Cargando…

Indicators of response to exercise training: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Means-based analysis of maximal rate of oxygen consumption (VO(2max)) has traditionally been used as the exercise response indicator to assess the efficacy of endurance (END), high intensity interval (HIIT) and resistance exercise training (RET) for improving cardiorespiratory fitness an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ardavani, Arash, Aziz, Hariz, Phillips, Bethan E, Doleman, Brett, Ramzan, Imran, Mozaffar, Boshra, Atherton, Philip J, Idris, Iskandar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34301648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044676
_version_ 1784626715374387200
author Ardavani, Arash
Aziz, Hariz
Phillips, Bethan E
Doleman, Brett
Ramzan, Imran
Mozaffar, Boshra
Atherton, Philip J
Idris, Iskandar
author_facet Ardavani, Arash
Aziz, Hariz
Phillips, Bethan E
Doleman, Brett
Ramzan, Imran
Mozaffar, Boshra
Atherton, Philip J
Idris, Iskandar
author_sort Ardavani, Arash
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Means-based analysis of maximal rate of oxygen consumption (VO(2max)) has traditionally been used as the exercise response indicator to assess the efficacy of endurance (END), high intensity interval (HIIT) and resistance exercise training (RET) for improving cardiorespiratory fitness and whole-body health. However, considerable heterogeneity exists in the interindividual variability response to the same or different training modalities. OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate exercise response rates in the context of VO(2max): (1) in each training modality (END, HIIT and RET) versus controls, (2) in END versus either HIIT or RET and (3) exercise response rates as measured by VO(2max) versus other indicators of positive exercise response in each exercise modality. METHODS: Three databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL) and additional sources were searched. Both individual response rate and population average data were incorporated through continuous data, respectively. Of 3268 identified manuscripts, a total of 29 studies were suitable for qualitative synthesis and a further 22 for quantitative. Stratification based on intervention duration (less than 12 weeks; more than or equal to 12 weeks) was undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 62 data points were procured. Both END and HIIT training exhibited differential improvements in VO(2max) based on intervention duration. VO(2max) did not adequately differentiate between END and HIIT, irrespective of intervention length. Although none of the other exercise response indicators achieved statistical significance, LT and HR(rest) demonstrated common trajectories in pooled and separate analyses between modalities. RET data were highly limited. Heterogeneity was ubiquitous across all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The potential for LT and HR(rest) as indicators of exercise response requires further elucidation, in addition to the exploration of interventional and intrinsic sources of heterogeneity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8728353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87283532022-01-18 Indicators of response to exercise training: a systematic review and meta-analysis Ardavani, Arash Aziz, Hariz Phillips, Bethan E Doleman, Brett Ramzan, Imran Mozaffar, Boshra Atherton, Philip J Idris, Iskandar BMJ Open Sports and Exercise Medicine BACKGROUND: Means-based analysis of maximal rate of oxygen consumption (VO(2max)) has traditionally been used as the exercise response indicator to assess the efficacy of endurance (END), high intensity interval (HIIT) and resistance exercise training (RET) for improving cardiorespiratory fitness and whole-body health. However, considerable heterogeneity exists in the interindividual variability response to the same or different training modalities. OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate exercise response rates in the context of VO(2max): (1) in each training modality (END, HIIT and RET) versus controls, (2) in END versus either HIIT or RET and (3) exercise response rates as measured by VO(2max) versus other indicators of positive exercise response in each exercise modality. METHODS: Three databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL) and additional sources were searched. Both individual response rate and population average data were incorporated through continuous data, respectively. Of 3268 identified manuscripts, a total of 29 studies were suitable for qualitative synthesis and a further 22 for quantitative. Stratification based on intervention duration (less than 12 weeks; more than or equal to 12 weeks) was undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 62 data points were procured. Both END and HIIT training exhibited differential improvements in VO(2max) based on intervention duration. VO(2max) did not adequately differentiate between END and HIIT, irrespective of intervention length. Although none of the other exercise response indicators achieved statistical significance, LT and HR(rest) demonstrated common trajectories in pooled and separate analyses between modalities. RET data were highly limited. Heterogeneity was ubiquitous across all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The potential for LT and HR(rest) as indicators of exercise response requires further elucidation, in addition to the exploration of interventional and intrinsic sources of heterogeneity. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8728353/ /pubmed/34301648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044676 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Sports and Exercise Medicine
Ardavani, Arash
Aziz, Hariz
Phillips, Bethan E
Doleman, Brett
Ramzan, Imran
Mozaffar, Boshra
Atherton, Philip J
Idris, Iskandar
Indicators of response to exercise training: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Indicators of response to exercise training: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Indicators of response to exercise training: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Indicators of response to exercise training: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Indicators of response to exercise training: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Indicators of response to exercise training: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort indicators of response to exercise training: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Sports and Exercise Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34301648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044676
work_keys_str_mv AT ardavaniarash indicatorsofresponsetoexercisetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT azizhariz indicatorsofresponsetoexercisetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT phillipsbethane indicatorsofresponsetoexercisetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dolemanbrett indicatorsofresponsetoexercisetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ramzanimran indicatorsofresponsetoexercisetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mozaffarboshra indicatorsofresponsetoexercisetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT athertonphilipj indicatorsofresponsetoexercisetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT idrisiskandar indicatorsofresponsetoexercisetrainingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis