Cargando…

Currently used in clinical practice beam rate changes have no significant effect on the reduction of clonogenic capacity of PNT1A cells in vitro

BACKGROUND: Due to the lack of selectivity of ionizing radiation between normal and cancer cells, it is important to improve the existing radiation patterns. Lowering the risk of cancer recurrence and comfort during treatment are priorities in radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the experiment w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Musielak, Marika, Graczyk, Kinga, Szweda, Hubert, Kruszyna-Mochalska, Marta, Suchorska, Wiktoria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Via Medica 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8726442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34992880
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0134
_version_ 1784626324115030016
author Musielak, Marika
Graczyk, Kinga
Szweda, Hubert
Kruszyna-Mochalska, Marta
Suchorska, Wiktoria
author_facet Musielak, Marika
Graczyk, Kinga
Szweda, Hubert
Kruszyna-Mochalska, Marta
Suchorska, Wiktoria
author_sort Musielak, Marika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to the lack of selectivity of ionizing radiation between normal and cancer cells, it is important to improve the existing radiation patterns. Lowering the risk of cancer recurrence and comfort during treatment are priorities in radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the experiment we used dose verification to determine the irradiation time calculated by a treatment planning system for 6XFFF and 10XFFF beams. Cells cultured under standard conditions were irradiated with a dose of 2 Gy at different beam rates 400 MU/min, 600 MU/min, 800 MU/min, 1000 MU/min, 1400 MU/min, 1600 MU/min and 2400 MU/min using 6XFFF, 10XFFF and 6XFF beams. RESULTS: The experiment was aimed at comparing the biological response of normal prostate cells after clinically applied radiation patterns. No statistically significant differences in the cellular response were observed. The wide range of beam rates as well as the beam profiles did not significantly affect cell proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: High beam rates, without significantly affecting the clonogenic capacity of cells, have an impact on the quality of patient’s treatment. With the increasing beam rate the irradiation time is shortened, which has an important impact on patients’ health. This experiment can have a practical significance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8726442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Via Medica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87264422022-01-05 Currently used in clinical practice beam rate changes have no significant effect on the reduction of clonogenic capacity of PNT1A cells in vitro Musielak, Marika Graczyk, Kinga Szweda, Hubert Kruszyna-Mochalska, Marta Suchorska, Wiktoria Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Research Paper BACKGROUND: Due to the lack of selectivity of ionizing radiation between normal and cancer cells, it is important to improve the existing radiation patterns. Lowering the risk of cancer recurrence and comfort during treatment are priorities in radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the experiment we used dose verification to determine the irradiation time calculated by a treatment planning system for 6XFFF and 10XFFF beams. Cells cultured under standard conditions were irradiated with a dose of 2 Gy at different beam rates 400 MU/min, 600 MU/min, 800 MU/min, 1000 MU/min, 1400 MU/min, 1600 MU/min and 2400 MU/min using 6XFFF, 10XFFF and 6XFF beams. RESULTS: The experiment was aimed at comparing the biological response of normal prostate cells after clinically applied radiation patterns. No statistically significant differences in the cellular response were observed. The wide range of beam rates as well as the beam profiles did not significantly affect cell proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: High beam rates, without significantly affecting the clonogenic capacity of cells, have an impact on the quality of patient’s treatment. With the increasing beam rate the irradiation time is shortened, which has an important impact on patients’ health. This experiment can have a practical significance. Via Medica 2021-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8726442/ /pubmed/34992880 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0134 Text en © 2021 Greater Poland Cancer Centre https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially
spellingShingle Research Paper
Musielak, Marika
Graczyk, Kinga
Szweda, Hubert
Kruszyna-Mochalska, Marta
Suchorska, Wiktoria
Currently used in clinical practice beam rate changes have no significant effect on the reduction of clonogenic capacity of PNT1A cells in vitro
title Currently used in clinical practice beam rate changes have no significant effect on the reduction of clonogenic capacity of PNT1A cells in vitro
title_full Currently used in clinical practice beam rate changes have no significant effect on the reduction of clonogenic capacity of PNT1A cells in vitro
title_fullStr Currently used in clinical practice beam rate changes have no significant effect on the reduction of clonogenic capacity of PNT1A cells in vitro
title_full_unstemmed Currently used in clinical practice beam rate changes have no significant effect on the reduction of clonogenic capacity of PNT1A cells in vitro
title_short Currently used in clinical practice beam rate changes have no significant effect on the reduction of clonogenic capacity of PNT1A cells in vitro
title_sort currently used in clinical practice beam rate changes have no significant effect on the reduction of clonogenic capacity of pnt1a cells in vitro
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8726442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34992880
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0134
work_keys_str_mv AT musielakmarika currentlyusedinclinicalpracticebeamratechangeshavenosignificanteffectonthereductionofclonogeniccapacityofpnt1acellsinvitro
AT graczykkinga currentlyusedinclinicalpracticebeamratechangeshavenosignificanteffectonthereductionofclonogeniccapacityofpnt1acellsinvitro
AT szwedahubert currentlyusedinclinicalpracticebeamratechangeshavenosignificanteffectonthereductionofclonogeniccapacityofpnt1acellsinvitro
AT kruszynamochalskamarta currentlyusedinclinicalpracticebeamratechangeshavenosignificanteffectonthereductionofclonogeniccapacityofpnt1acellsinvitro
AT suchorskawiktoria currentlyusedinclinicalpracticebeamratechangeshavenosignificanteffectonthereductionofclonogeniccapacityofpnt1acellsinvitro