Cargando…

Imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: A comparison of techniques

The liver is commonly affected by metastatic disease. Therefore, it is essential to detect and characterize liver metastases, assuming that patient management and prognosis rely on it. The imaging techniques that allow non-invasive assessment of liver metastases include ultrasonography, computed tom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freitas, Patrícia S, Janicas, Catarina, Veiga, José, Matos, António P, Herédia, Vasco, Ramalho, Miguel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8727197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35069999
http://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v13.i12.1936
_version_ 1784626466587148288
author Freitas, Patrícia S
Janicas, Catarina
Veiga, José
Matos, António P
Herédia, Vasco
Ramalho, Miguel
author_facet Freitas, Patrícia S
Janicas, Catarina
Veiga, José
Matos, António P
Herédia, Vasco
Ramalho, Miguel
author_sort Freitas, Patrícia S
collection PubMed
description The liver is commonly affected by metastatic disease. Therefore, it is essential to detect and characterize liver metastases, assuming that patient management and prognosis rely on it. The imaging techniques that allow non-invasive assessment of liver metastases include ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, and PET/MRI. In this paper, we review the imaging findings of liver metastases, focusing on each imaging modality’s advantages and potential limitations. We also assess the importance of different imaging modalities for the management, follow-up, and therapy response of liver metastases. To date, both CT and MRI are the most appropriate imaging methods for initial lesion detection, follow-up, and assessment of treatment response. Multiparametric MRI is frequently used as a problem-solving technique for liver lesions and has evolved substantially over the past decade, including hardware and software developments and specific intravenous contrast agents. Several studies have shown that MRI performs better in small-sized metastases and moderate to severe liver steatosis cases. Although state-of-the-art MRI shows a greater sensitivity for detecting and characterizing liver metastases, CT remains the chosen method. We also present the controversial subject of the "economic implication" to use CT over MRI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8727197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87271972022-01-20 Imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: A comparison of techniques Freitas, Patrícia S Janicas, Catarina Veiga, José Matos, António P Herédia, Vasco Ramalho, Miguel World J Hepatol Minireviews The liver is commonly affected by metastatic disease. Therefore, it is essential to detect and characterize liver metastases, assuming that patient management and prognosis rely on it. The imaging techniques that allow non-invasive assessment of liver metastases include ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, and PET/MRI. In this paper, we review the imaging findings of liver metastases, focusing on each imaging modality’s advantages and potential limitations. We also assess the importance of different imaging modalities for the management, follow-up, and therapy response of liver metastases. To date, both CT and MRI are the most appropriate imaging methods for initial lesion detection, follow-up, and assessment of treatment response. Multiparametric MRI is frequently used as a problem-solving technique for liver lesions and has evolved substantially over the past decade, including hardware and software developments and specific intravenous contrast agents. Several studies have shown that MRI performs better in small-sized metastases and moderate to severe liver steatosis cases. Although state-of-the-art MRI shows a greater sensitivity for detecting and characterizing liver metastases, CT remains the chosen method. We also present the controversial subject of the "economic implication" to use CT over MRI. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-12-27 2021-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8727197/ /pubmed/35069999 http://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v13.i12.1936 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Minireviews
Freitas, Patrícia S
Janicas, Catarina
Veiga, José
Matos, António P
Herédia, Vasco
Ramalho, Miguel
Imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: A comparison of techniques
title Imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: A comparison of techniques
title_full Imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: A comparison of techniques
title_fullStr Imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: A comparison of techniques
title_full_unstemmed Imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: A comparison of techniques
title_short Imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: A comparison of techniques
title_sort imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: a comparison of techniques
topic Minireviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8727197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35069999
http://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v13.i12.1936
work_keys_str_mv AT freitaspatricias imagingevaluationoftheliverinoncologypatientsacomparisonoftechniques
AT janicascatarina imagingevaluationoftheliverinoncologypatientsacomparisonoftechniques
AT veigajose imagingevaluationoftheliverinoncologypatientsacomparisonoftechniques
AT matosantoniop imagingevaluationoftheliverinoncologypatientsacomparisonoftechniques
AT herediavasco imagingevaluationoftheliverinoncologypatientsacomparisonoftechniques
AT ramalhomiguel imagingevaluationoftheliverinoncologypatientsacomparisonoftechniques