Cargando…

Undergraduate-level teaching and learning approaches for interprofessional education in the health professions: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Although most systematic reviews of interprofessional education (IPE) evaluated the impact of IPE on the students’ acquisition of knowledge in relation to other professions, the development of teamwork skills, and the changes in collaborative behaviour, the processes involved in IPE (i.e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aldriwesh, Marwh Gassim, Alyousif, Sarah Mohammed, Alharbi, Nouf Sulaiman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8725543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34980083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03073-0
_version_ 1784626140913074176
author Aldriwesh, Marwh Gassim
Alyousif, Sarah Mohammed
Alharbi, Nouf Sulaiman
author_facet Aldriwesh, Marwh Gassim
Alyousif, Sarah Mohammed
Alharbi, Nouf Sulaiman
author_sort Aldriwesh, Marwh Gassim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although most systematic reviews of interprofessional education (IPE) evaluated the impact of IPE on the students’ acquisition of knowledge in relation to other professions, the development of teamwork skills, and the changes in collaborative behaviour, the processes involved in IPE (i.e., approaches to teaching and learning) are under-researched. The purpose of the study was to conduct a systematic review to establish how IPE has been implemented in university-based undergraduate curricula, focusing on the teaching and learning approaches. METHODS: The systematic review was performed in 2020 with three databases: PubMed, Science Direct, and the Cochrane Library. Titles and abstracts were included based on pre-identified eligibility criteria. We used the article entitled ‘Systematic reviews in medical education: a practical approach: AMEE guide 94’ as the basis to establish the aim and methods of the current systematic review from 2010 to 2019. RESULTS: We found 16 articles that met the inclusion criteria and reported the implementation process of IPE in universities from Western, Asian, and African countries. A combination of at least two teaching and learning approaches was used to deliver IPE. The findings indicated that of all the teaching and learning approaches, simulation-based education, e-learning, and problem-based learning were the most prevalent approaches used to deliver IPE. This systematic review also revealed a lack of IPE programmes in the Middle East region. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence synthesised in the current systematic review could support IPE curriculum planners and educators when planning an IPE programme. More global IPE initiatives are required to meet the global health workforce needs. Further studies are required to identify the effectiveness of the different teaching and learning approaches in the development of IPE competencies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-03073-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8725543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87255432022-01-06 Undergraduate-level teaching and learning approaches for interprofessional education in the health professions: a systematic review Aldriwesh, Marwh Gassim Alyousif, Sarah Mohammed Alharbi, Nouf Sulaiman BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Although most systematic reviews of interprofessional education (IPE) evaluated the impact of IPE on the students’ acquisition of knowledge in relation to other professions, the development of teamwork skills, and the changes in collaborative behaviour, the processes involved in IPE (i.e., approaches to teaching and learning) are under-researched. The purpose of the study was to conduct a systematic review to establish how IPE has been implemented in university-based undergraduate curricula, focusing on the teaching and learning approaches. METHODS: The systematic review was performed in 2020 with three databases: PubMed, Science Direct, and the Cochrane Library. Titles and abstracts were included based on pre-identified eligibility criteria. We used the article entitled ‘Systematic reviews in medical education: a practical approach: AMEE guide 94’ as the basis to establish the aim and methods of the current systematic review from 2010 to 2019. RESULTS: We found 16 articles that met the inclusion criteria and reported the implementation process of IPE in universities from Western, Asian, and African countries. A combination of at least two teaching and learning approaches was used to deliver IPE. The findings indicated that of all the teaching and learning approaches, simulation-based education, e-learning, and problem-based learning were the most prevalent approaches used to deliver IPE. This systematic review also revealed a lack of IPE programmes in the Middle East region. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence synthesised in the current systematic review could support IPE curriculum planners and educators when planning an IPE programme. More global IPE initiatives are required to meet the global health workforce needs. Further studies are required to identify the effectiveness of the different teaching and learning approaches in the development of IPE competencies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-03073-0. BioMed Central 2022-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8725543/ /pubmed/34980083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03073-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Aldriwesh, Marwh Gassim
Alyousif, Sarah Mohammed
Alharbi, Nouf Sulaiman
Undergraduate-level teaching and learning approaches for interprofessional education in the health professions: a systematic review
title Undergraduate-level teaching and learning approaches for interprofessional education in the health professions: a systematic review
title_full Undergraduate-level teaching and learning approaches for interprofessional education in the health professions: a systematic review
title_fullStr Undergraduate-level teaching and learning approaches for interprofessional education in the health professions: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Undergraduate-level teaching and learning approaches for interprofessional education in the health professions: a systematic review
title_short Undergraduate-level teaching and learning approaches for interprofessional education in the health professions: a systematic review
title_sort undergraduate-level teaching and learning approaches for interprofessional education in the health professions: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8725543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34980083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03073-0
work_keys_str_mv AT aldriweshmarwhgassim undergraduatelevelteachingandlearningapproachesforinterprofessionaleducationinthehealthprofessionsasystematicreview
AT alyousifsarahmohammed undergraduatelevelteachingandlearningapproachesforinterprofessionaleducationinthehealthprofessionsasystematicreview
AT alharbinoufsulaiman undergraduatelevelteachingandlearningapproachesforinterprofessionaleducationinthehealthprofessionsasystematicreview