Cargando…

Mifepristone Adverse Events Identified by Planned Parenthood in 2009 and 2010 Compared to Those in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and Those Obtained Through the Freedom of Information Act

BACKGROUND: As part of the accelerated approval of mifepristone as an abortifacient in 2000, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) required prescribers to report all serious adverse events (AEs) to the manufacturer who was required to report them to the FDA. This information is included in the FDA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cirucci, Christina A., Aultman, Kathi A., Harrison, Donna J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8724996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34993274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23333928211068919
_version_ 1784626024523235328
author Cirucci, Christina A.
Aultman, Kathi A.
Harrison, Donna J.
author_facet Cirucci, Christina A.
Aultman, Kathi A.
Harrison, Donna J.
author_sort Cirucci, Christina A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As part of the accelerated approval of mifepristone as an abortifacient in 2000, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) required prescribers to report all serious adverse events (AEs) to the manufacturer who was required to report them to the FDA. This information is included in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and is available to the public online. The actual Adverse Event Reports (AERs) can be obtained through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). METHODS: We compared the number of specific AEs and total AERs for mifepristone abortions from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2010 from 1. Planned Parenthood abortion data published by Cleland et al. 2. FAERS online dashboard, and 3. AERs provided through FOIA and analyzed by Aultman et al. RESULTS: Cleland identified 1530 Planned Parenthood mifepristone cases with specific AEs for 2009 and 2010. For this period, FAERS online dashboard includes a total (from all providers) of only 664, and the FDA released only 330 AERs through FOIA. Cleland identified 1158 ongoing pregnancies in 2009 and 2010. FAERs dashboard contains only 95, and only 39 were released via FOIA. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant discrepancies in the total number of AERs and specific AEs for 2009 and 2010 mifepristone abortions reported in 1. Cleland's documentation of Planned Parenthood AEs, 2. FAERS dashboard, and 3. AERs provided through FOIA. These discrepancies render the FAERS inadequate to evaluate the safety of mifepristone abortions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8724996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87249962022-01-05 Mifepristone Adverse Events Identified by Planned Parenthood in 2009 and 2010 Compared to Those in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and Those Obtained Through the Freedom of Information Act Cirucci, Christina A. Aultman, Kathi A. Harrison, Donna J. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol Research Letter BACKGROUND: As part of the accelerated approval of mifepristone as an abortifacient in 2000, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) required prescribers to report all serious adverse events (AEs) to the manufacturer who was required to report them to the FDA. This information is included in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and is available to the public online. The actual Adverse Event Reports (AERs) can be obtained through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). METHODS: We compared the number of specific AEs and total AERs for mifepristone abortions from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2010 from 1. Planned Parenthood abortion data published by Cleland et al. 2. FAERS online dashboard, and 3. AERs provided through FOIA and analyzed by Aultman et al. RESULTS: Cleland identified 1530 Planned Parenthood mifepristone cases with specific AEs for 2009 and 2010. For this period, FAERS online dashboard includes a total (from all providers) of only 664, and the FDA released only 330 AERs through FOIA. Cleland identified 1158 ongoing pregnancies in 2009 and 2010. FAERs dashboard contains only 95, and only 39 were released via FOIA. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant discrepancies in the total number of AERs and specific AEs for 2009 and 2010 mifepristone abortions reported in 1. Cleland's documentation of Planned Parenthood AEs, 2. FAERS dashboard, and 3. AERs provided through FOIA. These discrepancies render the FAERS inadequate to evaluate the safety of mifepristone abortions. SAGE Publications 2021-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8724996/ /pubmed/34993274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23333928211068919 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Letter
Cirucci, Christina A.
Aultman, Kathi A.
Harrison, Donna J.
Mifepristone Adverse Events Identified by Planned Parenthood in 2009 and 2010 Compared to Those in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and Those Obtained Through the Freedom of Information Act
title Mifepristone Adverse Events Identified by Planned Parenthood in 2009 and 2010 Compared to Those in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and Those Obtained Through the Freedom of Information Act
title_full Mifepristone Adverse Events Identified by Planned Parenthood in 2009 and 2010 Compared to Those in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and Those Obtained Through the Freedom of Information Act
title_fullStr Mifepristone Adverse Events Identified by Planned Parenthood in 2009 and 2010 Compared to Those in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and Those Obtained Through the Freedom of Information Act
title_full_unstemmed Mifepristone Adverse Events Identified by Planned Parenthood in 2009 and 2010 Compared to Those in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and Those Obtained Through the Freedom of Information Act
title_short Mifepristone Adverse Events Identified by Planned Parenthood in 2009 and 2010 Compared to Those in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and Those Obtained Through the Freedom of Information Act
title_sort mifepristone adverse events identified by planned parenthood in 2009 and 2010 compared to those in the fda adverse event reporting system and those obtained through the freedom of information act
topic Research Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8724996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34993274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23333928211068919
work_keys_str_mv AT ciruccichristinaa mifepristoneadverseeventsidentifiedbyplannedparenthoodin2009and2010comparedtothoseinthefdaadverseeventreportingsystemandthoseobtainedthroughthefreedomofinformationact
AT aultmankathia mifepristoneadverseeventsidentifiedbyplannedparenthoodin2009and2010comparedtothoseinthefdaadverseeventreportingsystemandthoseobtainedthroughthefreedomofinformationact
AT harrisondonnaj mifepristoneadverseeventsidentifiedbyplannedparenthoodin2009and2010comparedtothoseinthefdaadverseeventreportingsystemandthoseobtainedthroughthefreedomofinformationact