Cargando…

The Long-Term Impact of Vaginal Surgical Mesh Devices in UK Primary Care: A Cohort Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink

PURPOSE: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) may be treated with surgical mesh devices; evidence of their long-term complications is lacking. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Rates of diagnoses of depression, anxiety or self-harm (composite measure) and sexual dysfunction, and rat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McFadden, Emily, Lay-Flurrie, Sarah, Koshiaris, Constantinos, Richards, Georgia C, Heneghan, Carl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002329
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S333775
_version_ 1784626658246918144
author McFadden, Emily
Lay-Flurrie, Sarah
Koshiaris, Constantinos
Richards, Georgia C
Heneghan, Carl
author_facet McFadden, Emily
Lay-Flurrie, Sarah
Koshiaris, Constantinos
Richards, Georgia C
Heneghan, Carl
author_sort McFadden, Emily
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) may be treated with surgical mesh devices; evidence of their long-term complications is lacking. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Rates of diagnoses of depression, anxiety or self-harm (composite measure) and sexual dysfunction, and rates of prescriptions for antibiotics and opioids were estimated in women with and without mesh surgery, with a diagnostic SUI/POP code, registered in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) gold database. RESULTS: There were 220,544 women eligible for inclusion; 74% (n = 162,687) had SUI, 37% (n = 82,123) had POP, and 11% (n = 24,266) had both. Women undergoing mesh surgery for SUI or POP had about 1.1 times higher rates of antibiotic use. Women with no previous history of the outcome, who underwent mesh surgery had 2.43 (95% CI 2.19–2.70) and 1.47 (95% CI 1.19–1.81) times higher rates of depression, anxiety, or self-harm, 1.88 (95% CI 1.50–2.36) and 1.64 (95% CI 1.02–2.63) times higher rates of sexual dysfunction and 1.40 (95% CI 1.26–1.56) and 1.23 (95% CI 1.01–1.49) times higher opioid use for SUI and POP, respectively. Women with a history of depression, anxiety and self-harm had 0.3 times lower rates of these outcomes with SUI or POP mesh surgery (HR for SUI 0.70 (95% CI 0.67-0.73), HR for POP 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.79)). Women with a history of opioid use who had POP mesh surgery had about 0.09 times lower rates (HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.86–0.96)) of prescriptions. Negative control outcome analyses showed no evidence of an association between asthma consultations and mesh surgery in women with POP, but the rate was 0.09 times lower (HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.87–0.94)) in women with SUI mesh surgery, suggesting that study results are subject to some residual confounding. CONCLUSION: Mesh surgery was associated with poor mental and sexual health outcomes, alongside increased opioid and antibiotic use, in women with no history of these outcomes and improved mental health, and lower opioid use, in women with a previous history of these outcomes. Although our results suggest an influence of residual confounding, careful consideration of the benefits and risk of mesh surgery for women with SUI or POP on an individual basis is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8728093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87280932022-01-06 The Long-Term Impact of Vaginal Surgical Mesh Devices in UK Primary Care: A Cohort Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink McFadden, Emily Lay-Flurrie, Sarah Koshiaris, Constantinos Richards, Georgia C Heneghan, Carl Clin Epidemiol Original Research PURPOSE: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) may be treated with surgical mesh devices; evidence of their long-term complications is lacking. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Rates of diagnoses of depression, anxiety or self-harm (composite measure) and sexual dysfunction, and rates of prescriptions for antibiotics and opioids were estimated in women with and without mesh surgery, with a diagnostic SUI/POP code, registered in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) gold database. RESULTS: There were 220,544 women eligible for inclusion; 74% (n = 162,687) had SUI, 37% (n = 82,123) had POP, and 11% (n = 24,266) had both. Women undergoing mesh surgery for SUI or POP had about 1.1 times higher rates of antibiotic use. Women with no previous history of the outcome, who underwent mesh surgery had 2.43 (95% CI 2.19–2.70) and 1.47 (95% CI 1.19–1.81) times higher rates of depression, anxiety, or self-harm, 1.88 (95% CI 1.50–2.36) and 1.64 (95% CI 1.02–2.63) times higher rates of sexual dysfunction and 1.40 (95% CI 1.26–1.56) and 1.23 (95% CI 1.01–1.49) times higher opioid use for SUI and POP, respectively. Women with a history of depression, anxiety and self-harm had 0.3 times lower rates of these outcomes with SUI or POP mesh surgery (HR for SUI 0.70 (95% CI 0.67-0.73), HR for POP 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.79)). Women with a history of opioid use who had POP mesh surgery had about 0.09 times lower rates (HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.86–0.96)) of prescriptions. Negative control outcome analyses showed no evidence of an association between asthma consultations and mesh surgery in women with POP, but the rate was 0.09 times lower (HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.87–0.94)) in women with SUI mesh surgery, suggesting that study results are subject to some residual confounding. CONCLUSION: Mesh surgery was associated with poor mental and sexual health outcomes, alongside increased opioid and antibiotic use, in women with no history of these outcomes and improved mental health, and lower opioid use, in women with a previous history of these outcomes. Although our results suggest an influence of residual confounding, careful consideration of the benefits and risk of mesh surgery for women with SUI or POP on an individual basis is required. Dove 2021-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8728093/ /pubmed/35002329 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S333775 Text en © 2021 McFadden et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
McFadden, Emily
Lay-Flurrie, Sarah
Koshiaris, Constantinos
Richards, Georgia C
Heneghan, Carl
The Long-Term Impact of Vaginal Surgical Mesh Devices in UK Primary Care: A Cohort Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink
title The Long-Term Impact of Vaginal Surgical Mesh Devices in UK Primary Care: A Cohort Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink
title_full The Long-Term Impact of Vaginal Surgical Mesh Devices in UK Primary Care: A Cohort Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink
title_fullStr The Long-Term Impact of Vaginal Surgical Mesh Devices in UK Primary Care: A Cohort Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink
title_full_unstemmed The Long-Term Impact of Vaginal Surgical Mesh Devices in UK Primary Care: A Cohort Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink
title_short The Long-Term Impact of Vaginal Surgical Mesh Devices in UK Primary Care: A Cohort Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink
title_sort long-term impact of vaginal surgical mesh devices in uk primary care: a cohort study in the clinical practice research datalink
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35002329
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S333775
work_keys_str_mv AT mcfaddenemily thelongtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT layflurriesarah thelongtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT koshiarisconstantinos thelongtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT richardsgeorgiac thelongtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT heneghancarl thelongtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT mcfaddenemily longtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT layflurriesarah longtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT koshiarisconstantinos longtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT richardsgeorgiac longtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink
AT heneghancarl longtermimpactofvaginalsurgicalmeshdevicesinukprimarycareacohortstudyintheclinicalpracticeresearchdatalink