Cargando…

Estimates of the stochasticity of droplet dispersion by a cough

In this paper, the statistical distributions of the position and the size of the evaporating droplets after a cough are evaluated, thus characterizing the inherent stochasticity of respiratory releases due to turbulence. For that, ten independent realizations of a cough with realistic initial condit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trivedi, Shrey, Gkantonas, Savvas, Mesquita, Léo C. C., Iavarone, Salvatore, de Oliveira, Pedro M., Mastorakos, Epaminondas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AIP Publishing LLC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8726635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0070528
_version_ 1784626352066920448
author Trivedi, Shrey
Gkantonas, Savvas
Mesquita, Léo C. C.
Iavarone, Salvatore
de Oliveira, Pedro M.
Mastorakos, Epaminondas
author_facet Trivedi, Shrey
Gkantonas, Savvas
Mesquita, Léo C. C.
Iavarone, Salvatore
de Oliveira, Pedro M.
Mastorakos, Epaminondas
author_sort Trivedi, Shrey
collection PubMed
description In this paper, the statistical distributions of the position and the size of the evaporating droplets after a cough are evaluated, thus characterizing the inherent stochasticity of respiratory releases due to turbulence. For that, ten independent realizations of a cough with realistic initial conditions and in a room at 20 °C and 40% relative humidity were performed with large eddy simulations and Lagrangian tracking of the liquid phase. It was found that although turbulence decreases far from the emitter, it results in large variations in the spatial distribution of the droplets. The total suspended liquid mass after 60 s from the cough is in good agreement with that estimated by a one-dimensional model accounting for settling and evaporation under quiescent conditions, while deposition times of droplets in the 10–100 μm range are found to vary significantly, reflected in the mass of liquid, and hence the virus content, potentially inhaled by a receptor. The high variability between events is due to the local fluctuations of temperature, humidity, and velocity on droplet evaporation and motion. The droplet distribution suggests that, in the absence of face coverings, an unprotected cough is not safe at 2 m away from the emitter even outdoors. The results indicate that mitigation measures, such as ventilation to address long-range transmission, can be based on the total suspended liquid content evaluated from reduced-order models. However, the large variability of viral content in the near field produces wide variations in estimates of risk; therefore, a stochastic approach is needed for evaluating short-range transmission risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8726635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AIP Publishing LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87266352022-01-05 Estimates of the stochasticity of droplet dispersion by a cough Trivedi, Shrey Gkantonas, Savvas Mesquita, Léo C. C. Iavarone, Salvatore de Oliveira, Pedro M. Mastorakos, Epaminondas Phys Fluids (1994) ARTICLES In this paper, the statistical distributions of the position and the size of the evaporating droplets after a cough are evaluated, thus characterizing the inherent stochasticity of respiratory releases due to turbulence. For that, ten independent realizations of a cough with realistic initial conditions and in a room at 20 °C and 40% relative humidity were performed with large eddy simulations and Lagrangian tracking of the liquid phase. It was found that although turbulence decreases far from the emitter, it results in large variations in the spatial distribution of the droplets. The total suspended liquid mass after 60 s from the cough is in good agreement with that estimated by a one-dimensional model accounting for settling and evaporation under quiescent conditions, while deposition times of droplets in the 10–100 μm range are found to vary significantly, reflected in the mass of liquid, and hence the virus content, potentially inhaled by a receptor. The high variability between events is due to the local fluctuations of temperature, humidity, and velocity on droplet evaporation and motion. The droplet distribution suggests that, in the absence of face coverings, an unprotected cough is not safe at 2 m away from the emitter even outdoors. The results indicate that mitigation measures, such as ventilation to address long-range transmission, can be based on the total suspended liquid content evaluated from reduced-order models. However, the large variability of viral content in the near field produces wide variations in estimates of risk; therefore, a stochastic approach is needed for evaluating short-range transmission risk. AIP Publishing LLC 2021-11 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8726635/ /pubmed/35002201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0070528 Text en © 2021 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle ARTICLES
Trivedi, Shrey
Gkantonas, Savvas
Mesquita, Léo C. C.
Iavarone, Salvatore
de Oliveira, Pedro M.
Mastorakos, Epaminondas
Estimates of the stochasticity of droplet dispersion by a cough
title Estimates of the stochasticity of droplet dispersion by a cough
title_full Estimates of the stochasticity of droplet dispersion by a cough
title_fullStr Estimates of the stochasticity of droplet dispersion by a cough
title_full_unstemmed Estimates of the stochasticity of droplet dispersion by a cough
title_short Estimates of the stochasticity of droplet dispersion by a cough
title_sort estimates of the stochasticity of droplet dispersion by a cough
topic ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8726635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0070528
work_keys_str_mv AT trivedishrey estimatesofthestochasticityofdropletdispersionbyacough
AT gkantonassavvas estimatesofthestochasticityofdropletdispersionbyacough
AT mesquitaleocc estimatesofthestochasticityofdropletdispersionbyacough
AT iavaronesalvatore estimatesofthestochasticityofdropletdispersionbyacough
AT deoliveirapedrom estimatesofthestochasticityofdropletdispersionbyacough
AT mastorakosepaminondas estimatesofthestochasticityofdropletdispersionbyacough