Cargando…

Ocrelizumab versus fingolimod after natalizumab cessation in multiple sclerosis: an observational study

BACKGROUND: Exit strategy after natalizumab cessation in multiple sclerosis (MS) is a crucial point because the risk of disease reactivation is high during this period. The objective of this observational study was to compare ocrelizumab to fingolimod after natalizumab cessation in patients with rel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bigaut, Kévin, Kremer, Laurent, Fabacher, Thibaut, Ahle, Guido, Goudot, Mathilde, Fleury, Marie, Gaultier, Claude, Courtois, Sylvie, Collongues, Nicolas, de Seze, Jérôme
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8725429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34982200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10950-7
_version_ 1784626114956623872
author Bigaut, Kévin
Kremer, Laurent
Fabacher, Thibaut
Ahle, Guido
Goudot, Mathilde
Fleury, Marie
Gaultier, Claude
Courtois, Sylvie
Collongues, Nicolas
de Seze, Jérôme
author_facet Bigaut, Kévin
Kremer, Laurent
Fabacher, Thibaut
Ahle, Guido
Goudot, Mathilde
Fleury, Marie
Gaultier, Claude
Courtois, Sylvie
Collongues, Nicolas
de Seze, Jérôme
author_sort Bigaut, Kévin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Exit strategy after natalizumab cessation in multiple sclerosis (MS) is a crucial point because the risk of disease reactivation is high during this period. The objective of this observational study was to compare ocrelizumab to fingolimod after natalizumab cessation in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS: All RRMS patients starting fingolimod or ocrelizumab within 6 weeks after natalizumab cessation were included. The primary endpoint was the annualized relapse rate (ARR) at 1 year. RESULTS: We included 54 patients receiving fingolimod and 48 patients receiving ocrelizumab after natalizumab cessation. In multivariate analysis, ARR at 1 year was significantly lower in the ocrelizumab group than in the fingolimod group (0.12 ± 0.39 versus 0.41 ± 0.71, p = 0.026), i.e. a 70.7% lower relapse rate. The cumulative probability of relapses at 1 year was 31.5% (17/54 patients) with fingolimod and 10.4% (5/48 patients) with ocrelizumab, corresponding to a hazard ratio of 3.4 (95% confidence interval: 1.1–11, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest ocrelizumab is potentially a better exit strategy than fingolimod after natalizumab cessation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8725429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87254292022-01-04 Ocrelizumab versus fingolimod after natalizumab cessation in multiple sclerosis: an observational study Bigaut, Kévin Kremer, Laurent Fabacher, Thibaut Ahle, Guido Goudot, Mathilde Fleury, Marie Gaultier, Claude Courtois, Sylvie Collongues, Nicolas de Seze, Jérôme J Neurol Original Communication BACKGROUND: Exit strategy after natalizumab cessation in multiple sclerosis (MS) is a crucial point because the risk of disease reactivation is high during this period. The objective of this observational study was to compare ocrelizumab to fingolimod after natalizumab cessation in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). METHODS: All RRMS patients starting fingolimod or ocrelizumab within 6 weeks after natalizumab cessation were included. The primary endpoint was the annualized relapse rate (ARR) at 1 year. RESULTS: We included 54 patients receiving fingolimod and 48 patients receiving ocrelizumab after natalizumab cessation. In multivariate analysis, ARR at 1 year was significantly lower in the ocrelizumab group than in the fingolimod group (0.12 ± 0.39 versus 0.41 ± 0.71, p = 0.026), i.e. a 70.7% lower relapse rate. The cumulative probability of relapses at 1 year was 31.5% (17/54 patients) with fingolimod and 10.4% (5/48 patients) with ocrelizumab, corresponding to a hazard ratio of 3.4 (95% confidence interval: 1.1–11, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest ocrelizumab is potentially a better exit strategy than fingolimod after natalizumab cessation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-04 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8725429/ /pubmed/34982200 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10950-7 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Communication
Bigaut, Kévin
Kremer, Laurent
Fabacher, Thibaut
Ahle, Guido
Goudot, Mathilde
Fleury, Marie
Gaultier, Claude
Courtois, Sylvie
Collongues, Nicolas
de Seze, Jérôme
Ocrelizumab versus fingolimod after natalizumab cessation in multiple sclerosis: an observational study
title Ocrelizumab versus fingolimod after natalizumab cessation in multiple sclerosis: an observational study
title_full Ocrelizumab versus fingolimod after natalizumab cessation in multiple sclerosis: an observational study
title_fullStr Ocrelizumab versus fingolimod after natalizumab cessation in multiple sclerosis: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Ocrelizumab versus fingolimod after natalizumab cessation in multiple sclerosis: an observational study
title_short Ocrelizumab versus fingolimod after natalizumab cessation in multiple sclerosis: an observational study
title_sort ocrelizumab versus fingolimod after natalizumab cessation in multiple sclerosis: an observational study
topic Original Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8725429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34982200
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10950-7
work_keys_str_mv AT bigautkevin ocrelizumabversusfingolimodafternatalizumabcessationinmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT kremerlaurent ocrelizumabversusfingolimodafternatalizumabcessationinmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT fabacherthibaut ocrelizumabversusfingolimodafternatalizumabcessationinmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT ahleguido ocrelizumabversusfingolimodafternatalizumabcessationinmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT goudotmathilde ocrelizumabversusfingolimodafternatalizumabcessationinmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT fleurymarie ocrelizumabversusfingolimodafternatalizumabcessationinmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT gaultierclaude ocrelizumabversusfingolimodafternatalizumabcessationinmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT courtoissylvie ocrelizumabversusfingolimodafternatalizumabcessationinmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT collonguesnicolas ocrelizumabversusfingolimodafternatalizumabcessationinmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy
AT desezejerome ocrelizumabversusfingolimodafternatalizumabcessationinmultiplesclerosisanobservationalstudy