Cargando…
The Long-Term Impact of Vaginal Surgical Mesh Devices in UK Primary Care: A Cohort Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink
PURPOSE: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) may be treated with surgical mesh devices; evidence of their long-term complications is lacking. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Rates of diagnoses of depression, anxiety or self-harm (composite measure) and sexual dysfunction, and rat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002329 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S333775 |
_version_ | 1784626658246918144 |
---|---|
author | McFadden, Emily Lay-Flurrie, Sarah Koshiaris, Constantinos Richards, Georgia C Heneghan, Carl |
author_facet | McFadden, Emily Lay-Flurrie, Sarah Koshiaris, Constantinos Richards, Georgia C Heneghan, Carl |
author_sort | McFadden, Emily |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) may be treated with surgical mesh devices; evidence of their long-term complications is lacking. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Rates of diagnoses of depression, anxiety or self-harm (composite measure) and sexual dysfunction, and rates of prescriptions for antibiotics and opioids were estimated in women with and without mesh surgery, with a diagnostic SUI/POP code, registered in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) gold database. RESULTS: There were 220,544 women eligible for inclusion; 74% (n = 162,687) had SUI, 37% (n = 82,123) had POP, and 11% (n = 24,266) had both. Women undergoing mesh surgery for SUI or POP had about 1.1 times higher rates of antibiotic use. Women with no previous history of the outcome, who underwent mesh surgery had 2.43 (95% CI 2.19–2.70) and 1.47 (95% CI 1.19–1.81) times higher rates of depression, anxiety, or self-harm, 1.88 (95% CI 1.50–2.36) and 1.64 (95% CI 1.02–2.63) times higher rates of sexual dysfunction and 1.40 (95% CI 1.26–1.56) and 1.23 (95% CI 1.01–1.49) times higher opioid use for SUI and POP, respectively. Women with a history of depression, anxiety and self-harm had 0.3 times lower rates of these outcomes with SUI or POP mesh surgery (HR for SUI 0.70 (95% CI 0.67-0.73), HR for POP 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.79)). Women with a history of opioid use who had POP mesh surgery had about 0.09 times lower rates (HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.86–0.96)) of prescriptions. Negative control outcome analyses showed no evidence of an association between asthma consultations and mesh surgery in women with POP, but the rate was 0.09 times lower (HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.87–0.94)) in women with SUI mesh surgery, suggesting that study results are subject to some residual confounding. CONCLUSION: Mesh surgery was associated with poor mental and sexual health outcomes, alongside increased opioid and antibiotic use, in women with no history of these outcomes and improved mental health, and lower opioid use, in women with a previous history of these outcomes. Although our results suggest an influence of residual confounding, careful consideration of the benefits and risk of mesh surgery for women with SUI or POP on an individual basis is required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8728093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87280932022-01-06 The Long-Term Impact of Vaginal Surgical Mesh Devices in UK Primary Care: A Cohort Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink McFadden, Emily Lay-Flurrie, Sarah Koshiaris, Constantinos Richards, Georgia C Heneghan, Carl Clin Epidemiol Original Research PURPOSE: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) may be treated with surgical mesh devices; evidence of their long-term complications is lacking. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Rates of diagnoses of depression, anxiety or self-harm (composite measure) and sexual dysfunction, and rates of prescriptions for antibiotics and opioids were estimated in women with and without mesh surgery, with a diagnostic SUI/POP code, registered in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) gold database. RESULTS: There were 220,544 women eligible for inclusion; 74% (n = 162,687) had SUI, 37% (n = 82,123) had POP, and 11% (n = 24,266) had both. Women undergoing mesh surgery for SUI or POP had about 1.1 times higher rates of antibiotic use. Women with no previous history of the outcome, who underwent mesh surgery had 2.43 (95% CI 2.19–2.70) and 1.47 (95% CI 1.19–1.81) times higher rates of depression, anxiety, or self-harm, 1.88 (95% CI 1.50–2.36) and 1.64 (95% CI 1.02–2.63) times higher rates of sexual dysfunction and 1.40 (95% CI 1.26–1.56) and 1.23 (95% CI 1.01–1.49) times higher opioid use for SUI and POP, respectively. Women with a history of depression, anxiety and self-harm had 0.3 times lower rates of these outcomes with SUI or POP mesh surgery (HR for SUI 0.70 (95% CI 0.67-0.73), HR for POP 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.79)). Women with a history of opioid use who had POP mesh surgery had about 0.09 times lower rates (HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.86–0.96)) of prescriptions. Negative control outcome analyses showed no evidence of an association between asthma consultations and mesh surgery in women with POP, but the rate was 0.09 times lower (HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.87–0.94)) in women with SUI mesh surgery, suggesting that study results are subject to some residual confounding. CONCLUSION: Mesh surgery was associated with poor mental and sexual health outcomes, alongside increased opioid and antibiotic use, in women with no history of these outcomes and improved mental health, and lower opioid use, in women with a previous history of these outcomes. Although our results suggest an influence of residual confounding, careful consideration of the benefits and risk of mesh surgery for women with SUI or POP on an individual basis is required. Dove 2021-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8728093/ /pubmed/35002329 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S333775 Text en © 2021 McFadden et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research McFadden, Emily Lay-Flurrie, Sarah Koshiaris, Constantinos Richards, Georgia C Heneghan, Carl The Long-Term Impact of Vaginal Surgical Mesh Devices in UK Primary Care: A Cohort Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink |
title | The Long-Term Impact of Vaginal Surgical Mesh Devices in UK Primary Care: A Cohort Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink |
title_full | The Long-Term Impact of Vaginal Surgical Mesh Devices in UK Primary Care: A Cohort Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink |
title_fullStr | The Long-Term Impact of Vaginal Surgical Mesh Devices in UK Primary Care: A Cohort Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink |
title_full_unstemmed | The Long-Term Impact of Vaginal Surgical Mesh Devices in UK Primary Care: A Cohort Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink |
title_short | The Long-Term Impact of Vaginal Surgical Mesh Devices in UK Primary Care: A Cohort Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink |
title_sort | long-term impact of vaginal surgical mesh devices in uk primary care: a cohort study in the clinical practice research datalink |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002329 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S333775 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcfaddenemily thelongtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink AT layflurriesarah thelongtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink AT koshiarisconstantinos thelongtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink AT richardsgeorgiac thelongtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink AT heneghancarl thelongtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink AT mcfaddenemily longtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink AT layflurriesarah longtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink AT koshiarisconstantinos longtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink AT richardsgeorgiac longtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink AT heneghancarl longtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink |