Cargando…

Knowledge-based planning using pseudo-structures for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of postoperative uterine cervical cancer: a multi-institutional study

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of the RapidPlan (RP ) using models registered pseudostructures, and to determine how many structures are required for automatic optimization of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for postoperative uterine cervical cancer. MAT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamima, Tatsuya, Ueda, Yoshihiro, Fukunaga, Jun-ichi, Tamura, Mikoto, Shimizu, Yumiko, Muraki, Yuta, Yoshioka, Yasuo, Kitamura, Nozomi, Nitta, Yuya, Otsuka, Masakazu, Monzen, Hajime
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Via Medica 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8726433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34992856
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0089
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of the RapidPlan (RP ) using models registered pseudostructures, and to determine how many structures are required for automatic optimization of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for postoperative uterine cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pseudo-structures around the PTV were retrospectively contoured for patients who had completed treatment at five institutions. For 22 common patients, plans were generated with a single optimization for models with two (RP_2), four (RP_4), and five (RP_5) registered structures, and the dosimetric parameters of these models were compared with a clinical plan with several optimizations. RESULTS: Most dosimetric parameters showed no major differences between each RP model. In particular, the rectum D(max), V(50Gy), and V(40Gy) with RP_2, RP_4, and RP_5 were not significantly different, and were lower than those of the clinical plan. The average proportions of plans achieving acceptable criteria for dosimetric parameters were close to 100% for all models. Using RP_2, the average time for the VMAT planning was reduced by 88 minutes compared with the clinical plan. CONCLUSION: The RapidPlan model with two registered pseudo-structures could generate clinically acceptable plans while saving time.