Cargando…

A Comparison of the Use of Smart Devices, Apps, and Social Media Between Adults With and Without Hearing Impairment: Cross-sectional Web-Based Study

BACKGROUND: eHealth and social media could be of particular benefit to adults with hearing impairment, but it is unknown whether their use of smart devices, apps, and social media is similar to that of the general population. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to study whether adults with normal hearing and thos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Wier, Marieke F, Urry, Emily, Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I, Kramer, Sophia E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8726052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932013
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27599
_version_ 1784626244350902272
author van Wier, Marieke F
Urry, Emily
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I
Kramer, Sophia E
author_facet van Wier, Marieke F
Urry, Emily
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I
Kramer, Sophia E
author_sort van Wier, Marieke F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: eHealth and social media could be of particular benefit to adults with hearing impairment, but it is unknown whether their use of smart devices, apps, and social media is similar to that of the general population. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to study whether adults with normal hearing and those with impaired hearing differ in their weekly use of smart devices, apps, and social media; reasons for using social media; and benefits from using social media. METHODS: We used data from a Dutch cohort, the National Longitudinal Study on Hearing. Data were collected from September 2016 to April 2020 using a web-based questionnaire and speech-in-noise test. The results from this test were used to categorize normal hearing and hearing impairment. Outcomes were compared using (multiple) logistic regression models. RESULTS: Adults with impaired hearing (n=384) did not differ from normal hearing adults (n=341) in their use of a smartphone or tablet. They were less likely to make use of social media apps on a smartphone, tablet, or smartwatch (age-adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.92; P=.02). Use of social media on all devices and use of other apps did not differ. Adults with hearing impairment were more likely to agree with using social media to stay in touch with family members (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.16-2.07; P=.003) and friends (age-adjusted OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.01-1.81; P=.046). Furthermore, they were more likely to agree with using social media to perform their work (age-adjusted OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04-2.18; P=.03). There were no differences in the experienced benefits from social media. CONCLUSIONS: The potential for eHealth is confirmed because adults with hearing impairment are not less likely to use smart devices than their normal hearing peers. Adults with hearing impairment are less likely to use social media apps on a smart device but not less likely to use social media on all types of internet-connected devices. This warrants further research on the types of social media platforms that adults with hearing impairment use and on the type of device on which they prefer to use social media. Given that participants with hearing impairment are more likely than their normal hearing peers to use social media to perform their work, use of social media may be seen as an opportunity to enhance vocational rehabilitation services for persons with hearing impairment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8726052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87260522022-01-21 A Comparison of the Use of Smart Devices, Apps, and Social Media Between Adults With and Without Hearing Impairment: Cross-sectional Web-Based Study van Wier, Marieke F Urry, Emily Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I Kramer, Sophia E J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: eHealth and social media could be of particular benefit to adults with hearing impairment, but it is unknown whether their use of smart devices, apps, and social media is similar to that of the general population. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to study whether adults with normal hearing and those with impaired hearing differ in their weekly use of smart devices, apps, and social media; reasons for using social media; and benefits from using social media. METHODS: We used data from a Dutch cohort, the National Longitudinal Study on Hearing. Data were collected from September 2016 to April 2020 using a web-based questionnaire and speech-in-noise test. The results from this test were used to categorize normal hearing and hearing impairment. Outcomes were compared using (multiple) logistic regression models. RESULTS: Adults with impaired hearing (n=384) did not differ from normal hearing adults (n=341) in their use of a smartphone or tablet. They were less likely to make use of social media apps on a smartphone, tablet, or smartwatch (age-adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.92; P=.02). Use of social media on all devices and use of other apps did not differ. Adults with hearing impairment were more likely to agree with using social media to stay in touch with family members (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.16-2.07; P=.003) and friends (age-adjusted OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.01-1.81; P=.046). Furthermore, they were more likely to agree with using social media to perform their work (age-adjusted OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04-2.18; P=.03). There were no differences in the experienced benefits from social media. CONCLUSIONS: The potential for eHealth is confirmed because adults with hearing impairment are not less likely to use smart devices than their normal hearing peers. Adults with hearing impairment are less likely to use social media apps on a smart device but not less likely to use social media on all types of internet-connected devices. This warrants further research on the types of social media platforms that adults with hearing impairment use and on the type of device on which they prefer to use social media. Given that participants with hearing impairment are more likely than their normal hearing peers to use social media to perform their work, use of social media may be seen as an opportunity to enhance vocational rehabilitation services for persons with hearing impairment. JMIR Publications 2021-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8726052/ /pubmed/34932013 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27599 Text en ©Marieke F van Wier, Emily Urry, Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte, Sophia E Kramer. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 20.12.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
van Wier, Marieke F
Urry, Emily
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I
Kramer, Sophia E
A Comparison of the Use of Smart Devices, Apps, and Social Media Between Adults With and Without Hearing Impairment: Cross-sectional Web-Based Study
title A Comparison of the Use of Smart Devices, Apps, and Social Media Between Adults With and Without Hearing Impairment: Cross-sectional Web-Based Study
title_full A Comparison of the Use of Smart Devices, Apps, and Social Media Between Adults With and Without Hearing Impairment: Cross-sectional Web-Based Study
title_fullStr A Comparison of the Use of Smart Devices, Apps, and Social Media Between Adults With and Without Hearing Impairment: Cross-sectional Web-Based Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of the Use of Smart Devices, Apps, and Social Media Between Adults With and Without Hearing Impairment: Cross-sectional Web-Based Study
title_short A Comparison of the Use of Smart Devices, Apps, and Social Media Between Adults With and Without Hearing Impairment: Cross-sectional Web-Based Study
title_sort comparison of the use of smart devices, apps, and social media between adults with and without hearing impairment: cross-sectional web-based study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8726052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34932013
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27599
work_keys_str_mv AT vanwiermariekef acomparisonoftheuseofsmartdevicesappsandsocialmediabetweenadultswithandwithouthearingimpairmentcrosssectionalwebbasedstudy
AT urryemily acomparisonoftheuseofsmartdevicesappsandsocialmediabetweenadultswithandwithouthearingimpairmentcrosssectionalwebbasedstudy
AT lissenbergwittebirgiti acomparisonoftheuseofsmartdevicesappsandsocialmediabetweenadultswithandwithouthearingimpairmentcrosssectionalwebbasedstudy
AT kramersophiae acomparisonoftheuseofsmartdevicesappsandsocialmediabetweenadultswithandwithouthearingimpairmentcrosssectionalwebbasedstudy
AT vanwiermariekef comparisonoftheuseofsmartdevicesappsandsocialmediabetweenadultswithandwithouthearingimpairmentcrosssectionalwebbasedstudy
AT urryemily comparisonoftheuseofsmartdevicesappsandsocialmediabetweenadultswithandwithouthearingimpairmentcrosssectionalwebbasedstudy
AT lissenbergwittebirgiti comparisonoftheuseofsmartdevicesappsandsocialmediabetweenadultswithandwithouthearingimpairmentcrosssectionalwebbasedstudy
AT kramersophiae comparisonoftheuseofsmartdevicesappsandsocialmediabetweenadultswithandwithouthearingimpairmentcrosssectionalwebbasedstudy