clinical outcomes of remdesivir in hospitalised covid-19 patients: a retrospective analysis of active surveillance database
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8724590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34983406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-07004-8
work_keys_str_mv AT guptevaishali safetyandclinicaloutcomesofremdesivirinhospitalisedcovid19patientsaretrospectiveanalysisofactivesurveillancedatabase
AT hegderashmi safetyandclinicaloutcomesofremdesivirinhospitalisedcovid19patientsaretrospectiveanalysisofactivesurveillancedatabase
AT sawantsandesh safetyandclinicaloutcomesofremdesivirinhospitalisedcovid19patientsaretrospectiveanalysisofactivesurveillancedatabase
AT kalathingalkabil safetyandclinicaloutcomesofremdesivirinhospitalisedcovid19patientsaretrospectiveanalysisofactivesurveillancedatabase
AT jadhavsonali safetyandclinicaloutcomesofremdesivirinhospitalisedcovid19patientsaretrospectiveanalysisofactivesurveillancedatabase
AT malabaderohit safetyandclinicaloutcomesofremdesivirinhospitalisedcovid19patientsaretrospectiveanalysisofactivesurveillancedatabase
AT gogtayjaideep safetyandclinicaloutcomesofremdesivirinhospitalisedcovid19patientsaretrospectiveanalysisofactivesurveillancedatabase