Cargando…

Impediments to and impact of checklists on performance of emergency interventions in primary care: an in situ simulation-based randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Medical crises occur rather seldom in the primary care setting, but when they do, initial management impacts on morbidity and mortality. Factors that impede the performance of emergency interventions in primary care have not been studied through in-situ simulation. Checklists reportedly i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dryver, Eric, Knutsson, Jeanette, Ekelund, Ulf, Bergenfelz, Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8725847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34515607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2021.1973250
_version_ 1784626197609578496
author Dryver, Eric
Knutsson, Jeanette
Ekelund, Ulf
Bergenfelz, Anders
author_facet Dryver, Eric
Knutsson, Jeanette
Ekelund, Ulf
Bergenfelz, Anders
author_sort Dryver, Eric
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Medical crises occur rather seldom in the primary care setting, but when they do, initial management impacts on morbidity and mortality. Factors that impede the performance of emergency interventions in primary care have not been studied through in-situ simulation. Checklists reportedly improve crisis management. DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial evaluated emergency intervention performance during two scenarios (hypoglycemia-coma and anaphylaxis-cardiac arrest) simulated at primary care centers, and whether checklist access improved performance. SETTING: Twenty-two primary care centers in Southern Sweden participated in the study. SUBJECTS: A total of 347 personnel performed 100 simulations, 45 with and 55 without checklist access. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time and impediments to performance of five emergency interventions in each scenario. RESULTS: On 28 of the 37 occasions when the adrenalin auto-injector was employed, the administration technique was incorrect. In 9 of 49 scenarios, teams had trouble locating the 30% glucose solution. Median time to supplemental oxygen administration during the first scenario was 186 s compared with 96 s during the second scenario (p < 0.001). Checklist access had no significant impact on time to performance of emergency interventions, aside from shorter time to adequate glucose or glucagon administration (median times 632 s with, 756 s without checklist access; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Unfamiliarity with local emergency equipment impedes the performance of emergency interventions during crises simulated in the primary care setting. Simply providing checklist access does not improve the performance of emergency interventions. KEY POINTS: Little is known about the factors that affect the performance of emergency interventions in the primary care setting. Unfamiliarity with local emergency equipment impedes the performance of emergency interventions during crises simulated in the primary care setting. Simply providing crisis checklist access does not improve the performance of emergency interventions in the primary care setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8725847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87258472022-01-05 Impediments to and impact of checklists on performance of emergency interventions in primary care: an in situ simulation-based randomized controlled trial Dryver, Eric Knutsson, Jeanette Ekelund, Ulf Bergenfelz, Anders Scand J Prim Health Care Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Medical crises occur rather seldom in the primary care setting, but when they do, initial management impacts on morbidity and mortality. Factors that impede the performance of emergency interventions in primary care have not been studied through in-situ simulation. Checklists reportedly improve crisis management. DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial evaluated emergency intervention performance during two scenarios (hypoglycemia-coma and anaphylaxis-cardiac arrest) simulated at primary care centers, and whether checklist access improved performance. SETTING: Twenty-two primary care centers in Southern Sweden participated in the study. SUBJECTS: A total of 347 personnel performed 100 simulations, 45 with and 55 without checklist access. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time and impediments to performance of five emergency interventions in each scenario. RESULTS: On 28 of the 37 occasions when the adrenalin auto-injector was employed, the administration technique was incorrect. In 9 of 49 scenarios, teams had trouble locating the 30% glucose solution. Median time to supplemental oxygen administration during the first scenario was 186 s compared with 96 s during the second scenario (p < 0.001). Checklist access had no significant impact on time to performance of emergency interventions, aside from shorter time to adequate glucose or glucagon administration (median times 632 s with, 756 s without checklist access; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Unfamiliarity with local emergency equipment impedes the performance of emergency interventions during crises simulated in the primary care setting. Simply providing checklist access does not improve the performance of emergency interventions. KEY POINTS: Little is known about the factors that affect the performance of emergency interventions in the primary care setting. Unfamiliarity with local emergency equipment impedes the performance of emergency interventions during crises simulated in the primary care setting. Simply providing crisis checklist access does not improve the performance of emergency interventions in the primary care setting. Taylor & Francis 2021-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8725847/ /pubmed/34515607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2021.1973250 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Dryver, Eric
Knutsson, Jeanette
Ekelund, Ulf
Bergenfelz, Anders
Impediments to and impact of checklists on performance of emergency interventions in primary care: an in situ simulation-based randomized controlled trial
title Impediments to and impact of checklists on performance of emergency interventions in primary care: an in situ simulation-based randomized controlled trial
title_full Impediments to and impact of checklists on performance of emergency interventions in primary care: an in situ simulation-based randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Impediments to and impact of checklists on performance of emergency interventions in primary care: an in situ simulation-based randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Impediments to and impact of checklists on performance of emergency interventions in primary care: an in situ simulation-based randomized controlled trial
title_short Impediments to and impact of checklists on performance of emergency interventions in primary care: an in situ simulation-based randomized controlled trial
title_sort impediments to and impact of checklists on performance of emergency interventions in primary care: an in situ simulation-based randomized controlled trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8725847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34515607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2021.1973250
work_keys_str_mv AT dryvereric impedimentstoandimpactofchecklistsonperformanceofemergencyinterventionsinprimarycareaninsitusimulationbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT knutssonjeanette impedimentstoandimpactofchecklistsonperformanceofemergencyinterventionsinprimarycareaninsitusimulationbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ekelundulf impedimentstoandimpactofchecklistsonperformanceofemergencyinterventionsinprimarycareaninsitusimulationbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bergenfelzanders impedimentstoandimpactofchecklistsonperformanceofemergencyinterventionsinprimarycareaninsitusimulationbasedrandomizedcontrolledtrial