Cargando…
The upconversion quantum yield (UCQY): a review to standardize the measurement methodology, improve comparability, and define efficiency standards
Advancing the upconversion materials field relies on accurate and contrastable photoluminescence efficiency measurements, which are characterised by the absolute upconversion quantum yield (UCQY). However, the methodology for such measurements cannot be extrapolated directly from traditional photolu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8725918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34992499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2021.1967698 |
_version_ | 1784626214928908288 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Callum M. S. Gakamsky, Anna Marques-Hueso, Jose |
author_facet | Jones, Callum M. S. Gakamsky, Anna Marques-Hueso, Jose |
author_sort | Jones, Callum M. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Advancing the upconversion materials field relies on accurate and contrastable photoluminescence efficiency measurements, which are characterised by the absolute upconversion quantum yield (UCQY). However, the methodology for such measurements cannot be extrapolated directly from traditional photoluminescence quantum yield techniques, primarily due to issues that arise from the non-linear behaviour of the UC process. Subsequently, no UCQY standards exist, and significant variations in their reported magnitude can occur between laboratories. In this work, our aim is to provide a path for determining and reporting the most reliable UCQYs possible, by addressing all the effects and uncertainties that influence its value. Here the UCQY standard, at a given excitation power density, is defined under a range of stated experimental conditions, environmental conditions, material properties, and influential effects that have been estimated or corrected for. A broad range of UCQYs reported for various UC materials are scrutinized and categorized based on our assertion of the provided information associated with each value. This is crucial for improved comparability with other types of photoluminescent materials, and in addition, the next generation of UC materials can be built on top of these reliable standards. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8725918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87259182022-01-05 The upconversion quantum yield (UCQY): a review to standardize the measurement methodology, improve comparability, and define efficiency standards Jones, Callum M. S. Gakamsky, Anna Marques-Hueso, Jose Sci Technol Adv Mater Optical, Magnetic and Electronic Device Materials Advancing the upconversion materials field relies on accurate and contrastable photoluminescence efficiency measurements, which are characterised by the absolute upconversion quantum yield (UCQY). However, the methodology for such measurements cannot be extrapolated directly from traditional photoluminescence quantum yield techniques, primarily due to issues that arise from the non-linear behaviour of the UC process. Subsequently, no UCQY standards exist, and significant variations in their reported magnitude can occur between laboratories. In this work, our aim is to provide a path for determining and reporting the most reliable UCQYs possible, by addressing all the effects and uncertainties that influence its value. Here the UCQY standard, at a given excitation power density, is defined under a range of stated experimental conditions, environmental conditions, material properties, and influential effects that have been estimated or corrected for. A broad range of UCQYs reported for various UC materials are scrutinized and categorized based on our assertion of the provided information associated with each value. This is crucial for improved comparability with other types of photoluminescent materials, and in addition, the next generation of UC materials can be built on top of these reliable standards. Taylor & Francis 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8725918/ /pubmed/34992499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2021.1967698 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by National Institute for Materials Science in partnership with Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Optical, Magnetic and Electronic Device Materials Jones, Callum M. S. Gakamsky, Anna Marques-Hueso, Jose The upconversion quantum yield (UCQY): a review to standardize the measurement methodology, improve comparability, and define efficiency standards |
title | The upconversion quantum yield (UCQY): a review to standardize the measurement methodology, improve comparability, and define efficiency standards |
title_full | The upconversion quantum yield (UCQY): a review to standardize the measurement methodology, improve comparability, and define efficiency standards |
title_fullStr | The upconversion quantum yield (UCQY): a review to standardize the measurement methodology, improve comparability, and define efficiency standards |
title_full_unstemmed | The upconversion quantum yield (UCQY): a review to standardize the measurement methodology, improve comparability, and define efficiency standards |
title_short | The upconversion quantum yield (UCQY): a review to standardize the measurement methodology, improve comparability, and define efficiency standards |
title_sort | upconversion quantum yield (ucqy): a review to standardize the measurement methodology, improve comparability, and define efficiency standards |
topic | Optical, Magnetic and Electronic Device Materials |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8725918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34992499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2021.1967698 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonescallumms theupconversionquantumyielducqyareviewtostandardizethemeasurementmethodologyimprovecomparabilityanddefineefficiencystandards AT gakamskyanna theupconversionquantumyielducqyareviewtostandardizethemeasurementmethodologyimprovecomparabilityanddefineefficiencystandards AT marqueshuesojose theupconversionquantumyielducqyareviewtostandardizethemeasurementmethodologyimprovecomparabilityanddefineefficiencystandards AT jonescallumms upconversionquantumyielducqyareviewtostandardizethemeasurementmethodologyimprovecomparabilityanddefineefficiencystandards AT gakamskyanna upconversionquantumyielducqyareviewtostandardizethemeasurementmethodologyimprovecomparabilityanddefineefficiencystandards AT marqueshuesojose upconversionquantumyielducqyareviewtostandardizethemeasurementmethodologyimprovecomparabilityanddefineefficiencystandards |