Cargando…
Imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: A comparison of techniques
The liver is commonly affected by metastatic disease. Therefore, it is essential to detect and characterize liver metastases, assuming that patient management and prognosis rely on it. The imaging techniques that allow non-invasive assessment of liver metastases include ultrasonography, computed tom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8727197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35069999 http://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v13.i12.1936 |
_version_ | 1784626466587148288 |
---|---|
author | Freitas, Patrícia S Janicas, Catarina Veiga, José Matos, António P Herédia, Vasco Ramalho, Miguel |
author_facet | Freitas, Patrícia S Janicas, Catarina Veiga, José Matos, António P Herédia, Vasco Ramalho, Miguel |
author_sort | Freitas, Patrícia S |
collection | PubMed |
description | The liver is commonly affected by metastatic disease. Therefore, it is essential to detect and characterize liver metastases, assuming that patient management and prognosis rely on it. The imaging techniques that allow non-invasive assessment of liver metastases include ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, and PET/MRI. In this paper, we review the imaging findings of liver metastases, focusing on each imaging modality’s advantages and potential limitations. We also assess the importance of different imaging modalities for the management, follow-up, and therapy response of liver metastases. To date, both CT and MRI are the most appropriate imaging methods for initial lesion detection, follow-up, and assessment of treatment response. Multiparametric MRI is frequently used as a problem-solving technique for liver lesions and has evolved substantially over the past decade, including hardware and software developments and specific intravenous contrast agents. Several studies have shown that MRI performs better in small-sized metastases and moderate to severe liver steatosis cases. Although state-of-the-art MRI shows a greater sensitivity for detecting and characterizing liver metastases, CT remains the chosen method. We also present the controversial subject of the "economic implication" to use CT over MRI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8727197 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87271972022-01-20 Imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: A comparison of techniques Freitas, Patrícia S Janicas, Catarina Veiga, José Matos, António P Herédia, Vasco Ramalho, Miguel World J Hepatol Minireviews The liver is commonly affected by metastatic disease. Therefore, it is essential to detect and characterize liver metastases, assuming that patient management and prognosis rely on it. The imaging techniques that allow non-invasive assessment of liver metastases include ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, and PET/MRI. In this paper, we review the imaging findings of liver metastases, focusing on each imaging modality’s advantages and potential limitations. We also assess the importance of different imaging modalities for the management, follow-up, and therapy response of liver metastases. To date, both CT and MRI are the most appropriate imaging methods for initial lesion detection, follow-up, and assessment of treatment response. Multiparametric MRI is frequently used as a problem-solving technique for liver lesions and has evolved substantially over the past decade, including hardware and software developments and specific intravenous contrast agents. Several studies have shown that MRI performs better in small-sized metastases and moderate to severe liver steatosis cases. Although state-of-the-art MRI shows a greater sensitivity for detecting and characterizing liver metastases, CT remains the chosen method. We also present the controversial subject of the "economic implication" to use CT over MRI. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-12-27 2021-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8727197/ /pubmed/35069999 http://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v13.i12.1936 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Minireviews Freitas, Patrícia S Janicas, Catarina Veiga, José Matos, António P Herédia, Vasco Ramalho, Miguel Imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: A comparison of techniques |
title | Imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: A comparison of techniques |
title_full | Imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: A comparison of techniques |
title_fullStr | Imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: A comparison of techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: A comparison of techniques |
title_short | Imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: A comparison of techniques |
title_sort | imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: a comparison of techniques |
topic | Minireviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8727197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35069999 http://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v13.i12.1936 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT freitaspatricias imagingevaluationoftheliverinoncologypatientsacomparisonoftechniques AT janicascatarina imagingevaluationoftheliverinoncologypatientsacomparisonoftechniques AT veigajose imagingevaluationoftheliverinoncologypatientsacomparisonoftechniques AT matosantoniop imagingevaluationoftheliverinoncologypatientsacomparisonoftechniques AT herediavasco imagingevaluationoftheliverinoncologypatientsacomparisonoftechniques AT ramalhomiguel imagingevaluationoftheliverinoncologypatientsacomparisonoftechniques |