Cargando…

Dialogue as a Response to the Psychiatrization of Society? Potentials of the Open Dialogue Approach

In recent decades, the use of psychosocial and psychiatric care systems has increased worldwide. A recent article proposed the concept of psychiatrization as an explanatory framework, describing multiple processes responsible for the spread of psychiatric concepts and forms of treatment. This articl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von Peter, Sebastian, Bergstrøm, Tomi, Nenoff-Herchenbach, Irene, Hopfenbeck, Mark Steven, Pocobello, Raffaella, Aderhold, Volkmar, Alvarez-Monjaras, Mauricio, Seikkula, Jaakko, Heumann, Kolja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8727686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004940
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.806437
_version_ 1784626571217207296
author von Peter, Sebastian
Bergstrøm, Tomi
Nenoff-Herchenbach, Irene
Hopfenbeck, Mark Steven
Pocobello, Raffaella
Aderhold, Volkmar
Alvarez-Monjaras, Mauricio
Seikkula, Jaakko
Heumann, Kolja
author_facet von Peter, Sebastian
Bergstrøm, Tomi
Nenoff-Herchenbach, Irene
Hopfenbeck, Mark Steven
Pocobello, Raffaella
Aderhold, Volkmar
Alvarez-Monjaras, Mauricio
Seikkula, Jaakko
Heumann, Kolja
author_sort von Peter, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description In recent decades, the use of psychosocial and psychiatric care systems has increased worldwide. A recent article proposed the concept of psychiatrization as an explanatory framework, describing multiple processes responsible for the spread of psychiatric concepts and forms of treatment. This article aims to explore the potentials of the Open Dialogue (OD) approach for engaging in less psychiatrizing forms of psychosocial support. While OD may not be an all-encompassing solution to de-psychiatrization, this paper refers to previous research showing that OD has the potential to 1) limit the use of neuroleptics, 2), reduce the incidences of mental health problems and 3) decrease the use of psychiatric services. It substantiates these potentials to de-psychiatrize psychosocial support by exploring the OD’s internal logic, its use of language, its processes of meaning-making, its notion of professionalism, its promotion of dialogue and how OD is set up structurally. The conclusion touches upon the dangers of co-optation, formalization and universalization of the OD approach and stresses the need for more societal, layperson competencies in dealing with psychosocial crises.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8727686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87276862022-01-06 Dialogue as a Response to the Psychiatrization of Society? Potentials of the Open Dialogue Approach von Peter, Sebastian Bergstrøm, Tomi Nenoff-Herchenbach, Irene Hopfenbeck, Mark Steven Pocobello, Raffaella Aderhold, Volkmar Alvarez-Monjaras, Mauricio Seikkula, Jaakko Heumann, Kolja Front Sociol Sociology In recent decades, the use of psychosocial and psychiatric care systems has increased worldwide. A recent article proposed the concept of psychiatrization as an explanatory framework, describing multiple processes responsible for the spread of psychiatric concepts and forms of treatment. This article aims to explore the potentials of the Open Dialogue (OD) approach for engaging in less psychiatrizing forms of psychosocial support. While OD may not be an all-encompassing solution to de-psychiatrization, this paper refers to previous research showing that OD has the potential to 1) limit the use of neuroleptics, 2), reduce the incidences of mental health problems and 3) decrease the use of psychiatric services. It substantiates these potentials to de-psychiatrize psychosocial support by exploring the OD’s internal logic, its use of language, its processes of meaning-making, its notion of professionalism, its promotion of dialogue and how OD is set up structurally. The conclusion touches upon the dangers of co-optation, formalization and universalization of the OD approach and stresses the need for more societal, layperson competencies in dealing with psychosocial crises. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8727686/ /pubmed/35004940 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.806437 Text en Copyright © 2021 von Peter, Bergstrøm, Nenoff-Herchenbach, Hopfenbeck, Pocobello, Aderhold, Alvarez-Monjaras, Seikkula and Heumann. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Sociology
von Peter, Sebastian
Bergstrøm, Tomi
Nenoff-Herchenbach, Irene
Hopfenbeck, Mark Steven
Pocobello, Raffaella
Aderhold, Volkmar
Alvarez-Monjaras, Mauricio
Seikkula, Jaakko
Heumann, Kolja
Dialogue as a Response to the Psychiatrization of Society? Potentials of the Open Dialogue Approach
title Dialogue as a Response to the Psychiatrization of Society? Potentials of the Open Dialogue Approach
title_full Dialogue as a Response to the Psychiatrization of Society? Potentials of the Open Dialogue Approach
title_fullStr Dialogue as a Response to the Psychiatrization of Society? Potentials of the Open Dialogue Approach
title_full_unstemmed Dialogue as a Response to the Psychiatrization of Society? Potentials of the Open Dialogue Approach
title_short Dialogue as a Response to the Psychiatrization of Society? Potentials of the Open Dialogue Approach
title_sort dialogue as a response to the psychiatrization of society? potentials of the open dialogue approach
topic Sociology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8727686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35004940
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.806437
work_keys_str_mv AT vonpetersebastian dialogueasaresponsetothepsychiatrizationofsocietypotentialsoftheopendialogueapproach
AT bergstrømtomi dialogueasaresponsetothepsychiatrizationofsocietypotentialsoftheopendialogueapproach
AT nenoffherchenbachirene dialogueasaresponsetothepsychiatrizationofsocietypotentialsoftheopendialogueapproach
AT hopfenbeckmarksteven dialogueasaresponsetothepsychiatrizationofsocietypotentialsoftheopendialogueapproach
AT pocobelloraffaella dialogueasaresponsetothepsychiatrizationofsocietypotentialsoftheopendialogueapproach
AT aderholdvolkmar dialogueasaresponsetothepsychiatrizationofsocietypotentialsoftheopendialogueapproach
AT alvarezmonjarasmauricio dialogueasaresponsetothepsychiatrizationofsocietypotentialsoftheopendialogueapproach
AT seikkulajaakko dialogueasaresponsetothepsychiatrizationofsocietypotentialsoftheopendialogueapproach
AT heumannkolja dialogueasaresponsetothepsychiatrizationofsocietypotentialsoftheopendialogueapproach