Cargando…

Evaluation of patient outcomes after operative treatment of intra-articular calcaneus fractures

Background: Percutaneous reduction with fixation and open reduction internal fixation are often used to treat intra-articular calcaneus fractures with no consensus on the preferred method. Open techniques have been associated with an increased risk of wound complications, while percutaneous techniqu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steelman, Kevin, Bolz, Nicholas, Feria-Arias, Enrique, Meehan, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: EDP Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8725541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34981738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2021065
_version_ 1784626140439117824
author Steelman, Kevin
Bolz, Nicholas
Feria-Arias, Enrique
Meehan, Robert
author_facet Steelman, Kevin
Bolz, Nicholas
Feria-Arias, Enrique
Meehan, Robert
author_sort Steelman, Kevin
collection PubMed
description Background: Percutaneous reduction with fixation and open reduction internal fixation are often used to treat intra-articular calcaneus fractures with no consensus on the preferred method. Open techniques have been associated with an increased risk of wound complications, while percutaneous techniques may result in inferior reduction capabilities. These injuries pose a challenge to patients as they often result in poor patient outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed patient outcomes of a single surgeon’s experience in treating these injuries at a busy urban Level 1 trauma center. Methods: Patients with intra-articular calcaneus fractures managed operatively over 10 years with a minimum six-month follow-up were included. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on operative technique: closed reduction and percutaneous fixation (CRPF) or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Descriptive analysis of each cohort included postoperative infection, the need for repeat operations, development of post-traumatic subtalar arthritis, and reduction capabilities as assessed by Bohler’s angle. Results: Sixty-two patients were included in this study, with 33 patients in the CRPF group and 29 patients in the ORIF group. Infection requiring a return to the operating room occurred in 1 (3%) CRPF and 7 (24%) ORIF patients. Instrumentation was removed in 23 (70%) CRPF and 9 (31%) ORIF patients. Clinical subtalar arthritis developed in 10 (30%) CRPF and 7 (24%) ORIF patients, requiring arthrodesis in 2 (6%) and 5 (17%) patients, respectively. Both techniques had acceptable restoration of Bohler’s angle immediately postoperatively and at final follow-up. Conclusions: Percutaneous reduction with fixation and open reduction internal fixation may both be considered for the surgical treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Indications for each technique may vary between surgeons, and each has its own set of risk factors and complications, however, both have been shown to result in an acceptable reduction. Level of Evidence: Level IV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8725541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87255412022-02-07 Evaluation of patient outcomes after operative treatment of intra-articular calcaneus fractures Steelman, Kevin Bolz, Nicholas Feria-Arias, Enrique Meehan, Robert SICOT J Original Article Background: Percutaneous reduction with fixation and open reduction internal fixation are often used to treat intra-articular calcaneus fractures with no consensus on the preferred method. Open techniques have been associated with an increased risk of wound complications, while percutaneous techniques may result in inferior reduction capabilities. These injuries pose a challenge to patients as they often result in poor patient outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed patient outcomes of a single surgeon’s experience in treating these injuries at a busy urban Level 1 trauma center. Methods: Patients with intra-articular calcaneus fractures managed operatively over 10 years with a minimum six-month follow-up were included. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on operative technique: closed reduction and percutaneous fixation (CRPF) or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Descriptive analysis of each cohort included postoperative infection, the need for repeat operations, development of post-traumatic subtalar arthritis, and reduction capabilities as assessed by Bohler’s angle. Results: Sixty-two patients were included in this study, with 33 patients in the CRPF group and 29 patients in the ORIF group. Infection requiring a return to the operating room occurred in 1 (3%) CRPF and 7 (24%) ORIF patients. Instrumentation was removed in 23 (70%) CRPF and 9 (31%) ORIF patients. Clinical subtalar arthritis developed in 10 (30%) CRPF and 7 (24%) ORIF patients, requiring arthrodesis in 2 (6%) and 5 (17%) patients, respectively. Both techniques had acceptable restoration of Bohler’s angle immediately postoperatively and at final follow-up. Conclusions: Percutaneous reduction with fixation and open reduction internal fixation may both be considered for the surgical treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Indications for each technique may vary between surgeons, and each has its own set of risk factors and complications, however, both have been shown to result in an acceptable reduction. Level of Evidence: Level IV. EDP Sciences 2021-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8725541/ /pubmed/34981738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2021065 Text en © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Steelman, Kevin
Bolz, Nicholas
Feria-Arias, Enrique
Meehan, Robert
Evaluation of patient outcomes after operative treatment of intra-articular calcaneus fractures
title Evaluation of patient outcomes after operative treatment of intra-articular calcaneus fractures
title_full Evaluation of patient outcomes after operative treatment of intra-articular calcaneus fractures
title_fullStr Evaluation of patient outcomes after operative treatment of intra-articular calcaneus fractures
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of patient outcomes after operative treatment of intra-articular calcaneus fractures
title_short Evaluation of patient outcomes after operative treatment of intra-articular calcaneus fractures
title_sort evaluation of patient outcomes after operative treatment of intra-articular calcaneus fractures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8725541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34981738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2021065
work_keys_str_mv AT steelmankevin evaluationofpatientoutcomesafteroperativetreatmentofintraarticularcalcaneusfractures
AT bolznicholas evaluationofpatientoutcomesafteroperativetreatmentofintraarticularcalcaneusfractures
AT feriaariasenrique evaluationofpatientoutcomesafteroperativetreatmentofintraarticularcalcaneusfractures
AT meehanrobert evaluationofpatientoutcomesafteroperativetreatmentofintraarticularcalcaneusfractures